Now
Partly Cloudy and Breezy
36°
High
36°
Low
13°

Pay heed to risks of all-terrain vehicles

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Wednesday, Jan 23, 2008 - 12:26:40 am CST

Toward the end of a Journal Star story on workplace safety last week, an expert pointed out that all-terrain vehicles are involved in a significant number of farming-related fatalities in Nebraska.

Six people were killed last year, and the previous year, in rural accidents involving the popular off-road vehicles.

Similar references to ATVs show up in other stories involving accident statistics. Officials pointed out last year that motor vehicle crashes are the third leading cause of death for children in Nebraska. One out of every eight of the children killed in vehicle crashes in 2005 was involved in an ATV accident.

The risk of death and injury while operating an ATV deserves to be emblazoned on the public consciousness.

The safety of the vehicles receives only minimal government oversight.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission is so dysfunctional — critics attribute its performance to the Bush administration’s antipathy to regulation — that it has been unable to enforce recall of the Chinese-made Kazuma Meerkat 50 Youth All-Terrain Vehicle.

The ATV, supposedly designed for use by children ages 6 to 11, can be started while in gear, lacks front brakes and has no parking brake. While lack of a chairman has prevented a mandatory recall, the commission did issue a warning that “children are at risk of injury or death due to multiple safety defects with this off-road vehicle.”

Few rules regulate use of the estimated 7.6 million ATVs in use in the United States. Children can legally operate them in many states, including Nebraska.

The balloon-tired vehicles apparently inspire overconfidence in their stability and safety. But the machines flip over with deadly frequency.

Nearly 8,000 people have been killed and 2 million seriously hurt on ATVs.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons have called for laws to prohibit the use of ATVs by children younger than 16.

“Children under the age of 12 generally possess neither the body size and strength, nor the motor skills and coordination necessary for the safe handling of an ATV,” the surgeons’ group said. “Children under the age of 16 generally have not yet developed the perceptual abilities or the judgment required for the safe use of highly powered vehicles.”

In today’s politically correct world, some consumers may be suffering from a false sense of security on the belief that government officials in the so-called “nanny state” are looking out for their safety.

That’s certainly not true when it comes to ATVs.

Safe operation depends almost entirely on the good judgment of owners and operators. Be advised, and spread the word.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Safe Operation wrote on January 23, 2008 8:52 am:
" LJS, you said it all with the last sentence. After all, people make choices and there are plenty of things out there that people can die from. Personally, I've operated an ATV since I was 10 (I'm now 27) to move cattle, irrigate, fence, and other farm and hunting related activities (and by the way, I'm a female). I've also ridden with friends (as adults) into creeks and off road. I've seen how careless people can be and the harm it can cause. But for those people who bought the ATV for work/practical purposes will tell you that the machine was not cheap (around $5000 or more) and they take good care of them. Responsibility is taught and cannot be regulated. Same thing with motorcycle helmets. People make choices and then have to live with them. The gov't can't make people make good decisions....that is obvious enough! "

W.G.Ahlers wrote on January 24, 2008 11:25 am:
" You know, at $5000, that seems almost like a bargain compared to a lot of agriculture equipment, doncha' think? "

mark wrote on January 24, 2008 6:04 pm:
" I agree with the last gal's opinion, I started riding on my honda 110 atc at the age of 9, and all it takes to operate a three wheeler or four wheeler is a brain and common sense. Now I am a collector of three wheelers and people sometimes say to me why you have those dangerous three wheelers. Peole can get killed on any machines when you don't use common sense. I tell them it a process of elimination, it gives God a chance to weed out the stupid and ignorant. I have never had problems using these machines around the farm, it alot cheaper than driving around in a 40,000 dollar truck just to check on livestock. Especially with 3+ dollar fuel costs it getting harder and harder for the american farmer to make a profit with a purchase of high dollar equiptment. Also with people with the helmet laws wanting lifted, it wont happen unless the seat belt law is lifted and that wont happen either anytime soon, so deal with it. It's all BS and just dont let the dumb ones operate machiery. "

YEP wrote on January 29, 2008 8:18 am:
" Don't run with scissors, don't jump from a tree, don't drive off an embankment, etc., etc. Who bought the 4 wheelers for the children? Who allowed them to drive? Where? What about bicycles and concrete streets and sidewalks? Every death is a tradgedy because it could have been avoided but miscalculations and misjudgement are not the private domain of children under 16. Pardon me while I run down town and get a six pack for the road. Space in the paper could be better invested to promote more sever punishment and proper prosecution of DUI offenders. The only new and valid information in teh article involved the poor safety features of the China built junk. "