Now
Fair
76.0°
High
87°
Low
64°

City pitches standards for Antelope Valley and beyond

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

Monday, Mar 03, 2008 - 10:50:35 am CST

George Crandall was attending a groundbreaking ceremony in Racine, Wis., where his consulting firm had done an award-winning downtown development plan.

He asked the developer why he’d decided to do a project in Racine, and the developer said, “Because the city has decided what it wants to be when it grows up.”

Crandall likes to think his Portland company’s guide for the future had something to do with that.

Story Photo
Construction continues on "O" Street as part of the Antelope Valley Project. A proposed package of new codes and design standards for the project will govern new development in a large area of Lincoln, from K and L streets north to the state fairgrounds. (Heidi Hoffman)

Related Media

Antelope Valley reseach and developement corridor

Map of the proposed research and developement corridor for the Antelope Valley project....

Public meetings

To learn more about the proposed research corridor master plan and design standards, attend one of these public meetings:

* Downtown property owners are invited to meet at noon Tuesday in the lower-level dining room of St. Paul United Methodist Church, 1144 M St., or on March 10 at 5:30 p.m. in classroom 155.

* Property owners in the research corridor are invited to meet March 12 at 5:30 p.m. at Elliott Elementary School, 225 S. 25th St., East entrance, Room B112.

* Residents of nearby neighborhoods are invited to meet at 7 p.m. on March 18 in the lower level dining room of St. Paul United Methodist Church, 1144 M St.

For more information, visit www.lincoln.ne.gov/city/urban/AVindex.htm.

And he hopes Lincoln city officials will be similarly convinced of the value of the road maps his company has helped write for Lincoln’s Antelope Valley Project area.

The proposed package of new codes and design standards would govern new development or redevelopment in a huge swath of Lincoln from K and L streets north through a proposed research and development corridor that could extend all the way to the state fairgrounds.

After a month or two of public meetings, a final package of rules governing future construction in the area will likely be ready for City Council consideration sometime this spring.

Now that the $238 million Antelope Valley Project is inching toward completion, the Lincoln attorney who has helped shepherd the project from the start, Kent Seacrest, says it’s time to make sure that what develops in the corridor is what the city wants to see.

He said several big and small companies are knocking on the city’s door, interested in investing in the Antelope Valley area, but they want some assurance that their investment will be protected — from a car wash opening up next door, for example.

“They will go where they feel safe and where the development environment is predictable,” Crandall said.

Urban Development Department Director David Landis acknowledges he’s already getting some pushback from developers who bristle at the thought of more rigid regulations. They say less regulation leads to more vitality, but Landis said it also leads to a discombobulated patchwork of buildings.

“Yep, we’re going to make it harder to build a car wash next to a coffee shop,” he said.

Arambula said many developers prefer to know the rules of the game.

“You’re going to get pushback from developers you don’t want,” he said.

They say a master plan will ensure that the research corridor —from O Street to State Fair Park — ends up looking as good as Centennial Campus, a research campus at North Carolina State University. Oversized development parcels called “superblocks,” with lots of open space, and low, sprawling buildings create a campus feeling that’s a hallmark of a successful research corridors, they say.

To that end, the chamber of commerce, private 2015 Vision group, and the UNL Foundation donated about $70,000 to help pay Crandall Arambula. The consultants have analyzed more than 100 main streets and their theme is “revitalizing America’s cities.”

“We know what works,” Don Arambula said. “You can’t just say you’re creating research and development; you’ve got to create the environment.”

They take some credit for taking Racine — “a classic, rust-belt city” that had stagnated since the 1950s – and helping it come up with a downtown vision that they say has since attracted hundreds of millions in private investment.

They say design guidelines they helped draft for their hometown of Portland helped turn faceless, “hostile” blank walls facing streets into pedestrian friendly, engaging storefronts. A blank wall became a Tiffany’s store at the base of a parking lot, for example.

“We often say without the guidelines, we would not be the city we are today,” Crandall said.

The process of coming up with a vision for Lincoln began last summer, with meetings with “stakeholders” and property owners, Arambula said. They are now recommending the city adopt four pieces:

* A master plan, or general vision, for the R&D corridor that they say will encourage development.

* Zoning and design standards — from land use, to building heights to setbacks to parking — primarily in the R&D corridor to realize the vision in the master plan.

* Design standards for new construction downtown, all the way from the Haymarket District to the Antelope Valley Project. These standards would govern things like fencing, landscaping, building material and designs. The transparency of walls facing P and Q streets, for example, would be regulated.

* The proposal also suggests that the streetcar route envisioned in the city’s Downtown Master Plan be extended all the way to UNL’s East Campus.

It took Omaha three years to put the force of law into its citywide urban design standards last year, but the resulting blueprint has been hailed as one of the country’s most creative.

However, Shannon Harner is involved in developing one of the first Antelope Valley-related developments, and she said the new zoning regulations would make development more costly.

“Developers need flexibility, not rigidity,” she said. She’s involved in the Hoppe Partners’ development of an office/retail building and banquet hall that will take up most of the block bounded by L, K, 19th and 20th streets.

Arambula said as long as developers’ plans are consistent with the master plan, the permitting process will be streamlined.

