Resolution apologizes for state’s role in slavery
BY JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star
Nebraska state senators may get an opportunity to join a handful of other states that have expressed regrets or apologized for their role in slavery.
Nebraska would be the first state west of the Mississippi River to do so. It would join Virginia, New Jersey, Maryland, North Carolina and Alabama. Other states — including Missouri and Florida — have broached the subject with their state governments.
Omaha Sen. Dwite Pedersen is sponsoring the Nebraska resolution introduced Thursday. He said his interest is letting people know the history of slavery in Nebraska and expressing regret for it.
“I don’t know anybody who doesn’t regret slavery,” he said. “My hope is that people in Nebraska get the history that slavery was here.”
Pedersen said people can’t apologize for something they didn’t do. But they can regret that it happened.
The resolution comes two days after Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s speech on race in Philadelphia. Some have said it opened up the conversation on race like it hasn’t been since the Civil Rights era.
The resolution says the “Legislature expresses its profound regret for the state’s role in slavery, especially during its territorial period prior to statehood, and apologizes for wrongs inflicted by slavery and its after effects in Nebraska and in the United States.”
It also expresses its deepest sympathies and solemn regrets to those who were enslaved and their descendants, who were deprived of life, human dignity and constitutional protections.
The resolution seeks to encourage all Nebraskans to teach their children about the history of slavery and its effects, especially concerning modern-day slavery, so such tragedies will be neither forgotten nor repeated.
And it says the resolution shall not be used in or as the basis for any litigation.
Pedersen said a constituent in Omaha asked him to introduce the resolution after researching the role Nebraska played in slavery. The man brought reams of research to Pedersen’s office.
“I found it very interesting,” he said.
The research showed that when the Kansas-Nebraska Act opened lands west of the Missouri River to white settlement in 1854, it allowed settlers to decide for themselves whether slavery would be allowed.
Nebraska was at the center of turmoil over the slavery issue, with Iowa being a free state and Missouri a slave state. The Missouri Compromise had intended that Kansas and Nebraska would have no slaves.
Sara Crook, history and political science professor at Peru State College, said the Kansas-Nebraska Act opened the wound of slavery, bringing controversy and heated debate, and greasing the slippery slide into civil war. People coming to Nebraska, and those stopping along the Missouri River, brought slaves with them.
The first territorial Legislature passed a resolution prohibiting “negroes and mulattoes” from settling here.
In 1858, a legislator introduced a bill to abolish slavery in the territory of Nebraska. Three on the committee that dealt with it favored the bill and two regretted its introduction, fearing it was introduced for political ambition.
It’s unclear how many slaves or slave owners lived in Nebraska, but any reports cite low numbers compared with southern states. In 1859, William Taylor introduced a bill to prohibit slavery in the territory, saying, “There is no distinction in principle between holding one human being in bondage and 10,000.”
In 1860, Crook said, 12 slaves were reported in the Nebraska City region, and the Nebraska News, published there, was pro-slavery. J. Sterling Morton, she said, wrote flaming pro-slavery editorials.
The Nebraska Territory did not ban slavery until 1861, because the appointed territorial governor at the time, Samuel Black, the son of a Presbyterian minister, twice vetoed the bill in 1860 and 1861.
Crook said that as a historian, she believes it is important for Nebraskans to understand the state’s role in slavery, including its participation in the underground railroad, a network of safe houses used in the 1800s to get slaves to free states.
Omaha Sen. Ernie Chambers said the fact that Pedersen introduced the resolution may cause it to have more impact than if he had.
The resolution will be referred to a committee for a public hearing, said Speaker Mike Flood. If it comes out of the committee, there’s a good chance it will be debated by the Legislature by the end of the session, he said.
Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
whatever wrote on March 20, 2008 10:09 pm:
rac wrote on March 21, 2008 12:25 am:
Warren wrote on March 21, 2008 4:58 am:
K wrote on March 21, 2008 5:13 am:
Dave wrote on March 21, 2008 7:47 am:
"DEBT DISCHARGE
Selling someone into slavery could be a way of discharging a debt.
FEEDING THE ORACLE
In Bonny, the largest slave market in the delta of the river Niger many slaves were sold by order of the oracle, Chukwu. The slaves were then sold to merchants, but the oracle was said to have eaten them.
TRIBUTE
In the area of Senegal, in the 17th century, slaves were given to the king as part of a village's tribute to him, along with brandy, tobacco and cloth.
KIDNAP
A large number of people were quite simply kidnapped while going about their everyday tasks. Igbos were particularly wary of being kidnapped and always fortified their houses if they left their villages; but some like Olaudah Equiano were caught unawares.
Elsewhere in West Africa Savanna horsemen would sweep down from the north to launch annual slave raids on agricultural people.
