Now
Rain Fog/Mist
52°
High
63°
Low
41°

NRDs turn to bonds to ease Republican River water woes

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY ART HOVEY / Lincoln Journal Star

Sunday, Sep 30, 2007 - 12:19:45 am CDT

In south-central and southwestern Nebraska, where water might already be as precious as oil, the guardians of groundwater are trying something new to secure their future.

Through bond sales to investors that will be announced next month, people as far removed from the Republican River Valley as a dentist from Illinois or a software executive from Massachusetts could soon be involved in financing leases and purchases of Nebraska water rights.

A new state law allows natural resources districts based at Imperial, Curtis and Alma to turn to Ameritas in Lincoln to put together a $9.7 million bond package for that purpose.

Story Photo
Three states - Colorado, Nebraska and Kansas - claim rights to water in the Republican River. (LJS file)

The ultimate objective is to keep enough water in the Republican to meet the terms of a river compact agreement with Kansas and to keep that state’s finger off the lawsuit button.

Using bonds to acquire rights to river flows that would otherwise be routed to irrigators in 2008 and beyond is one way to get that done. The opportunity is there only for the Republican River Basin and not for the state’s 20 other NRDs.

“I think some of these more creative solutions are going to be necessary to comply with some of the state’s agreements on water,” said Jasper Fanning, general manager of the Upper Republican NRD at Imperial.

Although the bond pay-off period is set up over four years, the local groundwater groups hope to wipe out their debt in a single year. The money would come from a combination of property taxes and a new occupation tax of up to $10 per acre that owners of irrigated land must pay.

That way, they can shave off much of the expected interest cost of about $1 million.

The bonds will show up on the property tax bills of all NRD residents, not just irrigators. Next door in the Middle Republican, for example, the cost will amount to about $47 for the owner of a $100,000 home.

Fanning acknowledged a new type of tax burden for people outside agriculture, but he said he’s hearing few complaints.

“We’ve heard some, but I think most of the folks out here realize that, in our area, without irrigation, they’d be subject to moving and finding a job elsewhere.

“I can’t think of a job that’s not related to or fully supported by agriculture.“

Annie Longan, mayor of Imperial, couldn’t find much room to disagree. Residents there don’t see the water situation as a problem that agriculture created and agriculture should solve, she said.

“I don’t think we have that mentality at all. We know how much our agriculture, our farmers, how much they contribute to our city. And I don’t think there’s anybody in town that feels in any way that if they have to pay a small tax — no, I don’t think we have that.“

Dean Edson, based in Lincoln as executive director for the Nebraska Association of Resources Districts, is among those endorsing a plan for more purchases of surface water to appease Kansas.

It should be noted that the state of Nebraska bought water from irrigation districts for the same purpose in 2006 and 2007.

“That’s the quickest way to get water in the river,” Edson said. “Buy water that’s already there.“

Mike Jess, associate director of the Water Center at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, is more skeptical about a strategy that involves going into debt to pay for water on a a regular basis.

“The household I grew up in, you borrowed money to acquire things on a permanent basis,” Jess said.

He recalled turning the bond-lease pairing into a recent question for students in one of his classes at UNL: “Who here is borrowing money to pay your rent?“

A forest of hands did not immediately shoot up.

Jess suggested a different and longer-lasting approach that has already been used for the Sherman Reservoir in central Nebraska by the Farwell Irrigation District: Buy the dams and other parts of the Republican’s irrigation assets from the federal Bureau of Reclamation.

“It would take a lot of coordination and effort by the NRDs to directly acquire those assets,” he said, “but it’s certainly not impossible.“

No matter how matters are resolved, it seems apparent that many local boards that manage groundwater use in Nebraska are encountering new and substantial financial obligations as they try to balance irrigation with other water priorities.

The leadership of the Central Platte NRD in Grand Island, for example, recently approved the largest one-year budget increase in its history.

Among the financial pressures behind that move is the state’s determination that the Central Platte is over-appropriated, that it has more demands for water than it has supply.

