Now
Fair
74.0°
High
87°
Low
72°

Fortenberry shows independent streak

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 - 11:55:57 pm CST

Last week, Rep. Jeff Fortenberry voted to override President Bush’s veto of a major appropriations bill and supported the Democratic majority’s mortgage reform plan.

Not only did that separate him from most of his Republican colleagues, he also was a lone voice in Nebraska’s three-member House delegation.

Is the1st District representative becoming a more independent congressman?

Story Photo
Jeff Fortenberry

“I’ve always believed it’s my responsibility to use my best judgment and call it the way I see it,” Fortenberry said, but there’s also another factor in play here.

“When you’re in the majority party, you have an opportunity to effect legislation coming before Congress,” he said.

As a member of the minority, you need to “look at policy issues and goals” within the framework shaped by the majority, Fortenberry said.

And then you sometimes need to determine whether to “separate yourself (and) vote to move forward on key issues,” he said.

It’s a fact of life: Democrats seized control of the House, and its agenda, last November.

“It’s not about voting with President Bush or against Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi,” Fortenberry said, “but voting in the best interests of the country and Nebraska. That’s my responsibility.”

Although last week’s votes jumped out, there are other times he has departed from his Republican colleagues, Fortenberry noted during an interview in his Lincoln office.

A dozen examples reach back to January when he joined House Democrats in supporting the so-called Paygo budgeting rule, which requires any new spending to be financed without deficit funding.

Fortenberry, now in his second House term, parted company with a majority of his fellow Republicans in voting for a new farm bill in July.

In addition to voting last week to override the president’s veto of the appropriations bill for labor, education, and health and human services programs, he earlier voted to override a veto of energy and water development appropriations.

And, Fortenberry said, he expects to vote to override Bush’s anticipated veto of transportation and housing appropriations.

Those appropriations bills are “not perfect,” he said.  “But we need to move forward.”

The alternative, he said, is endless “quibbling and not dealing in an urgent manner with the most serious issues of the day.”

Last week’s appropriations bill contained important funding for cancer research, juvenile diabetes and education, Fortenberry said.

The transportation appropriations bill provides funding for urgently needed infrastructure improvements, he said.

The Democratic mortgage reform bill did not contain an amendment he had supported, Fortenberry said, but it “tightened up regulations on lending practices in a prudent way.”

In the end, he said, he must weigh all factors, including the imperative to move ahead.

“I have to press that button by myself,” he said.  “It’s yes or no.”

While the country wants action on major issues, Fortenberry said, Congress is gridlocked by maneuvers to seek partisan advantage.

“Issues are threaded politically with difficult choices in order to set up TV commercials,” he said. “But we need to get things done for the country.”

Fortenberry said he has signaled his willingness to reach across the aisle to Democrats so he can present his own ideas.

That has resulted in a place at the table in bipartisan negotiations  to broker some agreement on extension of the children’s health insurance program, he said.

“I support renewal and expansion of this important program,” Fortenberry said.

“But it needs to target the poorest and most vulnerable children first; serve primarily children; and not overrreach to people who don’t need it.”

Fortenberry said he’s a member of “the Republican team” because of philosophical agreement, but has found there is a respect for independent judgment within the House and among his Nebraska constituents.

Although he departed from his Nebraska colleagues, Reps. Lee Terry and Adrian Smith, on last week’s appropriations and mortgage reform votes, Fortenberry said, they kept one another informed.

“It’s important for me to know where they are,” he said. “I don’t like surprises; they don’t like surprises.  We have a respectful working relationship.”

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Nate wrote on November 23, 2007 2:06 am:
" Woah. Is it April 1st again? "

McNeil wrote on November 23, 2007 2:29 am:
" Good. I was hoping to see this from Fortenberry. I wish more elected officials were more interested in getting things done for the people than scoring political points. "

Good Job wrote on November 23, 2007 5:46 am:
" Good job, Congressman Fortenberry, for thinking outside the box and doing what is right. Compassion for people, while being fiscally responsibile, shows the character of our Congressman. Thank you! "

WCG wrote on November 23, 2007 6:50 am:
" Oh, please! Fortenberry has been a staunch supporter of the worst president in U.S. history, rarely showing any independence. Where was he when the Republicans controlled Congress, when their "culture of corruption" ran everything in Washington? Now that Bush's approval ratings are in the tank he might feel brave enough to vote with the Democrats on occasion, but that's hardly an "independent streak." Where was Fortenberry when Bush attacked an innocent country? Why didn't he stand up against Bush's borrow-and-spend fiscal policies, record budget deficits, torture of prisoners, head-in-the-sand approach to global warming, domestic spying, elimination of habeas corpus, politicization of the Justice Department, and attacks on our fundamental American principles, such as the rule of law, the separation of powers, and the separation of church and state? Where was his "independent streak" then? "

Edgar Pearlstein wrote on November 23, 2007 8:19 am:
" How many of these votes were really for pork-barrel expenditures for Fortenberry's district? Such expenditures are often embedded in larger bills, such as the ones mentioned. Pork is something a congress person can brag about in the next election, but in order to get it, he has to vote for similar spending in many of the other 435 congessional districts. "

whatever wrote on November 23, 2007 8:46 am:
" The jury is still out on Fortenberry, but he is a whole lot better than Smith or Terry. "

hhhhmmmmm wrote on November 23, 2007 8:54 am:
" Interesting that he's stepping outside Republican boundaries. However I think the bigger question is: will he ever step away from the control of the bishop of the Lincoln diocese? "

McNeil wrote on November 23, 2007 9:28 am:
" Good. I was hoping to see this from Rep. Fortenberry. I wish more elected officials were more concerned about gettings things done for the people than scoring political points. "

Whatever wrote on November 23, 2007 10:58 am:
" Must be time for reelection, thus the reason he’s pandering for votes. "

Political Moves wrote on November 23, 2007 12:01 pm:
" He is not an indendent, he is a republican to the bone. He knows that if he moves to the center just a bit. He will never leave office. He'll win the R's with ease, and will take enough I's and right-leaning D's to put hime in office for the next Politically, it's smart. As a Democrat...that sucks! "

SD wrote on November 23, 2007 3:29 pm:
" Great Jeff, that oath of party loyalty is wearing thin. There is a need to more independent, than a party hack. Hope to see more. "

Land of Bryan wrote on November 23, 2007 10:19 pm:
" Nebraska is a conservative, yet independent-minded and populist state. Fortenberry's congressional district is most representative of this, as it includes a mix of rural and urban, ag and manufacturing, small business and government. Like Bereuter before him, Fortenberry is doing what good leaders do: representing the will of the people who elected them. "

Greg wrote on November 24, 2007 6:29 am:
" Who does Representative Fortenberry think he's kidding. We all know what rodents do when a ship begins to sink. During his whole career he has marched in lockstep with the administration and thus must bear a share of the responsibility for their disastrous policies, his recent "independence" notwithstanding. This cynical attempt to distance himself from the administration policies he has vigorously supported is an insult to the voters and indicates the small regard he has for their intelligence. "

Dave K wrote on November 24, 2007 1:31 pm:
" Haha ... let me get this right. Fortenberry votes with the Republicans and he's a conservative hack. He votes with the Democrats and he's 'thinking outside the box'? I love this stuff. "

Legislature Coverage