Occasionally Europeans would kidnap people and turn them into slaves, although by doing this they ran the risk of annoying the chain of African middlemen which extended from the interior to the coast.
"It was customary for parties of sailors and coast blacks to lie in wait near the streams and little villages, and seize the stragglers by twos and threes when they were fishing or cultivating their patches of corn."
Richard Drake, recalling life under the command of Captain Fraley of Bristol, whom he served in 1805." "
Tim wrote on March 21, 2008 8:45 am:
Gerard Harbison wrote on March 21, 2008 9:04 am:
So the state is going to apologize for what it did before existed. This can't be serious!
"
why wrote on March 21, 2008 9:15 am:
Saline Co. Guy wrote on March 21, 2008 10:53 am:
Get a life. Get a clue. Don't waste public time and resources with your white, liberal guilt. If you're that committed, join Rev. Wright's church. "
mike wrote on March 21, 2008 11:42 am:
Nina wrote on March 21, 2008 12:10 pm:
Publius wrote on March 21, 2008 12:30 pm:
Can we move on now? "
Josh wrote on March 21, 2008 12:41 pm:
What a Waste wrote on March 21, 2008 12:55 pm:
CS wrote on March 21, 2008 1:38 pm:
A Nebraskan wrote on March 21, 2008 2:31 pm:
Blame the right people wrote on March 21, 2008 3:18 pm:
This is the kind of idiotic bill that Ernie would be fighting tooth-and-nail if it weren't about the long dead ancestors of modern-day African Americans. "
Scott wrote on March 21, 2008 3:45 pm:
tim wrote on March 21, 2008 3:47 pm:
Mary wrote on March 21, 2008 4:06 pm:
you're missing the point wrote on March 21, 2008 4:14 pm:
pr wrote on March 21, 2008 4:35 pm:
Ej wrote on March 21, 2008 5:04 pm:
No Way wrote on March 21, 2008 5:06 pm:
Gerard Harbison wrote on March 21, 2008 5:38 pm:
However, slavery among Native American tribes was endemic. The Pawnee, who inhabited much of modern-day Nebraska, were so often taken into slavery by other tribes that (according to Lauber (1913)), the word 'Pawnee' actually became synonymous with 'slave'. So while the state legislature has little reason to apologize for slavery, perhaps the local native tribes might consider an apology? "
me wrote on March 21, 2008 6:05 pm:
Procedural Geek wrote on March 21, 2008 6:27 pm:
First off, it's a proposed 'resolution' not a bill. Secondly the Senator who introduced it was Dwite Pedersen, a term-limited guy who's been around a while in the legislature with very little to do except count down the days of retirement from the angry Nebraskans he hears almost on a daily basis. I don't blame him for introducing this 'resolution' becausee he's an old work horse ready to pasture out in Elkhorn (a.k.a West Omaha).
Funny to note, Sen. Pedersen is a registered Republican in Douglas County. How can you label Republicans with "white, liberal guilt" because doesn't that go against former past President's 'Golden Rule.'? I would check Sen. Pedersen's record before you go accusing him something that he's actually really not.... "
disappointed wrote on March 21, 2008 7:58 pm:
Eddie wrote on March 21, 2008 9:02 pm:
I suppose next up is a bill to raise the salary of our fine representatives..... "
Dr. J wrote on March 21, 2008 9:37 pm:
Jocko wrote on March 21, 2008 9:56 pm:
JPB wrote on March 21, 2008 10:04 pm:
Indians: no taxes on profits from casinos on Indian reservations.
Negroes?
No one living today is accountable or responsible for some of the same racist views that existed during slavery that are still alive today...no need to apologize...right? "
Now for the rest of the story wrote on March 21, 2008 10:49 pm:
Just wondering wrote on March 21, 2008 10:57 pm:
Jason wrote on March 22, 2008 7:42 am:
Mark wrote on March 22, 2008 7:44 am:
I support wrote on March 22, 2008 9:20 am:
Rev. Wright wrote on March 22, 2008 12:12 pm:
Judy wrote on March 22, 2008 1:52 pm:
monty wrote on March 22, 2008 2:14 pm:
Joe wrote on March 22, 2008 2:20 pm:
Rob wrote on March 22, 2008 3:32 pm:
Kevin wrote on March 22, 2008 4:09 pm:
Come ON wrote on March 22, 2008 4:11 pm:
To Rob wrote on March 22, 2008 9:49 pm:
John B wrote on March 22, 2008 11:12 pm:
Rusty Shackleford wrote on March 23, 2008 1:19 am:
"
JB wrote on March 23, 2008 8:18 am:
JB wrote on March 23, 2008 8:25 am:
Read The Article! wrote on March 23, 2008 6:35 pm:
Hjalmer wrote on March 24, 2008 6:23 am:
WCG wrote on March 24, 2008 10:20 am: