Now
Mostly Cloudy
57°
High
75°
Low
51°

Letters, 3/12: Better uses for federal funds

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 - 12:32:51 am CDT

Let me get this straight:  At a cost of nearly $42 million, the IRS wants us to know that our checks are almost in the mail. This government agency is spending the money on a letter to alert taxpayers to expect rebate checks as part of the economic stimulus plan.

It seems to me that the Bush administration could find countless better uses for this money than a self-congratulatory mailer that gives the president a pat on the back for an idea that wasn’t even his.

This is the same logic used by the president in 2003, when troops invaded Iraq and he predicted that the war would be self-financing and that the rebuilding of the nation would cost less than $2 billion. The same astute planning has seen the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan cost the American taxpayer more than $3 trillion.

Bob Pinkerton, Weeping Water

Donate those old computers

On behalf of Lincoln Action Program, I would like to thank Lee Enterprises for its recent publication of Go Green in the Lincoln Journal Star. Go Green presented simple actions for residents to adopt in pursuit of a cleaner and safer environment.  

Of particular interest was the article entitled “eWASTE: Obsolete electronic gadgets fill landfills.” This article included information on the growing numbers of obsolete electronics and the potential harm to our environment as a result of improper disposal.

Also, the article included suggestions for consumers to consider when disposing of outdated electronics. Although very good, these suggestions were limited to options through major electronics companies.  

I would like to remind Lincoln residents of one local opportunity for recycling computer systems. Lincoln Action Program’s computer recycling program, which is funded in part by a grant from the state Department of Environmental Quality Litter Reduction and Recycling Grant Program, provides an outlet for local businesses, agencies and individuals to responsibly dispose of their obsolete computer systems.

Donated computers are refurbished and distributed to local organizations and to Lincoln Action Program clients, who successfully complete program requirements on their path to economic self-sufficiency.

In addition, the program provides for the safe disposal of electronics that are unable to be reused. In 2008, the agency will divert about 1,200 computer systems from disposal and distribute 300 refurbished computers. 

Sue Hinrichs, Lincoln,

executive director, Lincoln Action Program


Dreams for children dashed

Pleasant Hill Elementary and four other Class I schools were assimilated with Kearney Public Schools as a result of LB126. And Pleasant Hill will be the third Class I school closed by Kearney schools.

The reason stated was financial, even though the school receives less than

0.5 percent of the total $50 million Kearney schools budget. Because of an increase in transportation costs (they have to buy a new bus and pay for the fuel), it could be years before they see any savings from closing Pleasant Hill. 


Pleasant Hill is a small school with multi-grade classrooms. A multi-grade classroom gives students the opportunity to be exposed to ideas and concepts that are part of the next grade level.

As a kindergartner, my son listened to the first-grade discussion of coins; he came home and practiced counting and identifying coins before they covered it in his class. We practiced math facts for months before it was covered because of the early exposure to adding and subtracting.

Kearney Public Schools went through the motions — they had a couple of meetings with parents. The truth is a small school doesn’t fit their mold and they cannot or will not adjust.

As news began to circulate about Pleasant Hill closing, the comment from a school board member was that there was no opposition. It is difficult to stand your ground against an entity that holds your child’s future in their hands.

My husband and I moved from Colorado to Nebraska and built our house in Pleasant Hill School District so that our children could attend Pleasant Hill, and because of a senator from Lincoln, that dream for our children will not happen.

Carla Kegley-Owen, Kearney

Anti-illegal bills aren’t racist

How dare Ernie Chambers and any of the other senators refer to illegal immigration bills as “racist.” This is just a tactic to make people feel guilty who are angry about illegal immigrants being given privileges that should be reserved for legal citizens.

It’s not about the color of the skin, it’s about “illegal.” The senators seem to want to overlook this fact. So, if being upset over the fact that illegal immigrants are being granted all these privileges makes me a racist, then label me racist!

Sandra Lab, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Doug Sirek wrote on March 12, 2008 6:43 am:
" The Lincoln Action Program's computer recycling program is awesome. My company donated 40 systems to them, they even came out and picked everything up. We're able to clear up space in our office and not have to worry about how we were going to properly dispose of the systems. "

ok, you're a racist wrote on March 12, 2008 7:41 am:
" Sandra, i hate to say it, but the bill in question is a feel good bill largely supported by people who do not like other people because they have brown skin and speak Spanish. Its already illegal to give illegal immegrants benefits, which is why this bill was shot down. We have better things to do with our senators time than debate a bill making it illegal to do something that is already illegal. This is nothing but feel good legislation that Hinney man is pushing to pander to his very zenophobic base. How many of these people who are crying at the demise of this bill would call it a waste of taxpayer moneies to start debate on a bill to make speeding illegal? Probrably all of them. Why would they be mad? Because speeding is already illegal, we don't need another law on the books saying its illegal. Its the same thing with Hinney mans bill. "

