Letters,2/18 : New laws for drunk drivers
We can’t make new laws whenever a tragedy happens in our society, but I do support this one. With drunken driving accidents estimated to kill someone every 32 minutes, and injure someone every 2 minutes, this is an obvious problem.
Making it mandatory for drivers who have been convicted of DUI to have an ignition interlock system in their car will not only keep them off the roads drunk but also keep us safe and help them with recovery if they have a drinking problem. If they are drunk, they won’t be going anywhere in their car, so if they are drunk all the time, they will have to find other means of transportation, which can become very inconvenient.
Some people may ask, “What about people who haven’t been convicted of DUI but still drive drunk?” If we are stopping people from driving drunk who already have one offense, that’s one drunk person off the road. It’s a lot better than having thousands of people who have DUIs still driving along with the thousands who don’t have DUIs.
I believe that if we make it mandatory for the accused to have this device installed in their car and pay for the installation, we will see a drop in the number of drunken driving accidents. No problem is solved right away.
Other people may think we should just resort to a public transportation system like in big cities such as New York. No way is Lincoln big enough to have any kind of public transportation system other than busing. Drunken driving is a problem that needs to be dealt with directly, not something we need to find a way around.
Nick Layton, Lincoln
Candidate not a true patriot
I would like to know how anyone could possibly cast a vote in favor of someone who is running for the office of the president of the United States, aka the commander in chief of the Armed Forces, who, on national television, refused to place his right hand over his heart during the playing of the National Anthem.
He also does not wear a flag pin, as do the other candidates.
Any true American patriot would not vote for him.
Roger Kopf, Nebraska City
Service comes with funding
Your Feb. 11 editorial addressing the need to review the snow-plowing process in Lincoln has some disturbing suggestions. You repeat the suggestion that Parks and Recreation equipment could be considered to clean some public streets. Every year, we hear the same comment that trails are cleared before some streets.
It is the responsibility of the city to make these commuter/recreation trails as safe as possible for children to get to school, disabled to get to local facilities, commuters to get to work, and certainly for people to get out and get some safe, healthy exercise. I cannot imagine asking the Parks Department to load up this equipment and use their already depleted budget to clean streets. Those of us who live on cul-de-sac-type streets do have some responsibility to make them usable. The Parks and Recreation Department’s budget has been reduced by the City Council for years, and the agency should not have to take on this responsibility.
The only way we can maintain the level of service we expect for our city streets is to support a city budget that would allow for that. The more heavily populated areas need to be cleared before the outlying areas.
Considering the number of snow and/or ice events we have had this year, I think Wayne Teten and his crew have done a good job. While we can make suggestions as to how this should be done, we need to understand the number of miles and equipment, which is the responsibility of the Public Works Department. They are the appropriate administrative department to make this decision.
Elaine Hammer, Lincoln
Good ideas for P.E. classes
The author did a wonderful job on the recent article, “P.E. classes evolve to meet needs.” Physical education teachers are starting to change their teaching to accommodate all children. Teachers are trying to make the classes more fun so students do not feel like they are exercising. It’s about time something was done about overweight children in America.
Music is now being listened to while exercising in gym class. This is a wonderful idea. Everybody likes music, and, when listening to music that you like, it can make time seem like it’s flying.
Plus, students receive stickers at the end of each day for sweating the most. Psychologists have found that being rewarded directly after a task shows better results.
P.E. teachers are starting to teach classes so the children are doing individual exercises instead of team sports. They are teaching them workout skills they can use when they are older.
This is exactly what America needs to counteract obesity in children.
Alysia Harvey, Murdock
Look at Housing First options
My brother lives in an apartment building just south of the Capitol. My brother is an ex-felon and an alcoholic. Sometimes (not recently) visitors to his apartment get rowdy, and the police are called.
My brother is just the kind of person “we” do not want in “our” city — not! My brother is exceptionally thoughtful and generous, willing to help a neighbor or a stranger with any task, someone who often gives the shirt off his back or his last bit of food to anyone in need.
Many cities in North America, including our neighbors Minneapolis and Denver, have realized that the only solution to homelessness is homes, and they have versions of “Housing First,” a program that attempts to stabilize people in trouble with society in homes of their own, where they have security and the kind of faith in the future that allows them to deal with problems of addiction, lack of skills and other issues that make them undesirable in the eyes of other people. My family is lucky in that we are able to help out our brother with a personal form of “housing first.”
I am disappointed that in all the stories and responses to your features on my brother’s neighborhood, no one has mentioned anything like “Housing First” or the importance of a home of one’s own for anyone trying to rehabilitate himself or herself. My brother’s carpet may be a little frowsy and his Formica a little chipped, but his home is crucial to his giving back to our community.
Instead of gentrifying his neighborhood, let’s make it the focus of our own “Housing First” program and make our city a better place for everyone to live — not just for those people who have never been plagued with dysfunctionality.
Frances W. Kaye, Lincoln
70th, O intersection dangers
70th and O is the most dangerous intersection.
Almost daily, I walk to either Hy-Vee, ShopKo, IGA or the Wells Fargo Bank.
When I cross the intersection of 70th and O on the south side going from east to west, I am facing the cars making right turns off of O onto 70th. I can see them easily. I always push the walk signal and start across when it says walk. I would say that maybe one of 30 cars making that right turn will yield to me as a pedestrian in the crosswalk.
When I am walking west to east and have the walk blinking, these cars force me to lose the walk signal, because I am forced to yield to them as they make their right turns.
I have gotten very good at dodging the negligent drivers but was not so lucky on Dec. 16. I was walking west to east but this time was hampered by the deep snow on the sidewalks. And the 3-foot snow bank to get onto the crosswalk was my downfall; I concentrated so hard on coming down safely that I failed to see the speeding car making the right turn.
