Now
Mostly Cloudy
57°
High
75°
Low
51°

Report illuminates poverty in Lincoln

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By KENDRA WALTKE / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Jan 11, 2008 - 12:34:29 am CST

Poverty can hide in Lincoln.

It does not show itself in the form of extensive slums or hordes of homeless people begging on the street.

Here, it mostly hides inside chilly homes and in the form of late payments, and it’s masked by a variety of community solutions.

Food-filled backpack program expands

Lincoln Journal Star

Three schools will join the Food Bank of Lincoln’s BackPack Program today.

Norwood Park will distribute food-filled backpacks Fridays to 35 students. At Saratoga School, 50 students are enrolled. And a program starting at Bennet Elementary will benefit 10 students and their families.

As of Friday, there will be 833 students and families benefiting from the BackPack Program.

The Food Bank's Scott Young said the program's growth has far exceeded expectations.

"Unfortunately, we are a long way from meeting the need. There are 5,208 kids in Lincoln's elementary schools who are participating in the free lunch program at LPS. We have a long way to go and grow before we can begin talking about meeting the entire need."

Southwood Lutheran is responsible for the program at Saratoga, and Capitol City Christian church is responsible for the program at Norwood Park. The Bennet backpacks will be stored and packed at Bennet Community Church.

Dozens of churches are involved with the program, and a special Christmas Eve offering at Berean Church resulted in a gift to the program that will result in over 5,700 distributed backpacks.

As of today, the backpacks are distributed in 12 Lincoln public schools, three Lincoln parochial schools, and elementary schools in Milford, Seward and Bennet.

How poverty affects Lincoln,  and how each person could help,  isn’t an issue that begs for an answer here.

But Lincoln Action Program is looking for one anyway, and it is challenging the public to help.

On Thursday, LAP rolled out its part in a nationwide campaign titled “Rooting Out Poverty.”

With it, agency leaders hope to raise awareness of need in Lincoln, where they said more than 33,000 people live below the federal poverty line.

“Convincing this community that there is poverty in Lincoln is a tough job,” said Executive Director Sue Hinrichs.

Many Lincoln agencies work together to target poverty — The Center for People in Need, The Food Bank and LAP among them — but poverty remains pervasive.

“What we hope to do through ‘Rooting Out Poverty’ is identify the gaps in what isn’t being provided here,” said Rebecca Christensen, director of grants and communications for Lincoln Action Program.

“We would like people to tell us, ‘What kind of impact could you have? What can you do?’”

The campaign will involve “a lot of one-on-one, sit-down time with key people ... key community leaders and key funders,” she said.

“The short-term plan in the next two months is to make a lot of phone calls and visits.”

The “Rooting Out Poverty” report incorporated input from more than a thousand community action programs nationwide. It gives general strategies, to be modified at the local level, toward five main goals:

* Maximize participation to ensure those in need are informed and involved in available programs.

* Build an economy that works for everyone, ensuring that each community provides a wide range of jobs.

* Invest in the future, providing training to develop the knowledge and skills of workers and children.

* Maximize equality of opportunity, providing equal access to chances for personal and professional growth and advancement.

* Ensure healthy people and places, providing access to adequate health care and weatherizing homes to prevent high heating and cooling costs.

“This gives us a piece of material that we can take into the community and see what they can do,” Christensen said.

Although the campaign will focus on contact with civic leaders, community groups and businesses, individuals also will be challenged to get involved.

“This means involving everyone in the community, rich, poor and in between,”  Hinrichs said.

In Lincoln, 12.7 percent of residents live in poverty, according to the Community Services Initiative, which was developed by a collaboration of human services agencies,

That means 33,926 people live at or below the federal poverty line, which in 2007 was $10,210 for a one-person home, $20,650 for a household of four.

Fifty-three percent of those rely on food stamps, Christensen said.

Other studies have shown a person in Lincoln must earn at least $11.81 per hour to afford a modest two-bedroom rental — “much more than the minimum wage,” Christensen noted.

LAP offers 20 programs that target poverty and offers referrals to other agencies.

It provides career training, computer classes, GED and youth development courses, early childhood programs, refugee and immigrant services, utility assistance, neighborhood revitalitization and more.

