Now
Fair
31°
High
34°
Low
11°

LPS sees jump in free lunch participants

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MARGARET REIST / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, Nov 24, 2007 - 06:58:18 pm CST

The number of Lincoln Public Schools students participating in the free- and reduced-price lunch program spiked this year by nearly 22 percent.

The federal lunch program is the main tool school districts use to gauge students living in poverty.

This year, 12,760 students kindergarten-12th grade are participating, compared to 10,492 last year, according to Aaron Babcock, LPS communications specialist.

Story Photo
(LJS File)

That means 38 percent of LPS students are participating, compared to 32.9 percent last year. That’s a significantly higher jump than the previous six years.

The reason for the increase ” more than three times last year’s increase ” is unclear.

There’s been no change in the way eligibility is determined by the federal government, said Connie Stefkovich, administrator of nutrition services with the state Department of Education.

Every year, the guidelines are set based on federal poverty levels. This year, children are eligible for free lunch if their family income is 130 percent of the poverty line; students get lunch at a reduced price if their family income is 185 percent of the poverty line.

According to the Feb. 27, 2007, Federal Register, a family of three qualifies for free lunches if its annual income is no more than $22,321. A family of three qualifies for reduced-price lunches if its annual income is no more than $31,765.

Full-cost lunch for a Lincoln grade school pupil is $1.90. The reduced-price lunch cost is 90 cents.

School officials and those who work with low-income families say the increase in participation is likely a reflection of a struggling economy.

“We’ve been hearing a lot from the schools,” said Scott Young,  executive director of the Lincoln Food Bank.

This year,  738 elementary school children participate in the Food Bank/LPS Backpack Program, which provides food for children and families who might otherwise go hungry during the weekend. The students come from 14 public and private schools in Lincoln, Seward and Milford.

The need always exceeds the backpacks and so it’s hard to gauge how the increase in free- and reduced-price lunch numbers plays out, Young said.

“We fall short in all of our public schools,” Young said. “We’re not even coming close.”

Marilyn Moore, LPS associate superintendent of instruction, said she hadn’t seen the numbers but speculated that the economy is to blame for the increase.

“I would speculate that the economic downturn in some segments of the community might have affected it,” she said.

The LPS student population increased just a little over 1 percent this year, she said. And while the kindergarten class is large, it’s just 100 kids more than last year’s kindergarten enrollment.

The percentage of students who participate in the free- and reduced-price lunch program tends to decrease as students get older. Last year, the largest percentages were in first and second grades.

Young said the federal lunch program numbers are often used to support some economists’ theory that the lower end of the middle class is slipping into poverty.

“I would say there’s nothing unique to Lincoln,” he said. “Food prices have suddenly spiked, fuel prices are killing people.”

A study last year by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities  showed that the percentage of national income that went to wages and salaries in the first half of the year was at the lowest level since 1929. In contrast, the percentage that went to corporate profits was at its highest level since 1950.

The 25-year-old center works at federal and state levels on policies and programs that affect low- and moderate-income persons.

Elliott Elementary Principal  De Ann Currin said free- and reduced-price lunch numbers at her school went up slightly but not significantly. The percentage of students at Elliott who participate in the food program has hovered between about 85 and 90 percent for a number of years, she said.

Currin said many families at Elliott struggle to meet basic needs: food, clothing, gas, transportation and paying utilities.

Holidays are a particularly tough time, she said, because students often don’t know exactly what that time away from school will hold for them, Currin said.

But the community always responds, at the holidays but other times, too, she said.

“This community is so loving that when we have a need we can say it and someone will respond,” she said.

Reach Margaret Reist at 473-7226 or mreist@journalstar.com


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Living it! wrote on November 24, 2007 1:44 am:
" I think it just shows people are getting more and more desperate. Not everyone who qualifies for a program will utilize that service for one reason or another. We have qualified for free lunches for years, however have never taken advantage of it. I always felt there were others out there in worse shape than us and we should not waste the money allocated for this program by using it just because we qualify if we felt there was a way around it. Instead my kids have always taken cold lunch or we have cut back in other areas so that they had lunch money, however, with everything rising beyond belief except wages, we have no where left to cut back in our budget and therefore no choice but to take advantage of what we are otherwise entitled to. However I still feel bad as I know there are some children in this city that this is the only meal they get all day. Unlike my children who will come home to a supper and probably a bedtime snack. For those in need of food outside of school, there is a program here called Food Net, Inc. that has 25 different sites in and around Lincoln 7 days a week. No income qualifications. Just show up and you can receive whatever they have. You can visit their website at www.foodnetlincoln.org or call them at 416-6197 for a list of sites and times. Their motto is "No one in Lincoln, NE should go hungry" and they mean it. "

RB wrote on November 24, 2007 1:47 am:
" Does anyone have a problem with that photo? No wonder our kids are fat. No wonder people grow-up and grow-wide. SAD that we are feeding kids junk. Shame Shame Shame. "