Developer Rick Krueger has worked in Lincoln for 34 years and his rehabilitation of an O Street building has been called the first Antelope Valley redevelopment project. But he has similar concerns about the proposed zoning overlay and design guidelines.

“What we’re doing effectively is we’re changing zones,” he said. “If we want people to invest, why make it difficult?”

He also questions the city’s preference for things like flat roofs and masonry walls, through design standards.

“We all want to have nice looking properties downtown,” he said. “In a general sense, I am virtually always against allowing (city) staff subjective (to make) interpretations of my plans, and that’s what this does.”

And, he adds, “I don’t think I’m a wild-eyed radical.”

Reach Deena Winter at 473-2642 or dwinter@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Bev G wrote on March 3, 2008 1:02 am:
" Sure, advertising and making a quality city will cost more, but that too may explain the success of a company like GEICO. The small and limited space of the proposed Innovation Park, however, has flaws and other critical mass issues remain a weak acrchitecure for substantive growth ...one has mentioned: faux fur over wet cardboard rafters. The standards should have a broader scope across Lincoln’s developments. "

Phillip wrote on March 3, 2008 5:20 am:
" This study is just a perspective the city should consider. Alternatives exist. Like, focusing on real needs: development of a health campus with Bryan-LGH and UNMC . Maybe a centtral re location of the dental school. For development of health care excellence. Or, be “innovative” and integrate the law college into the downtown government center...or seek a different law-business university to be a midtown anchor. Building heights are arbitrary, Goodhue loved the skyscraper and it would honor him to have higher architecture saluting the capitol building. Create a high density profile south of his masterpiece and show “innovation” is more than constrained planning and holds diversity of populations in consideration. Integrate learning and systems we desire in a “professional” city as well as the service sector supporting it. Housing, retail, schools with a vertical connection.. "

Mike in DC wrote on March 3, 2008 6:56 am:
" There are many things an R&D corridor can bring, but the most important for R&D startups (if they want to move past gov't grants) is $ per sq ft. Yes, they want to be close to labor and collaboration, so the proximity is good, but if one is going to do the R&D corridor and UNL is going to re-dev State Fair Park -- you have to have a strategy for sq ft costs for those fledgeling firms with good ideas. Remember, to get further you'll need venture capitalists, and those types of people won't be happy with high sq ft $; and it's the #1 factor for people NOT recommending a particular incubator complex or any at all. You'll see both RTP and Centennial struggle as the $$$ rise in an exploding Raleigh-Durham area; they'll house either more-developed companies or those completely dependent on university/government funding. A step forward yes, but start thinking about the next step and over-arching strategy now. "

Outdo Portland wrote on March 3, 2008 7:07 am:
" Mr. Lzndis has grasped the idea of corporate parks. However, consider the logistics and space needed. An innovation corridor might best be located at the perimeter of the city. Or, spaced as moats around the core. Corporations and economy might benefit from better designed mass transit corridors. Excessive costs are added to products and services when parking lots take up acres of space and employees wages are inflated to pay for ever increasing fuel costs. Effective and efficient urban planning is increasingly important. So is creating a “city” environment that is based on increased population in a space that creates concentrated needs. Look at the space needs of Kawasaki or Novartis; they would look absurd side by side on 250+ acres where state fair park is. Keep parks, arena, theaters, hospitals, and museums close to dense and growing population zones.
The hallmark for success has changed since that 20 year old Centennial Campus began; Lincoln must be innovative and better designed with higher...green/common sense...standards. . "

mark wrote on March 3, 2008 7:14 am:
" Encouraging beyond words to see this actually happening for Lincoln. It's like we're ready to take huge steps forward. "

HP wrote on March 3, 2008 8:58 am:
" How many “cultural innovations” with dynamic economic success, began in garages with building standards and McInnovation Parks playing no role? "

Property Owner support wrote on March 3, 2008 9:32 am:
" I own property in the downtown area. I am glad to see the City is planning for future development. Property owners want to make sure whatever is developed is high quality construction. Quality development won't occur unless future property owners know that their investments won't be harmed by projects that decrease the value of their investments. Many new large surburban developments have restrictive covenants which require quality development. If you don't meet the restrictive covenant guidelines, you can't build. "

JR wrote on March 3, 2008 12:28 pm:
" So it's going to be okay to have coffee shops on every corner, just as long as there are no car washes...what's wrong with a car wash?!? Just like with any other business property, done correctly a car wash can be both visually appropriate and provide a very necessary service to the neighborhood. And isn't that what this whole development is about? Indicting a car wash as a type of business we don't want in a redevelopment project is like issuing a blanket statement saying we don't want a career politician in the city's Urban Development office. Ooops...guess it's too late on that one. Sorry SENATOR Landis! "

Rob wrote on March 3, 2008 12:57 pm:
" Shocked to see some reasonable comments! Good points. "

john wrote on March 3, 2008 9:28 pm:
" UNL and Dave Landis will tell us all will be how this area should be developed. Remember this is the resource corridor. Next the State Fair Park,, then your neighborhood. "

easy wrote on March 3, 2008 10:23 pm:
" it is lincoln very own "big dig" what a boondoggle "