It helps people like Nabil Shokai, a Sudanese refugee who came to Lincoln in 2005 and took career training at LAP. Today, he is an Americorps volunteer, getting work experience while helping other refugees with paperwork and resettlement.

“For 10 years I had no job, no work, when I was in the jungle  (as a refugee). This was a way for me to get back to work,” he said.

Shokai said he sees needy people who overcome one obstacle, such as transportation to a job, only to be set back by another, such as an inability to afford child care.

“When people start to help themselves, they get blocked by one thing and are back at the beginning. We have to find solutions to stop the cycle,” he said.

Hinrichs and Christensen hope the campaign will help produce some of those solutions.

“We’re putting out the call in 2008 to really take a realistic approach,” Hinrichs said. “A meaningful approach that comes up with solutions to solve the problem of poverty.”

Reach Kendra Waltke at 473-7303 or kwaltke@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
LAP lover wrote on January 11, 2008 1:05 am:
" Since poverty ridden people smoke, we can raise the cigarette tax and that will urge them to move away. Then we won't need to provide additional assistance! Great idea! huh? That way, poor people can once again pay for the new arena, where, of course, they will be forbidden to smoke. They pay, we play! yea, yea, yea!!! "

I'm poor. wrote on January 11, 2008 1:11 am:
" Uh, poverty has been in and around Lincoln for a very long time. Did the City just "discover" that lots of people are poor? Wow, glad they pay attention. Kudos to teachers at schools that do such a good job trying to care for students. You don't have to but you do. "

???? wrote on January 11, 2008 7:09 am:
" No mention of People's City Mission? They are a major player in the war on poverty in Lincoln at this time. Could it be that there is a little jealousy and competition among the agencies here? Perhaps care for the poor is not really the bottom line. "

SW wrote on January 11, 2008 7:58 am:
" You are correct "???" People's city mission does play a major and important role in addressing poverty in Lincoln. As a homeless shelter, however, they serve families and individuals who are already having severe problems due to homelessness. I think this article is about an effort to coordinate more widespread efforts to address systemic issues that lead to poverty and homelessness in the first place and which make poverty so terribly destructive for families and children. Therefore, I am not outraged or calling "conspiracy" that the Mission was not mentioned in this article. I recall a front page story on them earlier this week. "

Dano wrote on January 11, 2008 8:26 am:
" The article asks what is really needed here. How about better places to work that fast food, stores, and restaruants. Why not try promoting some kind of manufacturing, food / dry goods production, or basic service industry related jobs. You can;t expect the poorer households to beter themselves if the opportunity to do so, doesn't itself. "

Cal Naughton Jr. wrote on January 11, 2008 8:40 am:
" Of those 33,000 people below the poverty line 20,000 of those people are college students. The poverty number is very misleading, and with a population such as Lincoln and the number of college students the ratio is very disproportionate. Subtract the 20,000 students from the 33,000 and you have 13,000 people out of a population of 225,000 and you have a meager 5.7% compared to the national average of 12.7%. "

DA - Self sufficient wrote on January 11, 2008 9:21 am:
" PLEASE focus on teaching and requiring self-sufficieny. I am tired of people who remain "low income" for a lifetime because it is easier and more beneficial than working hard and earning their way. Quit giving hand outs! "

Don't get it. wrote on January 11, 2008 9:21 am:
" How can there still be poverty with Bush's tax cuts? "

Join the croud wrote on January 11, 2008 9:25 am:
" They're pretty much talking about young or middle class
workerable people. There is a mass of retireds that worked hard their whole lives preparing for retirement,
then the city and schools find it laughable to raise taxes
and get rich salaries, while retireds on fixed incomes,
except teachers, shell hundreds more in taxes and watch
their retirement go down the drain. All cities have
the poverty and homeless problem, but not all spend like
Lincoln or their property taxes are half Lincolns. I moved
from a city with half the taxes of Lincoln, supported the
poverty & homeless all my life there, but I won't give
a dime here where my property taxes have gone up $600.00
in three years. My property taxes went up $300.00 in
my former city in 30 years. People gave to help the
poverty & homeless with low taxes, if they don't in
Lincoln, theres a pretty good reason. I know alot of
retired people barely keeping their heads above water,
so I would say your figures are way off. Not much
future when theres no jobs for the workable and the retired are being drained. "

marci wrote on January 11, 2008 9:38 am:
" Is it time for the sponsors of refugees to take the responsibility of their support instead of dumping their charges onto the social service groups in the community? I have observed that any time there is an activity for the benefit of low income individuals the overwhelming majority of the people are immigrants. LAP seems to have a disproportionate large number of immigrants recieving services to the demigrafics of the poor in Lincoln. I know of citizens who have been turned away from them for services because they do pick and choose who they serve, while taking taxpayer dollars. This push for a study seems to be a way to recieve grant money. Having large families is not a right... It is a responsibility. If one cannot afford to support large families, stop having children when you discover that outside help is needed to support the family you already have.
The welfare office has a cop on duty and employees are behind locked doors and glass partitions. Ten years ago this was not the case. What has happened?
Having a car, cell phone, TV, microwave, video games, and dishwasher are things one aquires when ones' income affords them these luxuries. Not when ones stands in line for a hand out.
I'm well above the poverty level but do get around to observe. "

great message wrote on January 11, 2008 9:40 am:
" What a great reminder of how poverty effects our ENTIRE community. It's not just hungry people,poverty is so much bigger then that. Pat on the back to Lincoln Action Program (and other human service agencies)for stepping up and calling for not just awareness, but action by the community. No, not all the agencies doing good work are mentioned in the article - but it was not an article about the entire community and every single agency. All of these agency's work together with eachother through referals etc. They do incredible work. "

Could wrote on January 11, 2008 10:08 am:
" it be that it costs so much in lincoln to live? I don't know why people move to lincoln in the first place. People who can't afford the high cost should probably go to a smaller town where property is cheaper. I know about the gas price and the driving, but, if they qualify for government assistance why work? "

Poverty Tithes wrote on January 11, 2008 10:11 am:
" When I was a younger (and dummer) man, I belonged to a church that insisted I tithe 10% of my income. This monthly cash tithe (which I peformed religiously) effectively placed myself, my three children and my stay at home mom below the federal poverty line. I wonder how many churches today have the same kind of prescription for their young families? Poverty does hide, and you'll find it in some very unlikely places. "

jess wrote on January 11, 2008 10:41 am:
" I am glad the LJS included an article on this vitally important issue. Kudos to LAP and the other agencies that are working to improve the lives of people in poverty in this community. As Gandhi noted, "poverty is the worst form of violence."
"

Poverty Nexus wrote on January 11, 2008 11:20 am:
" The report is good but it would be more useful if it described what an $11.81 an hour lifestyle looked like:
food/meal, clothing, transportation, entertainment, housing choices. Also what are the "connections" between
LAP, the Food Bank, the County, Matt Talbot, the City Mission. Can we have some photos please? "

Sean1 wrote on January 11, 2008 11:30 am:
" The Omaha TV stations recently reported a large increase in the homeless population in the city. A director for one of the shelters there stated that a main factor in the growth was "The generosity of the people of Omaha." It's the same principle as the city of San Francisco subscribes to. If you feed them, they will come.1 "

$20,650 for a household of four wrote on January 11, 2008 2:58 pm:
" That's about average pay in the US Military. "

Jobs out there wrote on January 11, 2008 3:01 pm:
" You may not get the exact job you want, but you'll earn money.
I spent 1 day interviewing between Omaha and Lincoln, 4 job offers right away. Anybody can do it, they just won't thanks to our welfare system. "

wow wrote on January 11, 2008 4:17 pm:
" there sure are a lot of self righteous people out and about posting today. Do you honestly think that its really that easy? I do have a good job, great benifits, and a good chance for promotion. I am a single parent of two kids, and I pay way to much for rent in Lincoln, you cant go to a small town because rent is higher there. They do not want a lot of city people moving there. Rent is way to high in this town, if you dont believe me, go out and look, some of the houses that are for rent are dumps and they are not by any means cheap rentals. I pay 700.00 a month for rent on a three bedroom that is not a great house. Its the best that i looked at for the price range. I do not qualify for any assistance, such as food stamps, energy assistance, or anything like that, and I, according to this article am one of the lower income families. I make more than the $11 that it mentions, but still I am struggling to survive. Its really sad how many people dont get it. Its not only students and minorities that are lower income, and its sad that the upper and middle class believe that. Go ahead and step out of your bubble and look around you. Life isnt easy for everyone. I work very hard to support my kids, I dont owe anyone money, but for those of you who think that all of us who are lower income are sucking off the government, you are sadly mistaken. "

Indian Hills? wrote on January 11, 2008 4:22 pm:
" Poverty tithes sounds familiar... "

Uh-uh wrote on January 11, 2008 4:43 pm:
" No, you're drawing a bad conclusion to think they're including college students in this study. Income is based on information from tax filings, and most students are not considered citizens of Lincoln, but from their home town or state. AND, not that many of them are poverty-poor. They're often still dependents of their parents. Think, if you don't at least go look up the facts. "

Want to move OUT of small town to Lincoln wrote on January 11, 2008 4:50 pm:
" Hey Id give anything to be able to sell my house and move to Lincoln, but noone in this place can get a high enough paying job ($10) an hour to buy it!! My property taxes are ridiculouse to live in a place with no shopping, nothing to do, and an out of control METH problem!! HELP!! "

Cal Naughton Jr. wrote on January 11, 2008 9:59 pm:
" "Uh-oh" sounds like you need to do your research. As of 2003 approximately 1 in 5 full time students who attended UNL were from Lincoln. That's 4,000 students from Lincoln. Now account for the 9,000 students at SECC Lincoln, the 4,000 students at Wesleyan, The 1,000 students at Union College, assuming the ratio remains constant, we are looking at 7,700 students FROM Lincoln pursuing higher education IN Lincoln who file taxes IN Lincoln, who make their residence IN Lincoln. I could go on and on, there are plenty of other local universities that are unaccounted for such as Kaplan, Bryan School of Nursing, Doane, Bellevue, etc all located in Lincoln. Not everyone goes away for college, statistically speaking 78% of the students that attended UNL are from Nebraska. 20% are from Lincoln. It doesn't matter if they live with their parents or not, all that matters is that they file their taxes IN Lincoln, have a residence IN Lincoln and make less than the $10,210 a year qualifying them as impoverished. I know when I was at UNL I wasn't making $10K a year and going to school full time. I am from Lincoln, a resident and file my taxes here during my tenure at UNL. I was considered impoverished by federal guidelines, but was I poor? Absolutely not. I lived with my parents I claimed myself, my parents couldn't claim me as a dependent or I wouldn't get federal aid. Again, the numbers are inflated and don't give a true number as to the people who are truly impoverished and in need. I think the number is much lower than what is reported by these agencies who are funded by the government and are subject to reporting their "statistics" for funding each year. "

volunteers are needed wrote on January 11, 2008 10:43 pm:
" Sue Hinrichs and the LAP staff have difficult jobs, which could be made much easier if we could volunteer our resources to these worthy programs. Sadly, many of these staff also fall into very low income categories. Still, they give their time, talent and hope. Thanks to all of you. "

Rhonda wrote on January 11, 2008 10:53 pm:
" "Cal" you really need to do a little research on how poverty levels are actually figured. Yes students are most likely under the poverty level but they are also not figured into the equasion. When you file taxes as a student you are asked if you are a part-time or full-time student, if you aren't asked you need to get someone to do your taxes cause your missing out. These agencies use tax returns and then kicks out those that are considered full or part time students. Poverty is hear you can bury your head in the sand and say NO NO NO but your just fooling yourself. Pull all the numbers you want out of a hat to make your point but it still doesn't make you right. "

Personal responsibility wrote on January 11, 2008 11:27 pm:
" If you are only making $10k for a single family and $20k for a family of four that doesn't mean Lincoln is expensive to live, that mean you have an income problem. If you are living off of minimum wage every city in America is going to be expensive. Open the paper there are tons of $10hr jobs that don't require college degrees or much experience and that would double your income. "

nice wrote on January 12, 2008 12:23 am:
" poverty ? what are you talking about ? to all you that think there is poverty in lincoln or anywhere in the U.S. WAKE UP we are in good prosperous times!! if you dont think so just listen/watch a white house press conference