Darrin wrote on November 24, 2007 2:06 am:
" Excellent article. Well researched and backed by facts while incorporating the human factor. "

Dee wrote on November 24, 2007 9:45 am:
" Of course there has been a jump. Jobs are leaving, heating and cooling costs are increasing, food is increasing, benefits are being cut. Why are we surprised? "

Cole wrote on November 24, 2007 9:52 am:
" We should all do whatever we can to make sure all of our citizens' basic needs are met. It's the moral thing to do. But if you have a child (which is understandable) and receive any kind of social assistance and then you have another child (which is intolerable) - why did this happen? Apathy? Ignorance? Religion? Condoms prevent pregnancy. Condoms prevent pregnancy. Condoms prevent pregnancy. If your culture or religion prevents you from the simple use of a condom, please ask your cleric for food and give the school a break. Think about it - when you see three kids at the mall, chances are good that you are buying lunch and quite possibly breakfast for one of them every day. Right here in Lincoln. Currin and other saints like her probably spend most of their day worrying about the hunger, health care and emotional well-being of her students while the rest of us are on her case about meeting math and reading requirements for "No Child Left Behind". If we're already providing food for 90% of her students, I guess the next logical step is to start building housing units right on the playground - no condoms, though (that would be immoral). Condoms prevent pregnancy. Did I mention that condoms prevent pregnancy? "

Ks wrote on November 24, 2007 10:00 am:
" Dee took the words right out of my mouth.Is anyone really surprised?It's going to get worse and worse if we "Stay the course".the whole country,not just the war. "

ya but wrote on November 24, 2007 2:34 pm:
" Didn't Holy Foley point out that the reporting of these numbers in Lincoln are VERY suspect? LPS, better make sure those numbers are correct before you increase our tax dollar going to the feds. "

Grant Money wrote on November 24, 2007 3:05 pm:
" LPS tries to sign up even the kids that don't qualify, because they turn a profit on the grant money. "

whatever wrote on November 24, 2007 3:45 pm:
" Lincoln is a magnet for the impoverished. Lincoln has also lost lot's of good paying jobs. It wouldn't surprise me at all if in 2 to 3 years 60 to 70 percent of LPS students are on free or reduced lunches. Look at the demographics of who is having babies, look at the demographics of Lincoln's refugee problem. Compassion and doing God's work are wonderful things, but when it destroys your own house and your ability to be compassionate then are you really doing God's work? And "Cole", your "condom crusade" is a little tiresome, simplistic and generally not well thought out. You make a lot of assumptions that aren't necessarily true. But that's the topic of a whole 'nother article. "

yup wrote on November 25, 2007 6:37 am:
" If they cannot afford lunch, their parents probably are on foodstamps. Why can't their parents send them with a sack lunch. I brought a sack lunch all my years of school, and not because my family was on foodstamps, because it was more economical. I think maybe a lesson in economics is in within reason here. "

you know who wrote on November 25, 2007 8:43 am:
" You can blame former president Reagan for the demise in school lunches it was one of the first things he did when in office lowered all standards on what could be served and set new ones on what could be substituted in place of a healthy nutritious lunch we are now seeing what his handy work did with the large number of young adults who are over weight and todays children in school now standards need to be improved to pre-Reagan era "

Mike White wrote on November 25, 2007 9:56 am:
" Two things come to my mind, first, our residents have lost a lot of employers and indeed are in need of help, the city of Lincoln seems to think this is o.k. as they have done nothing about it, just lip service as usual. Second, I was at a local middle school and observed that a large majority of these children are from a national melting pot of imigrants who's parents are probably illegle imigrants thus we are satarting to be like California with our sevices so clogged up that we can't take care of our own people. Starting with the Clinton administration the word has been, Oh, it's about the children and I agree somewhat as long as it's about our children first and not the worlds children. You bleeding hearts out there better take a long hard look and realize that you are giving away the very fiber of OUR childrens existance. I am sure glad it makes you sleep better at night. "

peb wrote on November 25, 2007 1:29 pm:
" I sleep better at night knowing ANY child is sleeping better because they are not hungry. "

Recession wrote on November 25, 2007 4:06 pm:
" Wait till the recession hits in earnest, Lincoln's resources will be stretched beyond belief and school lunches are the least to worry about. Don't buy the crap the media feeds you about the economy, or the absolute idiocy of the "core inflation" argument the government and these stupid economists feed you. The lower and lower middle classes are barely hanging on and there is only so much credit available. Next up it's the middle of the middle class and the upper middle class that will be feeling the pinch. "

mikes on the mark wrote on November 25, 2007 10:29 pm:
" stop supporting the world when children and adults need help here in the U.S. its time we take care of our own no nation is going to come to are aid when we need it bush has seen to that "