Now
Fair
86°
High
87°
Low
67°

Mead ethanol plant files for bankruptcy protection

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ART HOVEY / Lincoln Journal Star

Monday, Dec 03, 2007 - 07:05:02 pm CST

Nebraska’s most cutting-edge ethanol plant has fallen off the financial edge.

E3 BioFuels at Mead, built to use the manure from 30,000 cattle as an energy source, has filed for bankruptcy protection less than six months after it began making grain-based fuel.

Speaking from Shawnee, Kan., on Monday, company spokesman R.J. Wilson tried to put an optimistic twist on a dark development.

Story Photo
The E3 Biofuels Ethanol Plant in Mead. (Lee Enterprises File)

“We are into a gradual phase down of operations,” Wilson said. “And we’re hopeful that, through the reorganization of Chapter 11, we will be able to come out the other side and be fully operational.”

Former company president David Hallberg of Omaha put together the closed-loop technology that allowed plant operators to deliver wet distillers grain to an adjoining feedlot and to turn hundreds of tons of manure per year into methane.

Kansan Dennis Langley acquired a majority interest in the $80 million project in early 2005 as it moved into the construction phase.

Along the way to production, the closed-loop design was singled out for praise by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the top administrator at the Environmental Protection Agency, and other people of influence in the energy sector.

But behind the scenes, mechanical problems that Wilson said had nothing to do with the manure-methane conversion were asserting themselves.

Because of what he described as “start-up failures,” the plant never got close to its rated capacity of 25 million gallons of ethanol per year.

Declining prices for ethanol and high prices for corn also took their toll on profit potential. But Wilson said management could have withstood those cost pressures “if we had achieved substantial completion when we were supposed to.”

The E3 bankruptcy comes at a time when the growing economic challenges of ethanol production have attracted an outpouring of skepticism about the future from a wide array of investment experts.

But Todd Sneller, administrator of the Nebraska Ethanol Board, said the E3 setback needs to be examined from an E3 perspective.

In that regard, said Sneller, “any time there’s a new technological wrinkle that’s often proven as the first of its type, it tends to experience developmental problems.”

Furthermore, from the beginning, according to Sneller, E3 was a corn-processing plant that happened to make ethanol.

“They scaled the ethanol production to match the cattle production,” he said, “so, by design, that ethanol facility was smaller than any other contemporary ethanol production unit.”

While E3’s Wilson alluded to prospects for a second try at success “sometime soon,” the bankruptcy filing of last Friday included dozens of pages of creditors that want to be paid.

As one measure of the dimensions of that problem, the 20 largest unsecured claims add up to about $3.25 million. The largest entry on that list is Dilling Mechanical Contractors of Logansport, Ind., at $1.4 million.

The approximately 600 residents of Mead, located about 35 miles north of Lincoln, are also on the creditor list through their town board, because its five members provided tax increment financing for the project.

But Nate Mongan, board chairman, said there is no liability attached to that arrangement, because all it does is route any tax income back to the project for a period of years so that the money can be spent for development purposes.

Mongan said that doesn’t diminish the disappointment.

“It looked like a project that was going to work,” he said. “We were really excited about it.”

Now, “we’re hopeful, with restructuring, that there’s a possibility the plant will re-open and resume producing ethanol.”

Disappointment may run deeper for Hallberg, also a member of the Nebraska Ethanol Board, and he made no secret of his feelings when sought out in Omaha.

Hallberg bowed out of any management role almost three years ago.

“I personally did not like the way Mr. Langley did business,” he said, “and, for that reason, I felt very strongly about separating ourselves.

“I guess, in hindsight, I feel very bad about the facility, about the community, etc.”

Beyond that, “I believe we’ll get it fixed,” Hallberg said, “because it’s not the technology program. It’s a management situation. I have a great deal of confidence it will be brought back together.

“And if I have anything to say about it, I will be involved in it.”

Hallberg joined Sneller in rejecting suggestions that bankruptcy in Mead cast a larger shadow over the future of the industry. “There’s ups and downs,” he said. “It’s a tough business, a commodity business.”

