Now
Mostly Cloudy and Breezy
35°
High
36°
Low
13°

Fair board gathering itself for legislative tug of war

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ART HOVEY / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, Jan 26, 2008 - 12:48:55 am CST

KEARNEY — Soon enough, the Nebraska State Fair Board will be back on treacherous turf.

They will be confronting state lawmakers, university officials, Lincoln business leaders and others who want them out of State Fair Park so that its 251 acres can be occupied by the university and potential private-sector partners in a technology park.

But at least through Sunday, fair board members will be among friends. Hundreds of members of county fair boards were arriving in Kearney Friday for the start of the Nebraska Association of Fair Managers Convention.

Story Photo
The Nebraska State Fair Board will be confronting state lawmakers, university officials, Lincoln business leaders and others who want them out of State Fair Park so that its 251 acres can be occupied by the university and potential private-sector partners in a technology park. (LJS File)

A year ago, said Ken Killion, county fair officials voted 50-0 to back their state fair counterparts to do whatever they thought needed doing to make the state event a success.

Look for more of the same sort of open-ended support this year, said Killion, Marquette resident and executive secretary to the county fair group.

“We’re not going to try to micro-manage the state fair board from here,” he said.

The message from Jerry Fitzgerald to those who want to move the fair wasn’t quite as warm and fuzzy as he got ready to preside at a state fair board meeting in Kearney that was largely devoted to positions on legislative bills.

“This board is not going to bond itself for $30 million to go to a place we don’t want to go,” said State Fair Board Chairman Fitzgerald, of Gering. “We are not going to do that.”

The $30 million figure is what advocates of moving the fair want its board to contribute to a $60 million package that is often mentioned as part of a deal to move the state fair several miles to the east next to the Lancaster Event Center.

Apart from that package, Grand Island and North Platte leaders also have expressed interest in hosting the fair.

A sense of direction could  emerge from the 2008 legislative session, where Lincoln Sen. Ron Raikes already has proposed turning the fairgrounds over to the university.

The fair board voted unanimously Friday to oppose Raikes’ bill, which is supported by every lawmaker from the Lincoln area.

The board decided to back two other fair-related bills:

n One offered by Bayard Sen. Phil Erdman, chairman of the Agriculture Committee, would require the university to pay at least $30 million for State Fair Park.

n The other, offered by the full committee, would delete from state law the requirement that Lincoln be the fair’s host city.

The bills are expected to be scheduled for hearings before the Agriculture Committee on Feb. 28, the last potential hearing date of the session.

A third ag committee proposal  would change the makeup of the fair board and specifically remove a requirement that the University of Nebraska-Lincoln chancellor be one of its members. The current chancellor, Harvey Perlman, strongly supports UNL’s push to take over the fairgrounds. Perlman did not attend Friday’s meeting of the fair board.

The board decided to stay neutral on the board membership bill, but members had much stronger feelings about Raikes’ intentions.

In recommending opposition, board member Sallie Atkins of Halsey noted that Raikes did not include any financial compensation in the details of LB1044.

Atkins and other members, including Van Neidig of Battle Creek, also took issue with Raikes’ proposal to create a six-member commission to decide where to put the fair.

Atkins called it “a little scary” that six people “will determine the future of a complex entity that they’re really not familiar with.”

In another vote, fair board members said they should be allowed to determine a suitable alternate site if and when they are handed adequate funds for moving the fair.

Neidig, one of the board’s most outspoken members, said prior to the meeting that Raikes has “knowingly ignored the interests and sentiments of the people of this state — or he wouldn’t have delivered a bill like that.”

Neidig characterized the actions of Raikes and others from the Lincoln area maneuvering to move the fair as “selfish, arrogant and acting in an extremely obnoxious, unbusiness-like manner.

“This is the State Fair,” he said. “This is not a Lincoln real estate transaction.”

In a telephone interview later Friday, Raikes said he certainly intended for the views of the fair board to be “considered carefully” regarding a location. He expects that “if we’re going to spend money to move the fair, whatever bills are accrued will have to be paid.”

Beyond that, “it’s certainly not my intent to unnecessarily offend or treat anyone arrogantly,” he said. “On the other hand, there are aspects of my job that are tough.”

That includes “making the calls that I think are the right calls decisively.”

The focus of attention in Kearney will shift Saturday toward the agenda of county fair officials and to election of two of the seven members of the state fair board who are elected by district.

Joe Andrews, a five-year veteran of the board from Bassett, said he will seek re-election to a three-year term. Board member Steve Rogers of Gibbon must step down because of term limits.

Candidates to replace him and to compete with Andrews are unlikely to be known until they step forward at district meetings.

Rogers, who has served on different versions of the state fair board since 1989, leaves with mixed feelings.

