Now
Fair
52°
High
51°
Low
29°

Letters, 9/24: Give land to university

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Monday, Sep 24, 2007 - 12:23:55 am CDT

I am a senior citizen who has spent many happy hours at the State Fair. My parents went to the State Fair before they had a car, traveling by train.

I can’t imagine the State Fair being held anywhere else, but maybe it’s time to hold it out west somewhere, so the rest of the state has closer access to it for the next 140 years!

But more importantly, we need to give that space to the university. After all, what is more important — a 10-day fair or a year-round educational area for the people of our state?

Let the university have the fairgrounds!

Ruth Anne Schoen, Wahoo

Send $94M elsewhere

The heading caught my eye, “Build new jail with eye to the future” (editorial, LJS, Sept. 5). I could not help but think, what if we as a community really did think for the future.

The new jail is estimated at $94 million. What if we spent $94 million on building a better future by supporting new and existing programs in the community that empower “at-risk” kids when they are young, such as mentoring programs, after school programs, health programs, life skills programs, community gardens, etc.

Think of the child in your child’s/grandchild’s class that is labeled the “troublemaker.” Instead of labeling him/her and expecting him/her to end up in jail, why not expect the best? Every “at-risk” person has a skill that can contribute to the community.

As a community in Lincoln we could live this famous proverb, give a man a fish and he can eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he can eat for a lifetime!

There are already organizations out there doing this; more funding would allow them to reach more people. If the $94 million was spent on prevention, the future of Lincoln would mean more thoughtful citizens, not more people going to bigger jails.

The editorial began, “there’s no escaping the fact that Lancaster County has to do it,” and ends, “With planning, the new jail can meet the needs of our growing community for a much longer period.”

What if “it” meant creating more opportunities for children to learn and feel hope from the community and ended with us honestly meeting the needs of all people in the community? Every citizen has the power to create the future of our community, What will we choose? 

Summer Brackhan, Lincoln

Ashamed of news media

As I followed Gen. David Petraeus’ report to Congress recently and the absurdly insulting and despicable questioning he received from Democratic leaders, I am ashamed.

I am ashamed that the Los Angeles Times opined that the report “would actually be written by the White House, with inputs from officials throughout the government,” when Petraeus himself stated, under oath, “I wrote this testimony myself” and that it “has not been cleared by, nor shared with, anyone in the Pentagon, the White House or Congress.”

I am ashamed that the mainstream media has continually been advocating against America in this war. The New York Times accepted a full-page ad from the ultra-left-wing MoveOn.Org group asking if he was “General Petraeus or General Betray Us?” and accusing him of intentionally falsifying his report. I am not surprised that the New York Times ran that ad at a 61 percent discount, further destroying any hint of impartiality from that paper.

I am ashamed that, immediately after Petraeus gave his report, on CNN, they immediately challenged each point of his report, live, with a reporter in Iraq.

I am ashamed that on MSNBC, Chris Matthews repeatedly referred to Petraeus’ report as a “dog and pony show.”

This makes four major news organizations openly and unabashedly siding with the Democratic left and advocating for America to lose this war.

I am not “pro-war.” No one wants war or likes war. I support our current military action in Iraq and elsewhere around the globe, and I want them to overwhelmingly succeed.

I cannot fathom why any American would want us to lose this war, and yet nearly every major news organization in the country and more than half of our Congress members are advocating for that very thing.

I am ashamed.

Andy Ringsmuth, Lincoln

U.S. not always to blame

Change the title and the signature on a Sept. 17 letter and see if it seems quite logical. Change the title from “Why Iraqis hate the U.S.” to “Why radical Islamic terrorists hate the U.S.” Then change the signature from “Mohammed H. Siddiq” to “Osama bin Laden.”

Only the twisted minds of radicals could logically blame the U.S. for the things we are said to have caused in this letter. For instance, we are blamed for killing 1.5 million Iraqis because Saddam’s noncompliance with United Nations agreements led to the UN putting his country on economic sanctions.

Have our actions in Iraq been entirely just and honorable? I don’t believe they have. However, none of our actions here could be used by right-thinking people to justify the 9/11 terrorism.

Mike Stoakes, Lincoln

Chambers suit ridiculous

When I opened the paper and saw that Ernie Chambers was suing God, I had to take a double take.

Remember, this is the man who skips morning prayers during session and criticizes Christians. I am very thankful to live in a nation that allows us freedom of religion and of free speech. Therefore, I think I will use my freedom of speech to spew my venom towards Mr. Chambers.

He said that he is doing this to prove a point, that point being you can sue anyone, any time, over anything, referring to the Tory Bowen case who is suing the judge for not letting certain words be used in her rape trial.