Hey Bob wrote on March 12, 2008 7:54 am:
" I agree that the money spent on the stimulus plan could have been put to much better use. However, it's quite a stretch to link that decision with the decision to go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan. War is expensive, that's reality. Do you want to save some real money? Tell Congress to cut the pork and to cut some of these ridiculous domestic programs. "

BobRight wrote on March 12, 2008 8:39 am:
" Bob is right. The decider and the estimator were wrong both times and by a long, long ways. Cutting Haliburton pork would be a great place to start too. Ever see what they charge us for a case of water or a small dorm style cooler? The greed is beyond belief. "

CS wrote on March 12, 2008 8:48 am:
" Racist is not just color of skin, its an aversion to other races, and holding one race as superior over another. These bills are racist in their inception because they serve no purpose whatsoever except to harass a particular group of people by reminding them that "we know you are here" and creating an atmosphere of suspicion where there is no need.Because of federal law, and that no State Agency can produce any factual data showing that illegal immigrants are receiving benefits, I have to conclude that the bills creation is only to move its creator to the limelight for his 15 minutes. "

PorkDoom wrote on March 12, 2008 8:53 am:
" McCain says he will eliminate pork. And Cheney said the people of Iraq will greet us. And Bush said the war will cost one billion then declared it over prematurely. Yes, look to the GOP to reduce government and solve all your problems. Their track record proves it. "

Grundle wrote on March 12, 2008 9:08 am:
" The comment by "ok, you're a racist", is insulting in nature, and doesn't do a whole lot to raise the level of discussion. Yes, it's already illegal for illegal immigrants to receive benefits, but can you tell me who enforces the laws that make it illegal? This bill would give power to the law enforcement agencies in Nebraska, who typically do not have the power to enforce those laws, thus they are easy to break. Many opponents of this bill cry out, "but there's no proof that illegals receive benefits!", to which I respond, "there's no proof that they don't." And given the fact we give illegal immigrants in-state tuition at our universities (something that other legal U.S. citizens living out of state don't get), it seems to me that indeed, illegals are receiving benefits. "

Nelly wrote on March 12, 2008 9:27 am:
" Carla, I hear you, but don't agree with your example about your son and learning about coins. What about the older kids who have to hear about things they learned years ago?

And Bob, we should dish out more money to other countries than help our own? I don't think so. "

Edited wrote on March 12, 2008 9:52 am:
" Its fine for people to blast President Bush on his wasteful spending, but I call on those also to hold Democrats like Sen. Hillary Clinton to task for proposing a costly universal Health Care system that has no means test. Don't tolerate the wasteful spending or proposed wasteful spending of some because you think their heart may be in the right place. "

Cat wrote on March 12, 2008 10:01 am:
" Yes, Ms. Lab, it's not about the color of the skin...But can you really tell me that the previously proposed bills wouldn't have targeted those of a specific complexion and speech? Would state agencies really run a check (at a cost of about a quarter a person) on -everyone-? Or only those with the skin and linguistic aspects of Hispanic? "

Hey OK .. wrote on March 12, 2008 10:14 am:
" ok, you're a racist wrote:

I do not see anything in Sandra's letter about "brown" skin or "speaking spanish". Looks to me like you are the one trying to stir the pot against a select group.

It does not matter if they are spanish, european, african, or whatever, ILLEGAL IS ILLEGAL.

Sandra is correct in that many of the so called lawmakers are employing tatics to keep them in the spotlight. Mr. Chambers has been wasting government time for years. "

W wrote on March 12, 2008 11:26 am:
" Okay, everyone, for the last time-Yes, illegal immigrants are receiving federal assistance-it's called WIC & Medicaid. All a women has to do is get pregnant & she is completely covered for all her pregnancy care, dental care, etc under Medicaid & receives free milk, cheese, etc under WIC, bc "technically," her unborn child is a US citizen. I work as an RN for Medicaid, so I would probably know this-so here's your "factual data," CS. "

Jeff wrote on March 12, 2008 12:00 pm:
" Some of the testimony at the public hearing held by the legislature clearly had a racist tone to it. Like the guy who knew the hispanic lady using food stamps was an "illegal", even though he had no way to know that she was an illegal, and was simply jumping to the conclusion based on her appearance or the fact that she was speaking Spanish. Also - when you include measures such as the in-state tuition repeal, which would have no direct effect on solving the illegal immigrant problem and would only punish a handful of young people who had basically grew up in our state and our school system. It would take away their dreams, and would benefit no one. The cost for this small number of kids is meaningless, and they would still be paying the tuition everyone pays. "

CS wrote on March 12, 2008 12:03 pm:
" Still anecdotal, and you have to do more than "get pregnant"to qualify as my wife used WIC for awhile when we were first married. We had to fill out reams of paperwork and verify ID and wages several times IN NE, where the case lady tried to count my financial aid and student loans as income until we got another case worker. WIC and Medicaid are also FEDERAL programs, so, once again, what good does a STATE law do? It enforces nothing. "

