Now
Overcast
61°
High
73°
Low
56°

Report criticizes 'opportunity hiring'

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By MELISSA LEE / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Mar 06, 2008 - 12:39:54 am CST

University of Nebraska-Lincoln Chancellor Harvey Perlman was hoping for a diversity plan, a faculty- and student-generated statement on how UNL could best recruit and retain women and minorities.

What he got was a report largely written by a pair of faculty accusing UNL of violating Board of Regents bylaws by making more than 20 percent of its faculty hires from 1998 to 2004 without competitive searches with the goal of boosting its racial and gender mix.

During that time, according to the report, UNL made 61 of its 301 faculty hires without announcing and advertising its open positions.

Of those 61 hires, all but 16 were women or racial minorities, says the report, dated Feb. 29.

The faculty who wrote the report — David Moshman, an educational psychology professor, and Dwayne Ball, an associate professor of marketing — call such hiring practices, commonly known as “opportunity hiring,” inconsistent with regents bylaws forbidding race- and gender-based discrimination.

“I can’t see any way you could reconcile what actually goes on with opportunity hires with regents bylaws,” Moshman said. “I don’t see how the university could defend that.”

The university says its hires are perfectly compatible with regents policies, which prohibit discrimination but also encourage affirmative action in some cases to increase the number of women and minorities in fields in which they are underrepresented.

The Legislature, in fact, provided state money to NU to increase diversity after it mandated in 1997 that the university reach the midpoint of its peer institutions in employment of women and minority faculty or risk losing funding, said Linda Crump, assistant to the chancellor for equity, access and diversity programs at UNL.

Opportunity hires rose in the years after that mandate, Crump said, but they’ve since slowed dramatically.

In the 2006-2007 year, for example, just two faculty came to UNL without competitive searches, Crump said.

Many opportunity hires aren’t even related to race or gender, she said. The university sometimes has to act quickly to hire a research faculty member before grant money runs out and can’t waste time on a search, for example.

Further, she said, non-competitive hires only happen with the support of the faculty in a given department.

“If the faculty want to do a full search, guess what, we’re doing a full search,” she said. “And the bottom line is, if you’re not a stellar candidate, you’re not going to talk to us.

“Race or gender is never the sole factor (in a hire). We follow the law.”

Regents Chairman Chuck Hassebrook of Lyons hasn’t seen Moshman’s and Ball’s report, but said opportunity hires are appropriate in rare cases.

“They have a place,” Hassebrook said.

Perlman is disappointed in the report, Crump said. She questioned whether the report reflects the views of most faculty.

Crump, in fact, was one of the original members of the faculty senate’s diversity committee, appointed about a year ago to draft goals for diversity at UNL.

She resigned after a few meetings, citing time conflicts.

In all, five of eight committee members stepped down, some saying they didn’t want to be part of a report that criticized opportunity hiring instead of stating specific goals related to diversity.

That left Moshman, Ball and a UNL senior to endorse the document.

The report already has generated unrest among senior faculty senate members and is likely to face more dissent when the full senate discusses it next month, said president Steve Bradford.

“It’s not what I expected,” said Bradford, a law professor. “Harvey (Perlman) is clearly disappointed. The executive committee is not happy with the report. I believe there will be substantial discussion.”

Moshman, meanwhile, said he has no objection to rare opportunity hires.

Should a Nobel Prize winner move to Lincoln and seek a job at UNL, for example, there’s no need for the university to conduct a search before snapping that person up, he said.

But prioritizing racial and gender diversity is wrong, he said.

After all, UNL has low numbers of Republicans, too. But Moshman has never heard of an opportunity hire based on political diversity.

“The university gets really concerned with counting how many women and minorities there are,” he said. “Well, the underrepresentation of Republicans is at least as serious as the underrepresentation of women and minorities. But nobody would even talk about a special hire to get a Republican. Nobody would even dream about it.”

Reach Melissa Lee at 473-2682 or mlee@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Moshman is laughable wrote on March 6, 2008 6:38 am:
" You choose to be a Republican - you don't choose to be a woman or minority. You also can't tell by looking at someone if they're a Republican or Democrat or any other affiliation. To suggest that's the same is ridiculous. Also, this report or the article on this report is incomplete. 16 were not women or minorities - that's assuming they're white males. So does that mean they were hired based on their "white maleness" or because they were highly sought after? Were the women and minorities marked that they were hired specifically because of their gender or ethnicity, or is the assumption that everyone whose hire was desginated as increasing diversity was hired specifically for that reason (i.e. that no women or minorities would ever be specifically targeted by a department for a hire) How many of these opportunity hires were because they were spouses of candidates? In particular knowing that would certainly drop the number of females viewed as "opportunity hires." "

Interesting wrote on March 6, 2008 7:04 am:
" The name Harvey Perlman keeps appearing when ever the University is making a mistake or forcing things down people's throats. Remember the bonus and firing of Peterson followed by the removal of the football coach after his bonus. Remember who started the push to take the state fair grounds from the citizens of the state. Remember the conflict of interest by serving on the fair board while pushing to take it for UNL. Now this issue. Just exactly what is this man's agenda and why isn't he held accountable. He will be remembered as the Nebraskan who killed the state fair. His name is always reflective of something negative happening.











