Now
Fair
27°
High
47°
Low
29°

Ed Board approves diversity resolution

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By KEVIN ABOUREZK / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Apr 03, 2008 - 03:41:54 pm CDT

The Nebraska Board of Education unanimously approved a resolution Thursday supporting racial, ethnic and gender diversity within state public educational institutions.

The resolution, which also supports programs that improve educational access for all qualified students, is a reaction to an effort under way to end affirmative action in Nebraska.

The board voted 7-0 with one member, Joe Higgins, absent.

Story Photo
Carole Woods Harris

Board member Carole Woods Harris, who introduced the resolution, said she was pleased the board chose to support diversity within public education ranks.

She called it a good time to send a message to the rest of the state about the board’s stance on the proposed ban.

The ban effort is being led by Ward Connerly, who heads the California-based Super Tuesday for Equal Rights. The group has been successful in California, Michigan and Washington and is targeting five states, Nebraska included, this year.

The group’s allies need to gather 115,000 signatures by July 4 to place the proposed ban before Nebraska voters in November.

NU regents already have voted to oppose the ban.

Doug Tietz, executive director of the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative, an ally of Super Tuesday for Equal Rights, said concerns voiced Wednesday at the Board of Education meeting by state education and university staff about the initiative raised false alarms.

He said programs mentioned by the staff members as programs that might be vulnerable should the ban be passed would not, for the most part, be affected.

Student ethnic clubs, as long as they don’t prohibit students of certain ethnic groups from joining, likely would be allowed to continue to operate, Tietz said.

And outreach programs, like an annual Hispanic summit sponsored by the state Department of Education, would be encouraged.

He said he was frustrated to not have been given the chance to speak before the board about his group’s efforts.

“It’s unfortunate they weren’t concerned about hearing the other side of the argument,” he said. “Race preferences are on the way out.”


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Justice wrote on April 3, 2008 1:15 pm:
" I'm not sure why, in the time Presidential candidates of African American and female backgrounds, a period where two back to back Secretary of States have been african american, african american and female business ownership is rising, that we still promote minority races over others. Is gender and racial equality not enough? "

Diversity Jokes wrote on April 3, 2008 1:49 pm:
" Based on my extremely negative experiences at UNL, SCC and in Lincoln in general no otherwise
qualified person with any diversity-related issues would possibly want to willingly subject themselves
to the condescending scrutiny and out-and-out discrimination they are likely to receive at NE schools
either as a teacher or student. Hitch your Uhaul to a star and move to a more progressive before these insensitive people hurt you any worse. "

Diversity Jokes/typo fixed wrote on April 3, 2008 1:51 pm:
" Based on my extremely negative experiences at UNL, SCC and in Lincoln in general no otherwise
qualified person with any diversity-related issues would possibly want to willingly subject themselves
to the condescending scrutiny and out-and-out discrimination they are likely to receive at NE schools
either as a teacher or student. Hitch your Uhaul to a star and move to a more progressive place before these insensitive people hurt you any worse. "

What wrote on April 3, 2008 1:51 pm:
" We spend a great deal of time on a subject whose time has passed. Why are we afraid of ending affirmative action? Is it that the special interest groups would get less attention and government money to continue their causes? "

Brian wrote on April 3, 2008 1:58 pm:
" UNL puts this statement on everything: " The University of Nebraska-Lincoln does not discriminate based on gender, age, disability, race, color, religion, marital status, veteran’s status, national or ethnic origin, or sexual orientation."

The funny thing is they do discriminate. The ACT admissions score for 'students of color' is lower than other students. If a white student gets a 26 on their ACT they can't get into some programs while a 'student of color' can get a 26 and still get in just fine. Then they turn around and give illegal aliens in-state tuition. That's discriminating against all students not from Nebraska.

Equality shouldn't be some subjective term. Equal is equal, not preference for some over others. Saying that UNL doesn't discriminate is just feel good propaganda. In my opinion, UNL implements institutionalized discrimination that is turned around and called equality. "

Ej wrote on April 3, 2008 2:27 pm:
" Keep the hate alive! Keep pointing out the differences in people instead of treating all people the same. What are you going to gain with this resolution. Color doesn't stop progress anymore. We need to get rid of this mindset. There are more oppurtunities for people today than there ever was. Quit living in the past and look towards the future! "

Brainiac wrote on April 3, 2008 2:34 pm:
" Well, my relevant test scores are in the top-percentile
of college graduates, and test scores hardly scratch the surface of my professional and pre-professional accomplishments--nonetheless, UNL has subjected
me to breathtakingly inhumane and punitive discriminatory
treatment. Their cops and dishonest upper administration
even plotted to get my job slashed at an unrelated institution. Most UNL rhetoric consists of Orwellian doublespeak--especially unfortunately their non-discrimination statement.Where bad judgment so abounds democracy barely has a chance. "

foxspit wrote on April 3, 2008 2:43 pm:
" If Nebraskans want to provide incentives to get more female high school students enrolled in science, or provide incentives to help Hispanic students go to college, this amendment would prevent that. I think it's a bad idea to amend the constitution in such a way. "

ABR wrote on April 3, 2008 4:54 pm:
" I would really like to hear that they support ALL people being treated with dignity and respect. Leave all those other names out. The term "All People" should pretty well cover it. I wonder what issues didn't get addressed during this time. Such things as "How can we better educate students by showing teachers how to make "excellent lesson plans" Studies show the better a teacher can plan a lesson, the more students will learn. We shouldn't get away from the mission of education. We want kids to be able to read, write, and to math as well as think! "

AWP wrote on April 3, 2008 5:47 pm:
" The Board wouldn't even allow Mr. Tietz to address them? I thought educators encouraged open minded debate, inclusiveness, and were opposed to intolerance. By not hearing the other side of the issue before voting, they did not set a very good example. They don't have to agree with him, but at least be open minded before making a decision. "

Equality wrote on April 4, 2008 12:05 am:
" I find the wording in the first paragraph funny. "The board approved unanimously a resolution supporting diversity." I don't believe that Ward Connerly, his resolution, or anyone else was anit-diversity and trying to end it. They were simply against favoritism and benefits based on race, ethcicity, and gender. And I completely agree with Brain regarding the University's anti-discrmination policy. It's total hypocricy for them to say that when they offer scads of scholarships and employment oppurtunities to people completely based on the color of their skin. Isn't that discrimination based on race? Isn't everybody being treated as equals what we're trying to achieve as a society? Or is being equal not quite enough to make everyone happy? "

Laughable wrote on April 4, 2008 6:01 am:
" The same ones that want diversity are the same races calling their race cards when in advert situations. Affirmative action is good if used correctly and not as a toy like it has been. It is used to much for an "excuse". "

UNL Student and Emlpoyee wrote on April 4, 2008 10:07 am:
" To address some of the myths that lurk in this forum.

1. Brian your statement "The ACT admissions score for 'students of color' is lower than other students. If a white student gets a 26 on their ACT they can't get into some programs while a 'student of color' can get a 26 and still get in just fine." Its totally false the University recruits specific groups whether they may be by race, ethnic group, or gender. They do not admit by any other category except merit.

2. To Equality. I was there when Mr. Connerly spoke at UNL and I even got a exchange some words with him privately. He is indeed against the Government encouraging Diversity because he believed that people from different backgrounds interacted so much already that the government need not to play a role.

I would like to point everyone who agrees with Ward, too seek out the differences in between California, where Mr. Connerly is from and Nebraska where this ballot initiative would take place. "