Jeff wrote on March 12, 2008 12:08 pm:
" "Edited" took at shot at Hillary and the potential cost of universal healthcare. He (she) is apparently not aware that our current system is one of the highest cost systems among industrialized nations, and that in return we have the highest rate of preventable deaths. More than 100,000 Americans dies each year from lack of timely, effective medical care, which was the worst of 19 industrialized nations. You see, people without insurance delay getting care, then need hospitalization, and the costs all get shifted to taxpayers and those who have insurance. Hillary's plan might SAVE YOU MONEY. I know you won't hear that on right wing radio or Hannity's America - but its the truth. Also -we need to negotiate drug prices from a stronger position so we are subsidizing drug price in Canada, Europe, and Mexico. It doesn't have to be a carbon copy of Canada's system, but we've GOT to get more bang for our healthcare buck. Please keep an open mind on this issue, for my pocket book as well as yours "

Edited wrote on March 12, 2008 12:21 pm:
" Jeff don't assume I get my marching orders from anyone let alone right wing talk radio. I don't. You deliberately avoid addressing the fact that Sen. Clinton's proposal is not means tested. In other words there is no provision to find those who are merely opting out of coverage even though it is within their means. Some love to blast the GOP on their track record of wasteful spending, but refuse to acknowledge that the Democrats have one that is equally as abysmal. Former President Clinton's budget surplus was largely overrated considering working families were over taxed in the 1990s, just as much as they are now. Surpluses and new programs should only come when there is sound fiscal policy and substantial cuts in federal spending that don't place unfair burdens on the tax payer. "

Right On Carla wrote on March 12, 2008 1:53 pm:
" You are so right Carla. Unfortunately you are not alone. Across the state K-12 schools are closing the former Class I's. Just last night our local K-12 voted to close ours as well. This was despite the fact that there will be zero savings by doing so. In fact,closing the school will probably actually cost more. When confronted about the lack of savings closing the school, the board and administration had absolutely no comment. So what we have is no savings and 2 hour bus rides to and from school for rural children. Thanks Raikes for a more equitable education. I'm betting there is not a single town parent that would be happy if their child had to be on a bus that long everyday. "

Jeff wrote on March 12, 2008 2:38 pm:
" Hillary was backing "universal care" that didn't allow opt outs, at least that's what I understood. Besides, we know that whatever Hillary's plan is - it won't be accepted "as is", but at least its a basis upon which to start a real negotiating a real solutions. Nothing could be more costly than what we have, including a prescription drug coverage program for the elderly that doesn't allow price negotiation on pharmaceuticals. We keep paying 2-3 times as much for drugs in this country so that Canada and Europe can get them dirt cheap, while drug companies raise their drug prices at twice the rate of inflation each year, and make double digit profit margins. And what do you get for that? More male erectile dysfunction drugs, more antihistamines, anti-gastric reflux drugs, sleep aids, and direct to consumer advertising, which is a waste of money unless you own a TV network. Never has anything cried out for regulation in for the public good like healthcare is. Or.... we can watch our pocketbooks shrink and jobs head overseas. Take your pick. "

stignob wrote on March 12, 2008 2:51 pm:
" Funny how some people "care" about our issues with health care and state we're at the bottom of the industrialized world, but when it comes to public schools they see no need to change, even they too are at the bottom. Seems politically driven, lets nationalize it ALL! "

Bert wrote on March 12, 2008 3:29 pm:
" AMEN Sandra. I cannot see why the senators can't see that they are allowing law breakers to break laws. Enablers they are called. What part they don't get about
illegal immiigrants are breaking our laws. So much for
higher education that the Senators claim makes them know
whatis best for us. "

over 60 wrote on March 12, 2008 3:58 pm:
" Now where nov comes around remember the decider and cheney and who in the party wants to follow their path. Remember how far this country is in the hole with china holding the notes. Remember this that the rebate bush is giving is borrowed money from china. Call me racist but I intend to vote for a black man for president. Sandra is right about chambers, he is racism at its finest. The country is 7 trillion dollars in debt that even my grandchildren will pay on. They should simplify this whole thing and impeach bush and cheney and let polosi finish their term. I have always been quiet law obiding person, but, this bunch in the white house proves that crime does pay. "

Zoomie wrote on March 13, 2008 2:47 pm:
" Edited - Clinton's healthcare plan is universal, with no opt-out allowed. What part of "universal" don't you understand? There is no means-testing, because everyone is covered, all the time. And at a lower cost to taxpayers than we already pay to private insurers and to cover gov't covered healthcare costs! Oh, and in the Clinton years, EVERY income group saw real, after-inflation growth in income virtually every year; since 2001, the bottom 70% of Americans have had flat or negative income growth! So the taxes may have been fractionally higher for most Americans, but you ended up with more money in your pocket every year, even after you paid those taxes! Unlike now, when you have less money every year AND our national debt doubles in just 8yrs to almost $10 Trillion! "