But, he said, E3 technology still represents “the wave of the future” and “this is just something we’ll have to get past.”

Buck Wehrbein, who manages the feedlot that is also owned by Langley, said a gradual shutdown of the plant over the next five weeks would not be a major disruption to beef production.

“We are feeding wet product here and we will continue to purchase wet product from other ethanol plants,” Wehrbein said.

He also noted that the ethanol plant and the feedlot are “separately financed and separately owned.”

The potential remains for the feedlot to eventually get all the ethanol byproducts put into the cattle ration from right next door.

“We never did stop using outside feedstuffs,” Wehrbein said, “because they were never able to operate at full capacity.”

Reach Art Hovey at 523-4949 or ahovey@alltel.net.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
whatever wrote on December 3, 2007 12:09 pm:
" Only the first. "

Gregg wrote on December 3, 2007 12:11 pm:
" That's too bad. Sounds like a really intelligent design for an ethanol plant. Too bad another company can't bail them out. "

oh, oh wrote on December 3, 2007 12:12 pm:
" Sounds like we are going to need more subsidies and more mandates. In other words, lobbyists get busy wooing Nebraska's politicians to extract more cash from those that pay taxes in Nebraska (which isn't that many people). Booddoggle 101. "

Rob wrote on December 3, 2007 1:03 pm:
" Deterioration of the ethanol market. Like that is a surprise. "

John D. Rockafeller wrote on December 3, 2007 1:37 pm:
" Big Oil owns you farm boys. What you need to learn here is don't even try to come up with an alternative energy source. "

Des wrote on December 3, 2007 2:43 pm:
" Can you say, "Uh, oh..."? "

Douglas Novak, Crete wrote on December 3, 2007 2:48 pm:
" Capitalism at it's finest. Only the best run operations will survive regardless the production subsidy or incentive. Chapter 11 will not save this organization without better management. Every good operation with machinery has built into their budget a contingency for mechanical failure no matter what the industry. I certainly mever expected all of the ethanol plants to be profitable and survive. To do so would be foolish. "

Scott wrote on December 3, 2007 4:36 pm:
" It's not just bad management that caused this, it's bad government. Just because we seem to have plenty of corn doesn't make it a good idea to base an energy industry on that, any more than having plenty of wind, hydropower or oil did or does. Letting self-promoters write policy is not a panacea. If only Warren Buffett were in energy... "

Joe wrote on December 3, 2007 7:14 pm:
" I believe Ethanol is a very promising industry. But, there definitely needs to be regulations on the size of animal confinements and number per area. The air, ground and water polution from confinements is grave. "

Bust wrote on December 3, 2007 7:55 pm:
" The Governor has said on several occassions that we will overbuild for the ethanol market by at least one plant. Anytime you provide the state subsidies like NE has, you can be assured there will be far too many more than the market can support. But don't look for Governor Dave to have anytning to do with pulling back on the subsidies. He's too busy fighting against UNL efforts to build real economic capabilities into our state's economy. Of course, it would be nice to see the Gov. get HHS waste and fraud under control, too. "

DBM wrote on December 3, 2007 8:51 pm:
" And so it begins. Ethanol isn't the total solution to our problem. Gas sucking vehicles are the problem. All vehicles should be taxed on their MPG. No tax or wheel tax on vehicles that get over 35 mpg. and a huge tax on vehicles that get under 20 mpg and then pro-rate it. Of course, this will never happen unless we can get rid of the politicians that are in the pocket of the oil and auto companies. Of course, we can wait for $6+ gallon of gas and that will kind of take care of the gas guzzlers. "

Jack wrote on December 3, 2007 8:55 pm:
" I think its time we started drilling oil wells in Alaska and off the coasts and tell chaviz to take his oil and shove it may have to tell a few liberals also. Corn flakes and our food supply is being controlled be a few environmentalists that would like to break the USA "