Chambers stated that God has made terroristic threats against himself and his constituents, among other allegations.

I find this blasphemes and feel that Ernie Chambers must be sniffing a few too many gas fumes when fixing his vehicles.

The more I think about this, the more I think maybe I should file a lawsuit against Chambers. Let’s see, maybe for having to read such garbage, for mental anguish, but most of all, for defamation of character, not mine, but God’s. Remember, you can sue anyone, any time, over anything.

Nancy J. Wissink, Lincoln

South Lincoln uninviting

It is funny to watch the velvet glove of real estate and its twisted sense of values enter our City Council meetings. Unless you are disabled, then it isn’t so funny.

Several years ago St. Monica’s wanted to build a treatment center for alcoholic women in the sacred land of South Lincoln. Didn’t see the light of day.

Then a lawsuit from Developmental Services of Nebraska forced the City Council to give consideration for zoning to group homes and such for people with special needs. The lawsuit cost taxpayers a lot of money.

Now, AgeMark wants to build a treatment center for Alzheimer’s patients in the sacred land of South Lincoln. Fight tooth and nail, they get it approved over howls of disapproval from the neighbors whose traffic and noise concerns seem moot given the nearby Old Cheney Road.

The whole message of welcoming people with special needs in the “community" seems to define “community” as property that is too devalued to matter. South Lincoln is sending a clear message. If alcoholic women and Alzheimer’s patients are threatening to the sacred soil of South Lincoln, then how much more the fight will be over anyone else. I wouldn’t give stray kittens much hope.

We would be wise to consider that perhaps nice neighborhoods are the best environment for people with special needs. And changing our twisted obsession with property values wouldn’t hurt either.

Daniel Widders, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
JAIL..... wrote on September 24, 2007 4:58 am:
" All you have to do is look at the past. When the "OLD" jail was located in the basement of the current county/city building it was overcrowded as soon as it was built. Then they said that this "NEW" jail would provide PLENTY of room WELL INTO the 21st century. Much to their chagrin, it too was overcrowded as soon as it was built. I see this happening time an time again. WHEN ((NOT IF)) the new jail is built, it too, will be overcrowded as soon as it is built. And there will be people who will complain about the transportation costs of moving prisoners to and from jail. THEN there will be talk of building a NEW courthouse CLOSER due to costs. It's a rather bad cycle, but just wait and see.....it WILL happen. "

I think I understand.... wrote on September 24, 2007 8:18 am:
" Andy, I think I understand. Your frustrated because your view of the war was once the mainstream and now your view of the war is the minority. Quick question I have yet to hear anyone respond to. If Blackwater gets kicked out of Iraq because they opened fire and killed innocent civilians and that creates a vacuum or a shortage of security in the green zone, did the surge actually work? Lets not forget the whole point was to stabilize enough regions in order to achieve political reconciliation. If that can't happen and if that didn't happen, wasn't this whole thing an "dog and pony show?" "

dtw wrote on September 24, 2007 8:27 am:
" Andy, you claim to not be "pro-war" yet you state that we cannot "lose this war". You might want to look up hypocrisy in the dictionary. By the way CNN and MSNBC did a fantastic job covering the general. "

Ryan wrote on September 24, 2007 8:29 am:
" When you defame Zeus by claiming that he does not exist, I am offended at that blasphemy and I intend to countersue for mental anguish. Should I? What gives your god more credence? When you claim that I will burn in hell for all eternity because I'm supposedly a sinner, that's a lot of stress and I should be able to launch a huge suit against all christians, right? You know what? This is America. Chambers has a right to do whatever he wants. You'll get over it. "

josh wrote on September 24, 2007 8:50 am:
" I wonder if Andy Ringsmuth is equally ashamed of the Republicns for blinding following the neo-cons and for getting us into this never-ending quagmire in the first place. "

Jody P. wrote on September 24, 2007 8:57 am:
" Regarding Mr. Ringsmuth's letter, the LA Times did not "opine" that the White House would write the report. They REPORTED that unnamed administration officials said that the "Petraeus Report" would be written by the WH. We got into this mess because the WH fed us cherry-picked intelligence which the MSM largely supported with no questions asked. If we haven't learned by now that we need to take a hard look at whatever the administration reports to us as facts, it would probably meet the clinicial definition of "stupid". "

JT wrote on September 24, 2007 9:00 am:
" Mr. Ringsmuth, I think we're far past the point of taking administration claims at face value. As for the Move On Ad, you do realize that it was an ad in a newspaper right? It wasn't Blackwater murdering people, or starting a war on bogus claims. I trust you were even more upset by the Swift Boat ads disparaging Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 election. PS Move On has sent $77K to the NYT to make up for the full amount of the ad. "

