Groups oppose planned LES rate hike
BY ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star
Two groups — representing big and small businesses — are opposing Lincoln Electric System’s proposed 5.5 percent rate hike.
The Lincoln Employers Coalition and the Lincoln Independent Business Association want the city-owned utility to reduce the hike by 1 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively.
“We support a strong LES with reasonable increases,” coalition chairman Bob Caldwell said. “We are supporting about 90 percent of what they want in this increase.”
What? The Lincoln Electric System wants to boost its rates by 5.5 percent, which would raise about $11 million annually.
When? Effective March 1.
What would a typical resident pay? An additional $3.50 per month.
Why? LES says it needs to pay for new power generation and transmission facilities, replenish its rate stabilization fund, pay for increased costs to haul coal by rail, and develop a sustainable energy program.
Who opposes it? Lincoln Employees Coalition wants a 4.5 percent increase; Lincoln Independent Business Association supports a 4 percent rate hike.
Who likes it? The Wachiska Audubon chapter supports the utility’s proposed sustainable energy program, which would be funded from the rate increase.
What’s next: The City Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed rate increase Monday.
Caldwell said the coalition is made up of about 22 of Lincoln’s largest employers, including Linweld, Goodyear and Nebco.
About two years ago, the group successfully challenged a proposed energy surcharge, he said, and has since worked with LES to keep the utility “strong” and power costs low.
The LES Administrative Board has approved the 5.5 percent increase but the City Council must give the final OK.
Both business groups say they plan to testify at the council’s 1:30 p.m. public hearing Monday.
LES says it needs the increase to cover increased power generation, transmission and coal transportation costs; replenish its rate stabilization fund; and finance a new sustainable energy program.
In a prepared statement, the utility said discussion of a rate increase was included in its budget 2008 preparations last year. Details were distributed to customers in their December bills and presented at a public hearing on Jan. 8.
The coalition, which is pushing for a 4.5 percent increase, said LES could reduce its rate increase by dropping plans for its sustainable energy program. LES plan to use 0.5 percent of the increase to generate $1 million to fund the program.
The coalition does support a voluntary checkoff allowing customers to donate a half-percent to the program, Caldwell said.
It also believes LES spends too much on administration, advertising and litigation. Caldwell said some of that money, along with money from capital improvement projects, could go into the rate stabilization fund, which has a balance of $2.4 million.
The Wachiska Audubon chapter supports the sustainable energy program and is asking membership to contact the council or testify at the public hearing.
“Saving energy is a good thing in itself. Making things that use electricity more efficient is also the cheapest and fastest way to curb pollution from global warming or climate change,” Arlys Reitan told chapter members in an e-mail.
LIBA executive director Coby Mach said his group also advocates a voluntary checkoff to fund the sustainable energy program.
Said Mach: “LES is telling us that this is important to people in our community. If it is that important, we feel that people will voluntarily contribute to it.”
LIBA wants LES to adopt a 4 percent rate hike, suggesting the utility take about $4.5 million earmarked for a future methane gas extraction facility and put those dollars into the rate stabilization fund.
Said Mach: “If you feel the rate stabilization fund is that imperative, move some dollars around rather than taxing the citizens of Lincoln for your savings account.”
Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at 402-473-7243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.

Facebook
del.icio.us
Fark It
Reddit




Post Your Comment
Standards and RulesYour posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
Umm wrote on January 30, 2008 12:09 pm:
always done, they just raise the rates anyway. I pay as
much for the city owned LES as I did for a stockholder
owned company when I lived in another state. Apparently,
instead of the money going to pay stockholders, here in
Lincoln it goes to pay bigger salaries. It sure is going
somewhere!!!! So quit bragging about Nebraska's "cheap"
power!!! "
downtown dweller wrote on January 30, 2008 12:18 pm:
BR wrote on January 30, 2008 1:11 pm:
rates are cheaper because LES is city owned. Yet compare
it with a stockholder owned company, yeah you might pay
$200.00 more a yr for electric but property taxes where
I lived were $3,500.00 LESS! Little wonder why businesses
don't want to come here, you don't snow them!!!! "
advertising wrote on January 30, 2008 1:13 pm:
Of course... wrote on January 30, 2008 3:10 pm:
competition... wrote on January 30, 2008 3:17 pm:
russell wrote on January 30, 2008 3:28 pm:
A successful sustainable energy program might reduce Lincoln's need for coal and high priced natural gas (which is used for summer load peaks). Less natural gas used for electricity translates into more gas for home heating. "
James wrote on January 30, 2008 3:37 pm:
oh board members wrote on January 30, 2008 3:43 pm:
Kevin wrote on January 30, 2008 4:07 pm:
But I could be wrong. "
Vote No wrote on January 30, 2008 4:43 pm:
Mr. Big says wrote on January 30, 2008 4:55 pm:
The FACTS wrote on January 30, 2008 5:15 pm:
whatever wrote on January 31, 2008 5:18 am:
Progressive Rate wrote on January 31, 2008 7:18 am:
Wasteful use of electricity should be more expensive to help encourage wasteful users to modify their behavior. "
Ed wrote on January 31, 2008 7:50 am:
Kind of Ironic wrote on January 31, 2008 8:24 am:
BYOB wrote on January 31, 2008 8:44 am:
All utilities to include cable and cab service are allowed to be a monopoly by our city council, what did you expect in Lincoln, Nebraska the Good ole Boy state? "
WCG wrote on January 31, 2008 8:48 am:
Been to school! wrote on January 31, 2008 9:08 am:
will be as much as I was paying to Duke Energy in another
state, a stockholder company!. FACT: Non-profit, lowest
rates in country - not according to my bills. FACT: If
you think your saving soooo much in your city owned electric company, have you checked your property tax bills
lately??? In my Duke Energy electric state my property
taxes were $615.00 for a larger house big yard (and freedom) versus $4,100.00 here in Lincoln for a smaller house and NO yard. Wheeeee, aint it alot cheaper to live
in Lincoln???????? Some people just don't know when and
how the city robs ya blind!!!!!!! "
IN A RECESSION wrote on January 31, 2008 9:45 am:
Shadow wrote on January 31, 2008 9:59 am:
Hey 5th Grader wrote on January 31, 2008 11:45 am:
Lastly, what does the electric utility have to do with property taxes? Answer, nothing. So, Been to School, look in the camera and say..... "
ej wrote on January 31, 2008 12:01 pm:
I don't like rate hikes either, but geez, think you're complaining now? What are you going to do when you don't have the power to run your computer so you can come on here complain about it. "
Please research wrote on January 31, 2008 2:45 pm:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelelectric.html "
jenn wrote on January 31, 2008 2:46 pm:
Truth wrote on January 31, 2008 3:23 pm:
Another wrote on January 31, 2008 9:06 pm:
wages wrote on January 31, 2008 9:54 pm:
Marilyn McNabb wrote on January 31, 2008 10:02 pm: