Now
Fair
31°
High
34°
Low
11°

Lincoln senator wants more low-income kids' health insurance

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 - 07:36:27 pm CST

A bill that would provide government health insurance to more children in low-income families “is simply a small step toward making sure Nebraska children have access to health care,” said Lincoln Sen. Bill Avery.

His bill (LB818) would raise the income level cut-off so more families would qualify for the Medicaid health care program for children that the state calls Kids Connection and the federal government calls SCHIP, or State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

Right now, Nebraska families that earn no more than 185 percent of the federal poverty level can qualify for the Kids Connection program. Under the 2007 poverty guideline, that’s a gross income of $38,203 for a family of four.

Related Link(s):

Avery’s bill would move that cutoff to 200 percent of the poverty level, or $41,300 gross annual income for a family of four.

Nebraska would move closer to the mainstream with the bill. All surrounding states cover the children of families at 200 percent of the poverty level, except for Missouri,  which covers families at 300 percent of the poverty level or below, Avery said.

Most of the parents in these families have jobs, he said.

“They are working families. They are not deadbeats. They are working and struggling. They just don’t have income to pay for health insurance,” he said.

Avery’s bill is one of two measures, introduced Thursday, that would increase Medicaid coverage.

The state’s Medicaid program would cover smoking cessation programs and medication, under a bill (LB807) sponsored by Grand Island Sen. Ray Aguilar.

Medicare, a government program primarily for seniors, covers smoking cessation costs. But Nebraska’s Medicaid program, a government program for very low-income adults and children, does not help with these costs, Aguilar pointed out. Medication that helps people quit smoking can cost as much as $200 a month.

The state’s Health and Human Services Department staff had no estimates on the increased cost to taxpayers for either bill because the agency does not provide that kind of information until the public hearing on a bill, according to agency spokeswoman Marla Augustine.

But Aguilar argues that his bill would save money in the long run by reducing the number of people on Medicaid who smoke.

An estimated 33,500 Nebraskans on Medicaid smoke, according to research by Aguilar’s office. Based on the extra cardiovascular medical cost for smokers, the state could save about $4 million in seven years if 14 percent of those people quit smoking.

Studies indicate that 14 percent of smokers who attempt to quit with counseling and medications succeed. That’s twice the success rate for people who try to stop without any help.

Several statewide anti-poverty groups support increasing the number of families who can use the Kids Connection program.

While the costs of health care and insurance coverage have dramatically increased, Nebraska has never raised the income level for access to the program, said Jennifer Carter, director of the health care access program for the Nebraska Appleseed Center of Law in the Public Interest.

The average cost of employer-based health insurance is about $4,344 a year, according to the Economic Policy Institute. That’s about $362 a month, or 11 percent of the annual income of a family at 185 percent of the federal poverty level, said Sarah Ann Lewis, policy coordinator for Voices for Children, a nonprofit that focuses on children’s issues.

Last year an average of 23,919 children a month were covered under the Kid’s Connection program. Last fiscal year, the medical care cost about $43.75 million, with about 70 percent of the funding coming from the federal government, according to HHS figures.

Avery also pointed to Nebraska’s neighbors. Kansas and South Dakota cover children whose family income is at 200 percent of the poverty level or below, Wyoming, Colorado and Iowa at 200 percent of the poverty level. Missouri at 300 percent.

“Can’t we do better? Do we care less for our children than our neighbors?”

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
This is smart public policy wrote on January 10, 2008 7:45 pm:
" Surrounding states are taking the 70 cents on the dollar from the federal government to help cover this kids with good health insurance. Nebraska needs to realize that if we do not do this other state have no problem taking our portion of the pie. And besides if our heartless houses representatives Terry, Fortenberry, and Smith we would not need to be doing this at the state level. "

sensible social policy wrote on January 10, 2008 8:51 pm:
" Even if it was expensive, I'd support this, because it's good health policy, but it also is good economic policy. It makes sense to ask for our share of the federal money to improve the health of our own citizens. It helps children and families, and by improving their health, it helps the standard of living in Nebraska. And, of course, the match money is coming from taxes that we have already paid to the federal government. If Nebraska won't use the Medicaid system to draw upon federal dollars, I'm sure all of our neighboring states will have no problem spending our share. "

Douglas Novak wrote on January 11, 2008 5:56 am:
" Getting our share of the federal "pie" is a very lame excuse for spending money. Drive around rural Nebraska and see how the County Commissioners used this strategy to build $500,000 bridges that go no where and carry no traffic. BUT they only had to spend a little bit becasue the rest was our share of the "pie". As a taxpayer the hurt is the same if the money comes from my left pocket or my right pocket. This "pie" concept is very, very, very cloudy thinking. My children are grown and I paid a lot for health insurance and had to cut back a lot in other areas todo so. Why should I now pay for children's the health insurance of a family of four with income of $41,300? This is ridiculous. On second thought, it is communism. Let's hear more about the qualifications for this program. How about if the parents smoke away their money with tobacco they can't be eligible for Health Insurance Welfare for their children? How about if they have 2 arrests for DUI their parents can't be eligible? How are these parents held accountable for eligibility? Are they just trying to get their share of the state "pie"? Thank you COngress for placing stop on this out of control program at teh Federal level. "

Sally Herrin wrote on January 11, 2008 7:40 am:
" Thanks to Senator Avery for introducing this important piece of legislation. I plan to call my state senator and ask her to support LB818. "

as wrote on January 11, 2008 8:34 am:
" Ok please tell me why taxpayers should pay for health insurance for kids of a family that makes over $40K a year? Ridiculous!!! I make way less than that & still pay for my own kids & my insurance & we're a family of 4... "

dan wrote on January 11, 2008 9:05 am:
" I think this would be great. I am a health insurance agent and see families who were on kids connection and then all of asudden the father takes on a part time job so they can afford groceries or something like that and with the extra couple hundred bucks a month they were not eligible anymore for medicaid. Sad deal. As far as wgat Mr. Novak had said about if the kids parents smoke they shouldn't be eligible. That is a bunch of B.S.!! We can't punish children for their parents actions. If anything they are in more need of insurance or access to it because of the smoke in the house. They will be going to the doctor more. Or need to. If the family doesn't have any insurance then when the child is sick there are many times that the child doesn't go to the doctor because they can't afford it. Plain and simple...I have seen it many times. I all for LB818. "