Sensitive about War? wrote on September 24, 2007 9:15 am:
" Andy, why are you ashamed of media asking appropriate questions? Maybe if these questions had been asked prior to the war, we wouldn't be in the current mess of Iraq. They have every right to debunk the misinformation of Petraeus. The right wingers are being real babies about this issue. They are complaining about the way people are talking about the war when the focus should be ON THE WAR. "

osisbs wrote on September 24, 2007 9:26 am:
" I'm enraged that Ernie Chambers would sue God. I also do not understand irony, wit, allegory, euphamism, or sarcasm. I am an idiot. "

to Andy wrote on September 24, 2007 9:29 am:
" Unfortunately, your arguments are way off base. First of all, there were TWO reports to congress. One was drafted by the White House (as required by Congress) and delivered on September 15th in writing. The other was General Petraeus' testimony. You are mixing the two up. second, where is it written that the news media cannot challenge a statement made by Petraeus or any other public figure? He is not God - the media and congress have a responsibility to challenge him to exercise oversight. Blind obediance to the military is the first step to a government and country like Hussein's Iraq. Is that really what you want for America? "

Realist wrote on September 24, 2007 9:43 am:
" Why aren't they building a drag strip in "sacred" north Lincoln? How come the motor cycle track won't be built in west or north Lincoln? Why aren't they building a new Wal-Mart in east Lincoln? Please, Daniel Widders, south Lincoln is no different then any other part of Lincoln. Just like north, east, and west Lincoln, nobody in south Lincoln wants a commercial property built in their front yard. YOU put us on a pedistal, not those of us who live here. Do some research next time, before you make a fool of yourself again. "

American First wrote on September 24, 2007 10:47 am:
" Like Andy, I am ashamed with the treatment General P. received at the hands of Congress and ultimately through MoveOn.org, who gives the Democratic members of Congress their talking points. It's fine to question but to personally attack the integrity of a Four Star General? There is no respect left in this country for anything or anyone. I invite everyone to check out Moveon.org and their major contributor, George Soros and see what they are really all about. It's not the direction I want my country to go. I don't agree with everything the Bush Administration does but we must remember that we are all Americans first and when America loses we all lose. It's not "neo-cons" who have this opinion, most average Americans feel this way. We need to ignore the extremes on both sides or the political spectrum and work together to win this war with Islamic terrorists which was brought to our country on 9-11 or we will lose our nation! Wake up people! "

Marky Mark wrote on September 24, 2007 11:00 am:
" Dittos to MoveOn.Org for daring to question Big Brother. General Patreaus has been on camera numerous times since 2004 telling us that "We are making great strides", "The Insurgencies are in it's last throes", "blah," "blan," etc., etc. The good General's first loyalty is to his Commander in Chief, George W. Bush. Is there any doubts for concern on what he says? You remember Colonel Ollie North pleading the 5th amendment over and over again to protect his Commander in Chief don't you? "

Golden Calf wrote on September 24, 2007 11:03 am:
" Religion was invented by scoundrels a long long time ago in order to make money in a good capitalist society designed to prey on those that are too afraid to die and need to believe in the ever after. Period. "

Fred Register wrote on September 24, 2007 11:23 am:
" Boy this sounds familiar. Faux (news?) outrage over the possibility that ANYONE could doubt the veracity of a popular general, and accusations of treason against anyone who dared to let those pesky facts get in the way. The last time a large segment of the American media and public were gullible enough to take a general's words as unquestionable truth it was about yellowcake and Niger. Thousands of American and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives, and at least a trillion dollars later, all but the most clueless recognize that was complete and utter bovine byproduct. Now, after Bush has had to fire the last several generals who actually started telling a little bit of the truth until he found this guy next on his list, we are supposed to fall for the same hooey about generals always telling the truth and not being swayed by political taskmasters? Is this a demonstration of an absurdly short attention span or an even more absurd level of credulity? "

to Markymark wrote on September 24, 2007 11:36 am:
" ya need to go back to Civics class one can only plead the 5th to save their own sorry behind. "

Theresa wrote on September 24, 2007 12:14 pm:
" Summer, I think that's a great idea. I would really like to see Lincoln make that step from being reactive to proactive. "

Utopia wrote on September 24, 2007 12:16 pm:
" Let's use the 94 million to pay people not to commit crimes then we won't need a new jail. It doesn't matter how you use the money Summer, there is still going to be a need for a jail unless you can guarantee that your money wasting program can stop 100% of the crime. "

To America First wrote on September 24, 2007 12:17 pm:
" I wonder if you were as outraged when the Republicans trahsed Max Cleland (an honored vet who lost limbs in the service of his country) and when they trashed John Kerry with the Swiftboat garbage. How soon they forget...... "