“The fair has been in Lincoln for 106 years,” he said. “Nobody in the state of Nebraska knows of it in any other location.”

Reach Art Hovey at 473-7223 or at ahovey@journalstar.com


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
UNL STUDENT wrote on January 26, 2008 1:52 am:
" We will know in a few months that it is going to be somewhere else. And the future leaders of this state will have a great research facility just north of Harper Schram smith. GO get'um Harvey "

Ike Mason wrote on January 26, 2008 7:29 am:
" There is a much simpler solution. Move the research complex to UNK. "

Please wrote on January 26, 2008 8:40 am:
" Please leave the fair where it is. That is the tradition. You seen what happened to the football team when we got someone new and changed everything. Well now we are going back to the old way of doing things. I think if you moved the fair it will end totally in the next few years. Thats just my opinion. "

country boy wrote on January 26, 2008 8:51 am:
" Stick to your guns, State Fair Board, Exec Director and advocates. This is tantamount to a hostile takeover, like what you would see in the movie Wall Street. Bullying tactics by UNL officials, idle threats by a term-limited state senator, whose previous claim to fame was the total destruction of the Class I school system, should not be tolerated by any of us. The fair is sitting on a gold mine in terms of the value of property and location. We need to give Director Cosner a worthwhile opportunity to turn the fair attendance around. I'm conviced he will do this as his past record of achievment speaks for itself. If UNL so desperately wants to build a research campus then do so at their own expense and risk. I thought the plan was to tier in with the Beadle center and develop in that immediate area. The taxpayers and residents of this state are tired of having these innovative ideas crammed down our throats. Director Cosner will turn this venue around and you will all be proud of our State Fair. Just give him the time. "

Over-Taxed wrote on January 26, 2008 8:57 am:
" I wish the Legislature would take away the tax authority from these county fair boards. County fairs are archaic in these days of so many entertainment options. I can't afford to pay taxes to these odd taxing entities. "

COIN wrote on January 26, 2008 10:34 am:
" Many of us realize that the most critical state issues desperately need collaboration and innovation in equal measure, however lf the Vision 2015 agenda is coercive and falsely exploits real collaborative innovation it will not help lift us above the level of simply defending selfish interests.
The State Fair is a legitimate agency to build business for the state; it is sad the Lincoln senators haven’t addressed the positive role of the fair and collateral benefits it provides Lincoln businesses.
We’ve not seen reciprocity and transparency that would give opponents to the state fair the trust and credibility that state interests are enhanced mot just moved. Until Raikes and others demonstrate ethical, and not just sly legal manipulation and deceptive motives behind his legislation, the state as a whole is mocked. We want better for the state but also want the state fair to have backbone in moving forward.. "

Bessey wrote on January 26, 2008 10:59 am:
" Families can participate in fair activities. It is not really a state fair if it lowers itself to a county fair level. A real world class innovation park would be virtual and be built in cyber space,. It would not occupy hundreds of acres. State property t should not be squandered to a university who is making a proposal that is obsolete from its inception... nearly 20 years old...that is 5 generations ago in the information systems and technology culture. In a world wherein knowledge doubles every three to five years, Information is ubiquitous and changes rapidly, a virtual innovation park is a competitive aspiration NU should instead pursue and the legislature might instead explore with Lincoln and it’s vision. That is obsolete before ground is even broken. "

Larry wrote on January 26, 2008 11:17 am:
" The Senators from Lincoln are going to go in lock step with the Lincoln "business leaders." That's if they want any support getting re-elected. Sad, but true! It's all about money with today's politicians. "

Mark wrote on January 26, 2008 11:56 am:
" Talk, talk, talk. One special interest group wants this while another one wants that. What I want to know is what do the people want to do with the State fair? After all, it isn't yours, it's OURS. "

sam wrote on January 26, 2008 11:57 am:
" you have a few lincoln business men who do not make enough money with the fair being there, they want the University to bring in business to that area and build buildings and bring money for them. If the university gets the fair groungs between the business men of 2015 and the university they should put all the cost of the fair ground up and make it one of the best in the nation. Not just a fill in the university said they made over a million with one building they want 17 so that means they do not need more money for the university - they have yet to say what they did with the money they made but it has made the state or lincoln grow in professional jobs. Let them do this by the new area they are going to build with out the voters okey. "

Tim wrote on January 26, 2008 4:13 pm:
" Lincoln and UNL don't have the money to properly keep up the buildings they have. Who the hell are they to ask for more?????The people donating money for the move need to disclose their conflicts-of-interest, et al. "

Jeff wrote on January 26, 2008 7:02 pm:
" You should try going to a few. They are thriving and growing, and serving the purpose to which they were intended. 4-H, FFA, etc. Rural youth benefit greatly. And the rural folks really enjoy them. It is the roots that the state fair needs to build on. "

