Now
Fair
45°
High
74°
Low
50°

Letters, 1/14: Kudos to Culler community

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Monday, Jan 14, 2008 - 12:26:16 am CST

I applaud the Culler parents, students and staff who are standing up for their school in the face of unfair sanctions under the No Child Left Behind federal mandates.  They deserve more, however, than the positive recognition given them in the Lincoln Journal Star news story (Dec. 31) and recent editorial. They deserve hearing the media tell the simple truth, loud and clear.

Let’s review:

First, Culler was deemed “inadequate” in the area of special education, as were many other schools. By definition, special education students cannot be expected to be proficient on standardized tests.  They have individual programs designed for them and their special needs.

It is a basic, obvious flaw in the NCLB system that is at fault here, not Culler or the special education students or their teachers. (The same logic-defying NCLB principle expects students defined as English-language-learners to be proficient in English.)

Second, Culler was subject to sanctions, and got undeserved bad press, only because it is a Title I school, in other words because many of its students are poor.  This equals hitting someone twice when they are already down.

I believe Marilyn Moore, Lincoln Public Schools associate superintendent for instruction, tried to indicate this in the initial news article about the NCLB results, but her very diplomatic points were placed far into the story.

Perhaps LPS officials have to be circumspect, but the Lincoln Journal Star should speak out boldly about the root problem: a punitive, poorly conceived Bush administration education policy put upon a society where that same administration has helped the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

I taught in LPS many years, and my kids went to Hartley, Culler, Lefler and Lincoln High.   They had excellent, dedicated teachers and they have clearly benefited from the multi-lingual, multi-cultural environment they experienced. They are doing well, and I am grateful. It is a valuable asset that Lincoln has a strong citywide public school system. 

Jane Reinkordt, Denton

Think again about helmets

In response to those who believe that motorcycle helmets should be optional, think about this. What happens if you are in an accident?

I am a fellow motorcyclist and work for the Lincoln Fire Department. I have seen firsthand what happens to those without helmets. Some die and some live to spend the rest of their lives in a nursing facility, eventually running out of money and relying on Medicare or Medicaid. Now, everyone pays for your “choice.” Riding safely means that you can live to ride another day.

For those that believe that they should have a choice, maybe you don’t need a helmet. You sound like you don’t have much to protect.

Sten Ulrich, CreteKeep commissioners honest

When you see an increase in your phone, electric or gas bill, look to our Public Service commissioners — Gerald Vap, Anne Boyle, Rod Johnson, Frank Landis and Tim Schram. The commissioner’s salary is $75,000 a year.

To help the public, we need LB61 presented to the Legislature and passed. It would prohibit certain gifts and contributions to candidates for or members of the PSC.

At the present time, our commissioners are wined, dined and given money for their campaigns by the utility companies that they are to regulate for us.

I would feel better if the commissioners aren’t taking favors from the utility companies that they are supposed to be watchdogs over.

Bernice Fahlberg, Lincoln

‘Ground Zero’ name troubling

I agree with the lady from Washington, D.C. (letter, Dec. 30) that “Ground Zero” should not be the title of your entertainment section.

She referenced Sept. 11, 2001; however, I can go back to World War II to get a chilling effect.

In fact, when I get that section of the paper, I immediately throw it away. I don’t even like to touch it.

Jean Page, Lincoln

Hy-Vee ignoring customers

“A helpful smile in every aisle” — isn’t that how the Hy-Vee jingle goes?

Not on your life, at least not at the 48th and Leighton location! About to lose their only close grocery store and a ban on another one taking that location for several years — anybody smiling yet?

This neighborhood is high-density older population, plus several apartments that are about to be a victim of “Big Business” and their unrelenting monopoly that cares not one red cent about service, but always have their hand out for tax dollars from customers who have supported them for years. Shame on you, Hy-Vee!

Cliff Cheever, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Bob wrote on January 14, 2008 7:04 am:
" Helmets do some good in town at in town speeds. However, I for one would prefer to not wear a helmet when traveling on the highways. If a helmet saves my life in an accident at highway speed, you can bet that I'll become that highly disabled person that Sten is worried about. Let me cruise the higways without a helmet and, if in an accident, I'll simply take up a spot in the cemetary and create a job vacancy to help keep our unemployment low. As others have suggested, having no helmet law might also improve the local gene pool... Helmets will actually create more disable people in our society, they only save someones head at low speeds. I also wish we could impose the logic Sten is concerned with on the smokers, drinkers and druggies (and all the other high risk individuals) that eventually become disabled and/or non-productive. "

Jean's letter wrote on January 14, 2008 7:26 am:
" Is a classic example of looking for something to be offended by. You're offended by the name "Ground Zero" because of what it reminds you of, so much so that you have to write a letter to the editor. What about the weekly stories on genocide in the Sudan, political oppression in Kenya, women's rights in the Middle East - you know actual issues facing our world. I'm guessing you have no problem reading all of those stories and then promptly forgetting them. Try getting offended by something real next time. "

PSC Contribution Comment wrote on January 14, 2008 8:23 am:
" "Keep Commissioners Honest": Do you sincerely think that Public Service Commissioners are the only elected officials in our state that take money from industries they vote on? What about Senators who take money from the Teachers Association and then vote on school finance as an example? I wonder why Senator Avery would have introduced a bill like that which did not include a portion dealing with Senators taking money from the industries their votes affect? Or maybe he just wanted his name in the paper as a defender of the public. "Point the thumb, not the finger," as they say. "

Big Chief wrote on January 14, 2008 8:35 am:
" In a recent study done by the NHSTB it said 45% of those who died in motorcycle accidents were NOT wearing a helmet. I guess that means that 55% of those killed in a motorcycle accident WERE wearing a helmet. This was reported in the LJS several months ago for those who want to look it up.

Another thing to consider is the increased amount of spinal injuries caused by a helmet. The four pound (or more) helmet can add more inertial energy to the head and this extra force can mean the difference between the spinal cord separating and causing death or permanant paralysis. I assume that the Doctors and firefighters who have made comments about helmets have taken High School Physics? Maybe you need to do some calculations about mass and acceleration/deceleration. "

Josh wrote on January 14, 2008 9:00 am:
" I hope Jean Page recycles the "Ground Zero" section instead of just throwing it away..... "

Grundle wrote on January 14, 2008 9:15 am:
" I'm glad Jean ignores that section of the paper...she doesn't sound like someone I'd want to run into during a night on the town. "

To Big Chief wrote on January 14, 2008 9:25 am:
" The study by J.P. Goldstein that argues what you suggest (that helmets increase mass and increase likelihood of spinal cord injury) has been refuted by over 12 studies detailing the inaccuracy of that statement. In theory it sounds right - in practice it isn't.

In addition - your comparison of statistics of motorcycle deaths suggests that you're trying to imply that wearing a helmet makes you more likely to die from a motorcycle injury - but that would be a misuse of statistics. Looking at head trauma specifically in helmeted and non-helmeted riders would be more appropriate. The Journal of Trauma published a study at severity of head and neck injuries following the repeal of Arkansas's helmet law and found an increase in unhelmeted riding as well as a significant increase in severe head injuries among those unhelmeted riders. This idea that you can somehow paint helmets to be unsafe is just ridiculous. "

Karl wrote on January 14, 2008 9:43 am:
" How about we do the math of what percentage dies after a crash between who was wearing a helmet and who wasn't? I'm willing to bed those numbers come out a bit different, showing that a helmet does quite a bit to save lives, eh Chief? "

come on wrote on January 14, 2008 10:02 am:
" About the "Ground Zero" topic, it's time to realize that not everything is sacred. "

BobS wrote on January 14, 2008 11:49 am:
" Well said Sten. For those who believe riding a motorcycle without a helmet is their right, in my opinion, "you can't fix stupid." "

rac wrote on January 14, 2008 12:42 pm:
" It's great that Hy-Vee is opening a nice new store at 84th and Adams. Why would they keep a smaller store open that is so close, or let a competitor lease THEIR building? Does that make sense? There is plenty of places a competing grocer can come in in that neighborhood if there is demand. Mr. Cheever, you should at least be honest and state in your letter that you are associated with (owner?) of those "several" apartments there (ie."Cheever Apartments"). "

seeitfirsthand wrote on January 14, 2008 1:23 pm:
" I'm with Mr. Ulrich. I see these injuries firsthand. "Maybe you need to do some calculations about mass and acceleration/deceleration. " this isnt much of a defense. If you dont want to wear a helmet, maybe you should just go visit Madonna rehab hospital. Im sure there are plenty of people there that could sway your decision if they could talk, hear or even know you were in the room. I dont feel like paying your medical bills because you take the position of financial irresponsibility by deciding to not wear your helmet. Good luck to you and I hope that you never need to know what I'm talking about.
"

Jeff wrote on January 14, 2008 2:26 pm:
" Let's see if I understand this right. If you have an accident on a motorcycle, you have a high probability of being dead or permanently disabled whether you have a helmet on or not. Based on other laws of our society, it sounds like we ought to ban motorcycles. It does cost all of us. Society pays this medical expense through our taxes, healthcare insurance premiums, etc. Or perhaps, allow motorcycles in the city only at speeds under 40 mph WITH a helmet. FYI - our local trauma docs support the helmet law - and that's enough for me. They know the outcomes and the statistics - and they feel wearing a helmet should be required. "

Big Chief wrote on January 14, 2008 2:50 pm:
" Even if the motorcycle helmet law is repealed I will wear a helmet except under certain conditions. I want to be able to make that choice though instead of the government making it for me. The one time I probably will not wear a helmet is when it is hot & humid. Any other time I will probably wear my helmet.

One other thing that concerns me: Under current law if an unhelmeted rider is involved in an accidents but it is totally the fault of the other driver, will the guilty party be absolved of liability because of the motorcyclists did not wear a helmet?