Reply to DBM wrote on December 4, 2007 5:16 am:
" Nice oversimple idea. How do you tax the 7 mpg transport trucks? What about the 20 gallon per hour farm tractors? How about the industrial size lawn mowers at the golf course? Taxation is not the end all to any problem. If it were, each tax law would only need to last a few months until the perceived problem is fixed. Our entire economy will change with higher priced fuel. So is that bad or is it just change? So far I have not noticed any change in the driving habits of people who have become acccustomed to $1 gasoline. When gasoline becomes cost prohibitive we will know and a government solution may not be the best answer. Government solutions always involve higher taxes just as does the ethanol industry subsidies. That experiment is still in motion. "

Hjalmer wrote on December 4, 2007 5:36 am:
" This plant's problems are all about poor quality construction and it says nothing about the viability of ethanol. They never got this plant running the way it was designed. They had motors wired backward and welds breaking all the time. The closed loop system remains a sound concept, but someone dropped the ball in the construction phase. "

WCG wrote on December 4, 2007 7:26 am:
" Heh, heh. Jack, in what fantasy land are you living? Oil is a finite resource. More drilling in the U.S. isn't going to help anything when we're running out of oil, and it sure as heck isn't going to help with global warming. Believing in a fantasy world won't help us now. We need rational answers to real-world problems, and it's not going to be easy. We must put together a broad-based, scientific, multifaceted approach to address energy security AND climate change, including conservation, solar, wind, tidal, biological, and nuclear. And I hate to break it to enthusiasts, but some of these (like wind-generated power, for example) aren't ever going to be major contributers to our energy supplies. But in a broad-based solution, every little bit helps. Ethanol could help a bit, too, if we can figure out how to get more energy out of it than we put in. "

taxpayer1 wrote on December 4, 2007 7:51 am:
" Hey Scott: Warren Buffet is in energy. He owns Northern Natural Gas and Mid American Energy. "

over 60 wrote on December 4, 2007 8:42 am:
" They only got into it for the subsidys. I didn't expect anything less than what happened. Expect more of the same as the government gets new members who haven't gotten lobbiest money. Don't want to say I told you so, but. "

Jim wrote on December 4, 2007 9:04 am:
" To Joe, there are already regulations on the size and type of confinments in Nebraska, has been for several years. The failure of this plant was totally managment, nothing more nothing less. I personally knew one of the guys that was involved and it comes as no surprise to me or a lot of people in the Mead area that this happend, knowing the past of one of the priciples involved with this plant. Under good management this plant would be a great sucess in Nebraska. "

J wrote on December 4, 2007 9:22 am:
" once again Art Hovey proves that one can indeed extract opinion by writing the "facts". Its too bad he couldn't focus on what this really was - poor management - rather than playing up to the poo-pooers of the world by once again attacking ethanol, corn, cattle, and Nebraska. "

Bubba wrote on December 4, 2007 1:26 pm:
" When management insists on doing it the cheapest way and not the best way this is what happens. You got what you paid for Mr. Langley. "

easy wrote on December 4, 2007 1:54 pm:
" We increase the subsidizing of this product(currently 50 some cents a gallon), we mandate it more (currently all state vehicles "must" use ethanol), and we increase the tariffs on imported ethanol (currently 50 some cents a gallon). And then this wonderful product "may" be viable. Just ask the Corn Growers Association. "

Local Farmer wrote on December 5, 2007 10:32 am:
" Ethanol is good for the economy. It increases grain prices, farmers then purchase more products,which helps the economy overall. Plus it gives options so we are not totally reliable on oil companies and thier resources. This plant was mismanaged financially. E3 owes many local farmers and contractors, us included for corn hauled in and our son who is a first year farmer. Mead Cattle received the by-product from the corn, which they paid E3 for. Same owner, but seperate entities. I am sure Langley is still receiving his salary and paying all of his personal bills. He is leaving the local community holding the bag. "

sdy wrote on April 4, 2008 8:45 pm:
" hey---is there an energy problem-----let it all come home to roost; no jobs; no money; no problem with even concerning ourselves with energy concerns----let the damn government pay our ways----we've supported those morons for way too many years----time their free ride comes to an end---then we can start all over again without them; just have to complete the cycle. "