Lurking in the background are a cooperative agreement for managing the river with Colorado and Wyoming and the related need to keep enough water in the Platte to support threatened and endangered species.

The new budget for the Central Platte will increase the annual tax bill for the owner of a $100,000 home from $32 to $58, said NRD Manager Ron Bishop.

“Part of that is the water bank we needed to offset depletions to the river that resulted from it being over-appropriated in the western part of the natural resources district,” Bishop said.

Reach Art Hovey at (402) 523-4949 or ahovey@alltel.net


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Nebraska > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Overtaxed wrote on September 30, 2007 8:09 am:
" NRD taxing authority should be eliminated. Why should I have to pay for someone elses greedy use of water? "

J wrote on September 30, 2007 9:53 am:
" because the beneficial use of that water has both fed you and kept your taxes lower by further creating jobs and myriad of products that you use everyday. Unless of course you live a completely independent, "sustainable" lifestyle. "

F ree Ride on non-irrigators wrote on September 30, 2007 10:01 am:
" Taxing the aveage citizen and dryland property who have no ties/use of water ??? I know most people do not relize what the local NRD board is doing to them this year or later when what if it goes like this 2007 water tax bond is 10 million, 25 million in 2008 in a dry year 100 million in 2010 after several dry years again and later... Kansas is liking this bond payment plan.. All home owners should fight this tax on their homes to the end..... I never seen a farmer yet pay local sales tax on tractors/ equipment purchases because they complained and got them off the local sales tax roles ....fair is fair right and with 4 corn 10 beans and 9.50 wheat irrigated farmers pay your own bills not us retired non ag citizens to bail you out again........ "

Yeah Right wrote on September 30, 2007 10:10 am:
" You knew this was coming. The government in Nebraska does not know of a single way to bring in money except tax. Now we all have to pay for the states screwup. We seem to also be bailing out the farmers again. Farming has taken this water,let them pay to get the lawsuit settled. The average taxpayers have had nothing to do with this usage. I am from the republican valley and know I don't water or have a car wash or anything else to drain the river or underground water. Overtaxed is right. "

MJ wrote on September 30, 2007 11:13 am:
" Where is the outrage that irrigators have to pay proportionally less when the are the cause of all these problems. They shouldn't be growing corn, a high water use crop, in a semiarid region of the state. It seems to me that the fairest approach would be to put an across the board tax on all water consumption. Those who use the most water pay the highest taxes. The self-interested irrigator-dominated NRD boards would never let that happen. It's time for the people (represented by the state) to take back control of our water resources. "

RH wrote on September 30, 2007 4:42 pm:
" It is amusing to see these simplistic views on issues obviously not understood. There are valid concerns on policy in relation to water use. J touched on the beneficial use of water. Farmers have complied with the laws concerning water and beneficial use. They also pay taxes. The property tax load on 1500 acres could easily be $45000/year, not to mention income, self employment, and personal property tax on equipment(you cannot complain and remove personal property--you pay this instead of sales tax-every year). The property and personal property tax is paid, even with losses. How many of those posting are paying a $45000 tax bill before they earn any income? The issues are not as simple as you would like to make them. "

Joyce wrote on September 30, 2007 6:33 pm:
" To all of you who have complained here, not one of you knows what you are talking about. Ok, the tax goes through, better be looking for a second and third job to be able to put food on the table. Thank you J for helping saying it like it is. "

zip wrote on October 1, 2007 9:23 am:
" Ok you may pay 45,000 in property taxes. How much do you receive in subsidys? How much do you write off from this property? How much do you pay in income tax? It's pretty common knowledge that the USDA has pretty hefty handouts. Compare these subsidys to someone self employed doing other kinds of business. There is no comparison. If I don't have a profit. I just don't have a profit. I don't get or expect the government to come in and get me up on my feet. I pay taxes on personal property, real property, sales, social security, earnings and everything else possible in nebraska. I don't need to help you with your water bills. "