The stats can be found to support both sides of the argument. "

SB wrote on January 14, 2008 3:07 pm:
" The National Transportation Safety Boards’ numbers show that just over 50% of fatally injured were wearing a helmet. The North Carolina study basically said it would cost the general public an average $500k per year in additional tax requirements and additional insurance premiums if they repealed their helmet law – this is the extreme case when things like additional insurance coverage and age requirements are not added as stipends. This seems pretty low considering the state’s additional revenue potential with a no-helmet law - and is nowhere near the costs that I pay in public healthcare costs for you to smoke, drink, have an abortion, have kids, or eat a bigmac – and if you’re going to argue head injuries from automobile accidents costs taxpayers then let’s get helmets in cars. I won’t argue helmets don’t save lives, but I do believe they prevent accidents as any rider can tell you they can see and hear so much more and are so much more aware of their surroundings without a helmet – and keeping your awareness is very good when riding with all those cars cutting me off or turning in my lane. "

Captain Logic wrote on January 14, 2008 4:05 pm:
" Yikes. Might want to re-read that physics book, Chief. Then move on to college-level physics, engineering, and statistics. Helmets are beneficial. "

mark wrote on January 14, 2008 4:23 pm:
" re: HyVee. Here's the deal: HyVee doesn't force you to buy a particular product (or even where to shop). Your money is yours, their money is theirs. There's nothing in the constitution that says we get what we want. Sorry. And it sounds like you're old enough to have fought against socialism - why do you want mandated economies now? "

MarkyMark wrote on January 14, 2008 4:44 pm:
" Historically Ground Zero has been the epicenter of a Nuclear Explosion. I think the Bush Administration with all the cute names for their wars, battles, and operations used the Ground Zero name innacurately, to describe the World Trade Center site immediately after 9/11. I also believe the newspaper used the name before 9/11. I myself am offened because the funnies aren't funny. "

Oh Big Chief and SB wrote on January 14, 2008 5:29 pm:
" Trying to argue that helmets actually make motorocycles less safe is like arguing that the smoking ban is wrong because cigarettes make you cool and relaxed. "

stignob wrote on January 14, 2008 6:32 pm:
" Brilliant. Why don't we just ban cars, which cause the motorcycles to crash anyway. Plus they would be more environment friendly. This is about individual freedom, please don't dictate what other people should or shouldn't do, it's not very American. "

Big Chief wrote on January 14, 2008 8:07 pm:
" Are those of you who support mandatory helmet laws for motorcycles willing to support mandatory helmets for occupants of cars also? I doubt it because you all probably drive cars. I think Ernie nailed it when he called those opposed to LB253 hypocrites. "

Laurie wrote on January 14, 2008 8:30 pm:
" What's going to happen to that HyVee store if it is unoccupied by another grocery? Neighborhood eyesore? 48th and Leighton is not very close to 84th and Adams, especially for people who have trouble getting around. Why is another store at that location such a threat? HyVee is entitled to do whatever they want, I guess, and mark, you are correct... my money is mine. In my neighborhood, I have a choice between HyVee and Russ's... and guess who gets my business from now on. "

Sara wrote on January 14, 2008 9:49 pm:
" HyVee...I just recently visited the HyVee on 48th and Leighton on my way home from Bryan Hospital. I thought I would make a quick stop in to pick up a few needed items. I was totally disquested with number one the parking lot in which I had to park in a huge puddle of water and number two, I thought the store was understaffed for the time of day I was there. It was approximately 4:30 and I had to wait in line for about twelve minutes. The clerk that checked me out had totally no social skills with the public and I would have to say I was ashamed to be in the store. I typically go to the store on 27th and Superior and there I am treated like a Queen. I am totally for the store on 48th and Leighton closing down and even though out of my way look forward the the new store on 84th opening as well as the store on 'O' Sreet eventually opening. But I do hope by all means that HyVee will hire some more "people friendly" clerks. They need help in that area!
"

Oh Big Chief (again) wrote on January 14, 2008 10:34 pm:
" There are obvious structural differences between a car and a motorocycle. Like soft interiors, seat belts (prevent your head from going through the windshield and hitting the glass) and of course - air bags. So that comparison is a equally silly as the idea that helmets make motorcycles dangerous. "

Don wrote on January 14, 2008 11:16 pm:
" Just obey the law, wear a helmet and quit all the complaining. It is getting old reading about it. "

Hey Sten.... wrote on January 15, 2008 2:35 pm:
" how many car accidents do you see? How many of those accidents do people have head trauma or neck and back trauma? I then propose all car drivers have to wear helmets and wear a different for of seatbelt that protects you from spinal injury. I would like to know the car accident to motorcycle accident ration. Then I would like to know how many of those motorcycle accidents were caused by vehicles. And out of the vehicle accidents know how much bodily harm was done. Should we just wear a body suit when driving a car? You people don't see the point, I live in a "free" country but yet I have to wear a helmet and seatbelt BY LAW! You all maybe ok with your individual freedoms beind stripped away from you, but I am not. My life, My choices. "

Teacher wrote on January 16, 2008 7:11 pm:
" Culler, I appreciate the time Jane R. took to write a letter concerning Culler and NCLB. Well thought out and shares some of the concerns of NCLB. I applaud Jane "