1 "

Cal Naughton Jr. wrote on January 12, 2008 6:35 am:
" "Rhonda" Pulling my statistics out of a hat? I think not, UNL publishes their enrollment every year and the demographics. All of the local universities publish their enrollment, look it up, I state factual information. I never claimed that poverty didn't exist in Lincoln, I simply stated that the numbers are inflated. By federal guideline standards I was impoverished at the time, with me being the typical college student, I know that there were many more in my situation. Actually I never did my own taxes our family accountant did. I wasn't a finance major. My numbers are very real. What data do you have to support your claim that everyone in this study isn't a full time student? You claim that the full time student's information is disregarded but how do we know that? It doesn't state anywhere in the article. Do you work for LAP? Do you have a bias? I don't have that bias, my information is factual and unbiased. I know the need is real, I know poverty is real, however I believe this study conducted by LAP is skewed and the numbers are inflated. "

Cal Naughton Jr. wrote on January 12, 2008 10:40 am:
" Rhonda, check your facts before you spout off your diatribe. This is how the US Census calculates poverty. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/povdef.html Nowhere in the article does it disambiguate college students and poverty sans students that live in dorms. My references support my claims that students are included in the poverty calculations. The poverty population is an inflated number in Lincoln Nebraska. "

jb wrote on January 12, 2008 12:24 pm:
" Cal Naughton Jr, a lot of the people going to community college are also working fulltime and not in the poverty catagory anyway, so get your facts straight too. My husband goes to school FT and works FT and makes over $30k a year. I can understand the UNL students, but at the community college a lot of students work FT and make way more than the poverty line. I know many of them. "

Carol wrote on January 12, 2008 1:03 pm:
" Cal, while you may not be claimed as a dependent by your parents, most are until it makes financial sense. REGARDLESS, using your new figure of 7,700 suspected impoverished college students instead of the acknowledgedly inflated number of 20,000, we get 7700/225,000 = 11.2% below the poverty level, much nearer the national average.
Additionally, if you can't afford to rent a 3-bedroom house, try an apartment or have you children share a room. You can rent a 2 bedroom apartment for $500/month. "

Bo Ho wrote on January 12, 2008 6:13 pm:
" I know alot of people that make a good living. Doing nothing but walking to the mailbox.
With ADC, EPT cards, Housing, Lincoln Action and walfare ect. Who is the dumb one.
The guy going to work and paying taxes or the person who gets up and goes to work everyday at$11.19 an hour, witch I think of as good money "

andy wrote on January 12, 2008 8:35 pm:
" the federal poverty line has little to do with real poverty. the "poor" in America are rich compared to the rest of the world. Give it a break. this is just a fundraising attempt by some group that depends on donations backed by guilt to pay the bills. "

Nebraskan wrote on January 12, 2008 8:41 pm:
" As a baby boomer who grew up in rural Nebraska in the 50's & 60's, we were always well below the "federal poverty guidelines." At the time, I did not even realize it. My parents would not have wanted their poverty "rooted out," because they took pride in being able to take care of their own family. We could have had food stamps or free lunches, but we did not apply for either. We simply lived a very meager, thrifty life. We did not have running water or air conditioning, and a wood stove sat in the middle of the house, so our utility bills were minimal. Today's technology had not been invented yet, so there was no need for computers, cell phones, DVD players, video games, etc., which many of today's so-called poverty families have. I would have enjoyed having a bike, board games, or record player, which many of my friends had, but my vivid imagination and library books (as well as older siblings) entertained me just fine. As an adult my husband and I were able to rise above poverty, in part because of the way we had both been brought up to live within our means and conserve resources. My children seldom wore disposable diapers, I sewed most of our clothes for many years, and we all knew that furniture need not be new. Had we received handouts and "expected" government programs to help us out, I doubt I would have grown up to be as self-sufficient and thankful for my parents' good example as I am now. "

Doug wrote on February 7, 2008 7:57 pm:
" After having reviewed some of the reader responses, I am curious how the readers define "poverty", and poverty of what?
For anyone who lives below the poverty line or maybe homeless, what would make a difference in your life? Sift through all the superficial "stuff" and dig deep inside yourself. What would or what makes a difference in your life? "