Nina wrote on September 24, 2007 12:19 pm:
" Ruth's suggestion gives new meaning to UNL being a "land grant university." I say keep the state fair where it is - the University can take over plenty of other areas better suited to its desires, such as so-called 'blighted' areas. UNL and the city of Lincoln both could insure they will make much money by allowing the sacred Devaney Center to be used for state BB and VB tourneys. Keep the big crowds coming to town, and keep the Qwest's hungry eyes at bay. If UNL has its way, the state fair plus all the tourneys will go elsewhere. "

An Answer wrote on September 24, 2007 12:19 pm:
" Since you asked...The motorcycle track proposed for southwest of Lincoln would have been directly across the road from an environmentally sensitive area - a nature preserve. There was a valid concern especially since the center offers year-round educational programs and many outdoor activities focusing on the unique area. Just not a suitable "mix" with dirtbikes racing across the road. Another site for the track is located in NE Lincoln. "

FSG wrote on September 24, 2007 12:43 pm:
" Yeah, let us never attack the integrity of a Four Star General. Unless they happen to be one of the many retired who have also said the war is a mess and failure. Hannity had plenty of awful things to say about them. But loved it when a general spoke out against Clinton policy. But most importantly for Andy he should seek the young turk web site with all the quotes by the right totally contrary to what they're saying now. Hypocrits every last one of them. "

peb wrote on September 24, 2007 12:49 pm:
" Where was the shame when a certain other party was shaming a man who gave an arm and two legs for this country? "

Ripper wrote on September 24, 2007 1:11 pm:
" Chambers suing God is so funny-he is an atheist which in turn means he does not believe in a God. Yet he sues God which is counter to his atheistic stance. If there is a God, then he/she must find it pretty funny that even old Ernie Chambers finally admits to it. Even funnier God responded to the suit-you just have to love this type of stuff. "

Daniel...... wrote on September 24, 2007 1:14 pm:
" If you believe an alcoholic is disabled then you must be mentally disabled yourself. I am sooooo sick of people saying alcoholics have a disease. It is YOUR choice to be a loser, it is THEIR choice to drink their life into the ground. Also have you ever been to a large city? Every city has different income level housing, keeping certain things out keeps the land value up and that type of living is what defines a city. If I was rich enough to live on the south side (or anywhere else for that matter) of town I would not want an alcoholic treatment center right outside of my house. If you are ok with your kids living next to this then maybe you should have it built next door to you. People like you are the reason people think South vs North. GROW UP. "

RJ wrote on September 24, 2007 1:30 pm:
" How fast you all are forgetting 9/11. Your president failed to go after the monster behind the attacks, Osama bin Laden & his organization. Here we are in 2007, still are we safer from the monster? I believe it was your president who stated Bin Laden didn't worry him. Yet we are in Iraq, being blamed, blamed blamed for every thing. 9/11 who attacked us? "

Edgar Pearlstein wrote on September 24, 2007 2:32 pm:
" Mr. Ringsmuth is "ashamed that...they immediately challenged each point of his [Petraeus'] report". Maybe if the news media had done more challenging five years ago we wouldn't be in the mess we are now in. "

okok wrote on September 24, 2007 2:38 pm:
" By pleading the 5th he saved bth their butts. "

Jim wrote on September 24, 2007 3:42 pm:
" Nancy Wissink, I think someone should check is see if Ernie Chambers used even one dime of taxpayers money on his idiot suit. If so every person should sue him for difimation!! And I agree with Daniel Widders, but property values are so out of kelter in Lincoln its pitiful!! What goes around always comes around!!!!! "

Marky Mark wrote on September 24, 2007 3:56 pm:
" IF Jim is upset if even one dime of taxpayer money is spent by Chambers' stunt, then he must be livid with the Bush/Cheney administration's spending habits! "

Jerry wrote on September 25, 2007 2:15 am:
" Andy, you make me ashamed to be a Nebraskan. The purpose of the media is to get to the truth as is that of the congressional hearings. Especially in light of all the lies and deception coming out of the Bush administration. Can there be any doubt why there is such questioning of the "dog and pony show?" "

Husker in VA wrote on September 25, 2007 6:46 am:
" Summer, hats off to your way of thinking! Theres no place like Nebraska. After sailing around the world three times plus serving in the US Navy, I believe that dearly. Nebraskans already have the God given talent of peace making, and respect for one another. It shouldnt be an option, but an obligation to feed the foundations that are enableing our youth to prosper. Further more, why in the world reward bad behavior? To supply the jail with more money is in and of itself a reward to the prisoners. Jail should be a bad place, so that when one does finish his/her sentence they dont want to go back. People not wanting to go back wont commit crime over and over, stuffing our jails with repeated offenders. "