Ej wrote on January 26, 2008 9:22 pm:
" harvey has got a personal agenda the state doesn't have a choice! "

Common wrote on January 26, 2008 9:38 pm:
" With a recession on the way, it is unreasonable to pour state dollars to move the fair. Better to use the taxpayer dollars for property tax rebates. Maybe more people will buy fair tickets with that money.
For the time being, leave behind the "research park". Research can happen in your corridors and company spinoffs can happen in vacant property downtown. "

Bla...Bla...Bla.... wrote on January 27, 2008 8:26 am:
" Anyone with ANY sense KNOWS that the fair moving is a DONE DEAL. The "Big Red Machine" wants it and so it's done. Enough Said!!!! "

Phil wrote on January 27, 2008 9:46 am:
" Neidig, hit the nail right on the heaed when he talks about Raikes “knowingly ignored the interests and sentiments of the people of this state — or he wouldn’t have delivered a bill like that.” This is not the first time that this has happened though. Let me remind everyone that he was the other and lead comspirator to tear apart a perfectly good education system in the state of Nebraska. Then after the people of this state told him and the other senators that they did not agree they just ignored us all. So I hope for the sake of the the State Fair that this does not pass. Once Raikes starts something though he does not stop until he gets his way. Thank goodness he is almost gone!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"

Chris wrote on January 27, 2008 1:48 pm:
" The fair is sagging badly, needs huge amounts of capital for infrastructure improvements, and has to come begging for new streams of revenue practically every year. Meanwhile it sits on the most valuable chunk of real estate in the City of Lincoln. UN-L is going to build its own research buildings in the Beadle/Antelope Valley area. This is going to be for future UN-L needs and private research firms that wish to locate near the University, to take advantage of the knowledge base already in place. This would add high paying jobs to the Lincoln/Nebraska economy. In addition, the University and business leaders are willing to foot part of the bill to move the fair to a new location, but the stubborn fair board is dragging their feet, not realizing their ticket is already punched. And the fact that most commenting here are in support of a fair on life support indicates some people need a lesson in economic base theory. Move the research center to UN-K Ike? Why? First what would UN-K offer to private research firms that is over and above what UN-L is offering? Second, why would Lincoln want to forgo high paying jobs? Is our local economy in such good shape that we don't need to add jobs to it?

I agree with UNL STUDENT: "GO get'um Harvey" "

Keep Fair where it is wrote on January 27, 2008 6:04 pm:
" I believe that the majority of Nebraskans want to keep the Fair at its current location. It is interesting that the Legislature hired a consultant to evaluate the Fair and make recommendations. The consultants said it will take $175 million to move the Fair and only $30 million to improve it where it is. The answer here is obvious, keep the Fair where it is. How can these so called leaders even suggest that the better answer is to move the Fair? And Raikes proposal to give the Fairgrounds away is absolutely crazy. I thought our senators were suppose to look out for all of us, not just the "big shots" of Lincoln. And the numbers of $30-$60 million for the Fairgrounds is not even near the correct value of the Fair. The people of Nebraska already voted to provide lottery money to the Fair and keep it where it is. Also, no other state in recent years has moved their Fairgrounds. Look at what is already at the Fairgrounds. The infrastructure is there. The history and tradition is there. Why do the so called leaders want to treat Nebraskans like a bunch of New Yorkers. We as true Nebraskans have tradition and heritage in our blood. We cherish historic buildings. How can this part of the Fair be moved? Are they going to move the 4-H Building and the Industrial Arts Building? How about Heritage Village at the Fair? How about the Open Air Auditorium? There are parts of the Fair that can not be moved. The economic and historical solution is the keep the Fair where it is. It is also interesting to note, that all of the public who testified at the hearing before the Agricultural Committee in December, who were not representing some organization, supported keeping the Fair where it is. It it interesting that these comments were not put in the press. I wonder why. The true Nebraskans need to take a stand and urge our Senators to keep the Fair where it is. Let's not let Perlman win on this one. "

Joe wrote on January 28, 2008 12:00 am:
" It appears the fair is about to get "Soliched." Frank assembled a quality group of coaches and was about to turn the football program around---and what happened? The powers that be got rid of him before he had a chance. Obviously, he was on the right track as virtually the same coaches are on board right now and we expect the program to recover. Now the State Fair, with the lottery funds approved by a majority of the "Nebraska" voters has begun to take the necessary actions to turn the fair around. However, the powers that be are ready to "kick them out". In other words, the fair is about to get "Soliched". Is there a lesson to be learned here? Memo to the powers that be: Absolute power corrupts! "