This time I lived, but I have two cracked ribs and a broken right ankle from getting hit by that car.
I am scared to death of crossing that intersection again on either side after I have healed and can walk again.
Betty Christen, Lincoln

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit


Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Eric wrote on February 18, 2008 5:59 am:
whatever wrote on February 18, 2008 6:31 am:
Oh Roger wrote on February 18, 2008 6:58 am:
Hank wrote on February 18, 2008 7:06 am:
Edgar Pearlstein wrote on February 18, 2008 7:21 am:
David wrote on February 18, 2008 7:38 am:
Betty, this is a problem at every intersection. Many people don't remember that pedestrians have the right of way when they are given the walk symbol. Hopefully you have a speedy recovery. "
Cindy wrote on February 18, 2008 7:44 am:
bubba wrote on February 18, 2008 8:37 am:
Nick's statement "I believe that if we make it mandatory for the accused to have this device installed" is very troubling. I thought we were innocent until proven guilty. These devices will not stop people from driving while intoxicated. They only serve to increase the profits of the executives that own the companies where these devices are made. If you want to make a real impact, why not just call for the prohibition of alcohol all together? Oh, I know, because your Nascar races would cease to exist without the $$ sponsor money. "
Brice Sullivan wrote on February 18, 2008 8:50 am:
Sue F. wrote on February 18, 2008 8:52 am:
"I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag." Rep. Craig Washington (D)
"
Big Chief wrote on February 18, 2008 9:01 am:
ALW wrote on February 18, 2008 9:16 am:
Poll wrote on February 18, 2008 9:27 am:
I certainly don't put my hand on my heart during the National Anthem and served 10 years in the Army. "
truth wrote on February 18, 2008 9:30 am:
Tammy wrote on February 18, 2008 9:46 am:
whatever wrote on February 18, 2008 9:52 am:
Luke wrote on February 18, 2008 10:00 am:
Matt P. wrote on February 18, 2008 10:09 am:
MarkyMark wrote on February 18, 2008 10:21 am:
Nate wrote on February 18, 2008 10:24 am:
another mother wrote on February 18, 2008 10:46 am:
Sylvia wrote on February 18, 2008 10:57 am:
Now I just sing, "bug my phone, tap our calls, bug my phone, tap our calls, fourth amendment, fourth amendment, bug my phone, tap our calls." "
To Nate wrote on February 18, 2008 11:17 am:
Z4CH wrote on February 18, 2008 11:26 am:
People like Roger Kopf just don't understand how important our right to vote is if they judge a candidate on if they where a flag pin made in China or not. "
KP wrote on February 18, 2008 11:44 am:
that is really scary, and even some city's and state are
about as socialist as it gets!! I would think some one
wanting to lead this country would have in their heart and minds the importance showing their patriotism by
age old symbols of love and respect for our country!!
Then again, this could be an indication that the job
of leadership of the people is ONLY in THEIR OWN best
and financial INTEREST!!!!! If they are elected for
President, then that shows forgieners and immigrants that
they don't need to honor the U.S. We have gotten to the
point the Presidency is for the power, money, pension,
health insurance, security guards. Good grief, look
how lucky Hillary is, doing all this campaigning with
Security guards at her heals while the taxpayers are
paying for it. Ain't life grand when you can snooker
the people, while they try to figure out how to give the
middle class & poor $300.00 or $600.00 dollars. Whoopy!
Be sure you spend it at the gas pump so the oil companies
can make billions more!!! "
E Jr wrote on February 18, 2008 12:42 pm:
rac wrote on February 18, 2008 12:51 pm:
Alcohol related wrote on February 18, 2008 1:32 pm:
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) defines a fatal crash as “alcohol-related” or alcohol-involved if either a driver or a non-motorist (usually a pedestrian) had a measurable or estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.01 grams per deciliter (g/dl) or above. NHTSA defines a nonfatal crash as alcohol-related or alcohol-involved if police indicate on the police accident report that there is evidence of alcohol present. The code does not necessarily mean that a driver or nonoccupant was tested for alcohol.
In other words, if a driver or other involved person can be found or “estimated” to be at 1/8th of the level to be legally intoxicated (.08), or if an empty beer can is found at the scene, an accident is deemed to be an alcohol related crash, regardless of fault. Seems somewhat misleading, doesn’t it?
"
cw wrote on February 18, 2008 1:40 pm:
Tougher Drunk Driving Penalties wrote on February 18, 2008 3:58 pm:
What wrote on February 18, 2008 4:29 pm:
A true patriot will speak up against the government when that individual feels the government is wrong and not follow blindly like some want. "
Don wrote on February 18, 2008 9:13 pm:
Nate wrote on February 18, 2008 9:57 pm:
NE §60-6,124: '(2) No pedestrian shall start to cross the roadway in the direction of a DONT WALK indication...'
NE §60-6,152: '(1) A pedestrian shall obey the instructions of any traffic control device specifically applicable to pedestrians unless otherwise directed by a peace officer. (2) Pedestrians shall be subject to traffic and pedestrian-control signals as provided in the Nebraska Rules of the Road.'
NE §60-6,153: '(2) No pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for the driver to stop.' "
Here is a suggestion for Lincoln wrote on February 19, 2008 10:40 am:
I have a theory for Lincoln. wrote on February 19, 2008 10:51 am:
That Guy wrote on February 19, 2008 11:49 am:
If you are EVER caught with a BAC level above the legally allowable amount (.08, let's say), then you lose your license FOREVER. NO QUESTIONS ASKED!
If there is no excuse for ever driving drunk (which there isn't), then we should punish people in a similar fashion - they never get to drive again. And, it'd be good for the environment! "
drunk drivers R dumb wrote on February 19, 2008 3:07 pm: