Now
Mostly Cloudy and Breezy
35°
High
36°
Low
13°

Bill would provide safe haven for children of any age

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY JoANNE YOUNG / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 - 06:09:24 pm CST

State senators advanced a much simplified safe haven bill Thursday that would allow a parent to leave a child with a hospital employee without prosecution.

An amendment to the original bill (LB157), offered by Omaha Sen. Pete Pirsch, would require the hospital to promptly contact appropriate authorities to take custody of the child.

The more complicated version, introduced by Sen. Arnie Stuthman of Platte Center, stalled two weeks ago because senators were concerned how a person would determine if an infant was younger than 72 hours old or 30 days old, as had been required.

Related Link(s):

Other senators had been concerned about how the father’s rights would be protected — or even a mother who changed her mind — if parental rights were automatically terminated within a short period of time, either 48 hours or 30 days.

Pirsch said the simplified bill was a collaborative effort among many senators who wanted to see the bill pass this year.

The compromise amendment would put the decision on terminating parental rights in the hands of juvenile courts, where it belongs, Pirsch said.

Omaha Sen. Gwen Howard said Nebraska Department of Health and Human Service officials had a concern about whether the bill, without an age limitation, would open the door for a parent leaving an older child, say a teenager, at a hospital.

“The main concern is for the safety of the child,” Stuthman said.

Omaha Sen. Ernie Chambers, who has opposed the bill all along, and even filibustered it, said he “made a deal with the devil” on the compromise to “more or less get out of the way” of its passage.

“I don’t like society putting its stamp of approval on women abandoning their babies,” he said.

This society, he said during debate, is not respectful toward women in general. It is not nurturing, and casts terrible insulting slurs against them.

The bill does not deal with the underlying causes of child abandonment, he said.

“What is it in a society that will make a young woman feel so desperate that she can not hold on to what may be the most important thing in her life?” he said. “Those she should be able to turn to for sustenance and nurturing may be the ones who come down on her the hardest.”

Young women should be made to know that a baby is for life, he said. Society has the obligation to address these issues in such as way that she does not think automatically that the way out of a difficult situation is to throw her hands up and abandon her child, he said.

Those who say they are opposed to abortion have never done anything to address the underlying causes, he said.

Sen. Annette Dubas of Fullerton said she appreciated some of what Chambers said. She said she would take the bill as a personal challenge, and issue that challenge to her constituents and the state.

“This is about what we as a society offer as support,” she said, and what is offered to the child in terms of health care, quality education and jobs for his or her parents.

If the bill passes on final reading, Nebraska would be the 49th state with such a law, unless Alaska beats the state to it.

Alaska has passed a safe surrender bill that is awaiting its governor’s signature. Alaska’s bill would allow a parent to surrender a child up to 21 days old at hospitals, fire stations, police stations or to a doctor.

Nebraska’s bill became more urgent last year when three women abandoned their babies.

Last summer, a 21-year-old woman was charged in Lincoln with misdemeanor neglect of a child for leaving her newborn daughter, about 11 hours old, at Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center.

Omaha saw two cases of child abandonment, one at a hospital and one near a trash bin in an apartment complex.

Reach JoAnne Young at 473-7228 or jyoung@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Setting it up for failure wrote on January 31, 2008 12:19 pm:
" It appears all the senators are doing is setting this bill up for failure, why can't they just model it after other states that have successfully passed the bill and be done with it, instead of making it so broad that it will have multiple holes shot in it when it comes to the floor for debate.... "

Concerned wrote on January 31, 2008 1:19 pm:
" One thing I see becoming a problem is someone dropping off a kid one day and the next day they want them back. I don't find that fair to the children to be given away possibly numerous times. - But do support fully a mom walking into a hospital to give up her newborn so it can have a good healthy life "

Anne wrote on January 31, 2008 1:40 pm:
" Because that's what Legilators do...obscure the obvious. Not all the time...but enough to be frustrating! Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh! "

Dano wrote on January 31, 2008 3:14 pm:
" Why does it always have to be mothers? I thinks kids of any age should be covered by this bill and agreee with that, but who is paying for their care? What will the stipulations be for a mother or father to get their child back should they be able to make their situation work out? Most people that would fall into this situation may not be able to afford legal expenses if the process is too complex and it shouldn't burden an already busy legal system. I am all for this bill, but make sure it is done right before rushing a decision on it. If it requires the long session, shelve it until then so that it is done the right way for the good of those who need it. "

Good Idea wrote on January 31, 2008 4:25 pm:
" I like the idea of expanding the bill to older children. So many parents, especially single moms, are unable to handle their children, especially teenagers. I think it is a great idea that they have the extra weapon of simply saying, "I'm about to give up and hand you over to the state." Also, the idea that the parents need to go through a stiff process to get the kids back is a good idea, also. "

Clarence wrote on January 31, 2008 4:44 pm:
" It is time that Nebraska comes out of the Dark Ages and gets some type of safe haven bill passed. Now they are the only state (dead last) without a safe haven bill. "

Wow wrote on January 31, 2008 5:32 pm:
" I can visualize some angst-ridden preteen walking into the hospital and claiming her parents abandoned her there. This scenario is hilarious in theory but probably just a royal pain in real life. This bill needs more work, people. "

Amy wrote on January 31, 2008 9:52 pm:
" I am glad to see this bill come into play. Sen. Chambers is correct, it is a sad situation for many women today who feel no other option but to leave their child behind. The state is saving lives with this bill. It is something most of us can't imagine. I am not in a desperate situation and my parents modeled good parenting. I have resources to support my two children and a husband who is actively involved and gainfully employed. I did experience post partum "blues". Because of the support circle I had I was able to rely on others assistance and recover without incident. What if you a young women with depression and a little baby or young child feared going to jail and couldn't handle the overwhelming emotions. Sounds like a recipe for disaster. Now,she can turn the child over to a hospital and not fear going to jail. Good for baby, good for mom. Don't judge someone, It's easy to say what "I'd never do" when God has blessed me with so much. "

Marsha wrote on January 31, 2008 10:21 pm:
" I'm ready to dump off a couple of teenagers as soon as this goes into effect. "

Dump Them Off wrote on February 1, 2008 11:11 am:
" Great, so if being a parent is cramping your lifestyle, because it's hard to get any "mens" with kids around, you can just dump your teens off and it's all legal. What an bizarre idea. "

sdw wrote on February 1, 2008 4:31 pm:
" I'm so happy Nebraska will join the rest of the US in understanding that children need this addtional step to protect them when family they are born to can't. I just wish they would place a 90 day time limit on the ability of the parents to reclaim them. This way the children have a better chance of being adopted out sooner so they can stay in a stable family enviroment. Not live on and off in state foster homes or children homes like Cedars and Boy's Town. "

Michelle wrote on February 4, 2008 8:26 pm:
" its a great idea because if a parent doesn't want their child, can't handle them, or can't provide a stable healthy environment for them then why would we leave those children in those kind of homes? Yes the parents shouldnt have had them but they did, so we should have some way of protecting those children! We need to stop thinking about what the parents shouldn't do and realize that they are gonna do what they want. It doesn't matter what bills are or aren't passed so lets deal with the outcome of the children and have a safe alternative. "