"

Jose J. Soto wrote on March 6, 2008 7:17 am:
" Sheer silliness... disingenuous and inane:

“Well, the underrepresentation of Republicans is at least as serious as the underrepresentation of women and minorities." "

Hadrian wrote on March 6, 2008 7:34 am:
" All diversity is not laughable. Why should a university not support equal representation in thought as well? I fully support hiring faculty of diverse backgrounds including race and gender. But for a university to fail to recognize the benefits of diversity of thought are equally as laughable. Continuing to cater to specific groups, no matter who they are, will only perpetuate the diversity problems we face in Nebraska today. "

quanity? wrote on March 6, 2008 7:57 am:
" I am sick and tired of this gender,minority junk. I dont care if the person hired is a women, male, black, white, blue or green.We should hire the person most qualified, and not be forced to hire anyone else no matter what,period. I am sick of these laws and expecially the PEOPLE who say we have to hire quanity, not quality. I for one have supportd my last dollar to this university and the fact that I do believe education is the future I will continue to give,only to a different college.One of you colleges will notice I have given up my support for UNL when you recieve my donation. I run my business on quality, not quanity and that is why is has succeded. Try to get a job with me on what you are instead of who you are and you will not succeed. "

Huh wrote on March 6, 2008 8:32 am:
" So this "committee" of two focused on 20% of hires (less than 15% if you actually just count women and minority hires that they target) that occurred over three years ago under a mandate from the unicameral that is no longer in practice. As opposed to say, actually looking at whether or not the university has issues with diversity. Did they ever consider looking at the vast majority of hires made by the university and seeing whether or not racism or sexism played a role in who got those jobs? "

frankly wrote on March 6, 2008 8:49 am:
" I believe these two professors should do what they were hired to do.
Why bring up if your a republican? Moshman should continue to teach students how to deal with people going through depression from this great republican war machine rowing us down the river to nowhere, you know people who have lost children or have them going to war not to return the same. As for professor Ball, he should concentrate on, well, marketing, the economy is so great because of republicans all his students are sure to get high paying jobs like him with great benefits maybe they can get us out of this forclosure mess or least buy up some of these properties at cut rate prices.

Maybe some of these hires are from say Korea and on break through research on how kill serious forms of bacteria that kills corn, or something very meaningful for the human race. Sounds like these two would say "no we better have a search instead of hiring a woman from Korea who is smarter than us".
I don't think it would matter then if your a republican or a democtrat
would it. "

Gerard Harbison wrote on March 6, 2008 9:03 am:
" David Moshman is a founder member of the Academic Freedom Coalition of Nebraska and wrote AFCON"s constitution. He won UNL's James A Lake Academic Freedom award in 1997. He won honorable mention of the NCTE National Intellectual Freedom award in 2006. He's on ACLU of Nebraska's board of directors.


"

tim wrote on March 6, 2008 9:15 am:
" 'a pair of faculty'? since this story seems to be about race and gender wouldnt it be prudent to know the race and or gender of the faculty drafting this accusation. sounds like unl is promoting from within its own system which is good for retention, lessens the chance of a bad hire and boost moral. perlman should have handed the document back to the staff members and told them to do the job they were instructed to do. sounds like perlman was taking a proactive approach to help formulate a better hiring plan. "

I am woman wrote on March 6, 2008 9:39 am:
" I do not agree that anyone should be hired just because they are a woman or a minority. I want to be hired because I am the best canidate. It is discremination when a person is NOT hired because they are a white man. What about their rights? If a white man is more qualified than me, he deserves the job, I do not. If they give the job to me and I am not as qualified as him, I will not be able to provide the quality service. I have strong doubts that UNL is doing this opportunity hiring just because these people are white men, they are doing it because they have the OPPORTUNITY - hireing the people saves them time and money. Now they will have to spend more money to try and find a woman/minority that might not be as qualified? What a JOKE!!! I can see that 20 or 30 years ago this may have been a problem, but today is a lot different. It is normal for a woman/ minority to have the same ability to get a job. This law needs reviewed / removed. "

WWTOD wrote on March 6, 2008 9:41 am:
" I find it interesting that the fact that Harvey Pearlman is "disappointed" is mentioned three times in the story, but with no direct quote from Pearlman.

Sounds like the message is being sent... Harvey didn't get what he wants and he's not happy. This is not good, Nebraska... Harvey always gets what he wants. If the State Fair Board and other fair supporters get steamrolled by Harvey, it sounds like this professors will be out of a job soon. "

Gerard Harbison wrote on March 6, 2008 10:09 am:
" The committee started with eight members. The administration's representatives all quit, Linda Crump saying she had time conflicts. The other members could have come up with an alternative draft of their own, or they could have modified the Chairman's draft. Instead, they quit as well.

One of the great rules of life is if you want something, you've first got to show up.






"

Brian wrote on March 6, 2008 10:39 am:
" So much focus on gender and race. So little focus on qualifications. Policy that focuses on race hurt the quality of education because it's not a fair competitive process. Equality is all I ask for.

If you're applying for a job at UNL, in your resume put Race: Not White, in very big letters and you've already got a huge advantage over the majority of Nebraskans. "

Against the Law wrote on March 6, 2008 10:41 am:
" UNL is dancing on the knife's edge here. Title VII prohibits taking a person's race or sex into account when hiring. They're setting themselves up to lose a lawsuit by doing this. "

Opportunity wrote on March 6, 2008 10:54 am:
" Harvey Perlman is a white male. When are we going to have the "opportunity" to replace him with a female and/or minority? If diversity is so important at UNL he should fired to provide that opportunity. After all, at UNL it's always okay and even encouraged to discriminate against a white male.

"

So... wrote on March 6, 2008 11:12 am:
" Did you miss the part where people resigned because of what the document produced said, Gerard? They made their voices heard when they did that. I'm sure their voices will be heard when the full senate meets next month, as well.

And Brian - perhaps you missed the part where there were all of 2 opportunity hires in 2006-2007 - and it's not stated whether they were even women or minorities hired. So to suggest that there is this "So much focus on gender and race" is ridiculous." and to claim that by not being white gives you a huge advantage in this state - where the number of minority students and faculty is still very low - is also ridiculous. Don't try to make your argument with wild exaggerations and parnoia.

Finally - why no focus on the majority of hires that take place in full searches? Are the people so opposed to these few hires willing to admit that sexism and racism are still very much a part of our society and therefore do end up playing a role in who does and does not get jobs. Are you not concerned about this? "

Joe wrote on March 6, 2008 11:24 am:
" Maybe this article explains why I didn't get a job I applied for in maintenance and was qualified for with the right schooling. They posted the job again in the LJS a couple of weeks after I applied and had an interview. I am a white male in my early forties. "

Jibstance wrote on March 6, 2008 11:35 am:
" Call all races and genders equal, that's the right policy. Then the just hire the best candidates based on qualifications. Anyone against that?

Equality should be the priority, not racial or gender preference. To say women and minorities need 'special considerations' because they're a woman or minority says they can't compete on a level playing field. I believe talented, intelligent people are not determined by race or color, therefore no 'special help' should be given to any gender or minority.

I agree, if you want real diversity, get some more diversity at the top because the fact is, currently, white guys rule the country, state and university.
"

John B. wrote on March 6, 2008 11:45 am:
" "Opportunity hiring" in a public institution (and in many segments of the private sector) is illegal. Employment openings must be posted to allow qualified applicants the chance to apply, interview, and be hired. This issue is bigger than race, gender, or religious preference; it's about following the law. To suggest discrimination exists solely because of numbers is a trap we keep falling into. "

Mischaracterizations wrote on March 6, 2008 1:52 pm:
" First of all, Moshman comparing hiring based on gender/race and hiring based on political ideology is not even apples to oranges...its fruits to vegetables. Race and gender are protected classes (bestowing upon them certain legal benefits), while political ideology is not. That's why you can do certain things based on race or gender but not on political ideology and vice versa. For example, you cannot redraw political district lines on the basis of sex or race, but you can on political ideology...because political ideology is not a protected class. In addition, my understanding is that some of these "opportunity hires" are trailing spouses of excellent faculty or staff members...and they want their spouse to have a position as a condition of coming to UNL. And I my guess is most trailing spouses are women following their husband's career. "

KrissyK wrote on March 6, 2008 4:17 pm:
" Every time something even remotely related to race/gender equality-hiring issues come up, it's obvious that a bunch of white men start posting things about how unnecessary it is, and that people get where they are based on their amazing superior abilities--NOT SO. I'm sure there are plenty of women who have observed this, even had it happen to them. I've seen people with no college education who can't write or spell to save their lives, get promoted over myself and other women at a particular job that I was at for eight years. The guys were 'sick' every Monday and/or Friday. I used two sick days that entire year--they ran out. They read ESPN on the internet every day, and it was evident to others pretty much every time they walked by.....this was just ONE position where I experienced. My boss was an equally uh, 'exemplary' employee. You have no idea, if you are one of the 'good ol' boys', what really goes on. OR, you're a part of it, but refuse to acknowledge it. Whatever. "

Reality Vs. Rhetoric wrote on March 6, 2008 7:02 pm:
" Perceptive officials at UNL recognize and reward that
"stellar candidate" every time, right? It's great to
know the university is in the hands of those with unquestionable integrity. Ha, ha. Even the former poet laureate is only a part-time employee. "

Diversity in Society Class at "UN el" wrote on March 6, 2008 7:11 pm:
" we have jobs... so there.... "

David Moshman wrote on March 7, 2008 10:29 am:
" I'm glad to see discussion of these important issues. Let me clarify a few points: The diversity committee agreed that its final report would include ideas and suggestions from any committee member who wished to contribute. Five members of the committee ultimately chose to resign from the committee rather than contribute to its final report, and the remaining three reached consensus on a final document. The final committee of three was diverse with respect to both race and sex, as were those who resigned. And just for the record, I am not now, and have never been, a Republican. "