Now
Overcast with Haze
54°
High
65°
Low
46°

High court to consider whether party hosts were negligent

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By OSKAR GARCIA / The Associated Press

Thursday, Mar 27, 2008 - 12:29:16 pm CDT

OMAHA — The Nebraska Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a case that has rekindled debate about the responsibilities of hosts who provide alcohol at parties.

The high court will hear arguments April 3 in a case involving whether a Denton couple should pay their adult stepson, who was paralyzed from the neck down after drinking at their home and then hitting his head on the side of their pool.

Lawyers for James Dondlinger said in court documents that the day of drinking alcohol created a “dangerous mix” when combined with after-dark swimming in an unfamiliar pool.

But a Lancaster County district judge ruled that Walter and Kimberly Dondlinger weren’t negligent.

“No one can look at the facts of this accident and not have some sympathy for James,” lawyers for Walter and Kimberly Dondlinger wrote in a brief in the case. “But sometimes accidents happen, and no one is at fault.”

According to court documents, the accident happened at a party during Labor Day weekend of 2005. James Dondlinger, who was 37 at the time, partially entered the pool and pushed off the side. He drifted to the other side of the pool and hit his head, fracturing his neck.

His lawyer, Clete Blakeman, said a combination of factors — including alcohol — led to the accident but were judged by the lower court separately from one another.

Blakeman said alcohol, along with darkness, unfamiliarity with the pool and the potential for injury should be considered whether they combined to create the danger.

“I don’t think there’s any black or white uniform rule that can mount from this, more of what’s reasonable and what isn’t in the eyes of a jury,” he said.

The couple’s lawyer, Randall Goyette, declined to comment on the case.

Nebraska’s current law for party hosts was passed last year and applies only to adults who give liquor to underage people. The law makes them liable for damages or injuries caused by intoxication, but only if the intoxication was caused by negligence.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
K. wrote on March 27, 2008 1:44 pm:
" Although this situation is unfortunate, James is a 37-year-old man who is capable of making his own decisions. He made the choice to drink, how much to drink, to swim in an unfamiliar pool, to go to the party, where in the pool to get in at...all of HIS decisons led to his accident. If James were a person under 21--the couple would be liable for ILLEGALLY supplying alcohol. Accidents happen but you can't put the blame on an innocent party--the couple didn't MAKE James do any of the things that he did. "

BB wrote on March 27, 2008 2:16 pm:
" There is no such thing as personal responsibility anymore ! It has to be someone else's fault that I got drunk and jumped in that pool!? "

tim wrote on March 27, 2008 3:37 pm:
" personal responsibility, END OF STORY. "

Ross wrote on March 28, 2008 3:00 am:
" I think there is little doubt what the opinion of the court will be regarding this issue. It is surprising to me the issues of personal responsibility regarding alcohol have not been clearly defined by previous cases. But if this has to be the one to hash it out over, so be it. At least we'll have a reference point for future litigation. "

Jim wrote on March 28, 2008 2:14 pm:
" He's suing his parents? What is this world coming to? "