Now
Fair
52°
High
51°
Low
29°

In Hagel's wake, scrum for Senate seat begins

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star

Saturday, Sep 08, 2007 - 04:37:42 pm CDT

So, can any Republican not named Chuck Hagel win a Senate seat in Nebraska?

That’s the question now.

The answer has been no for 35 years.

Story Photo
In this 2001 file photo, then-Gov. Mike Johanns (left), Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., Omaha Mayor Hal Daub (right), Dennis Poppe, NCAA managing director for football and baseball (background) look out at the crowds of Rosenblatt Stadium. (LJS File)

Hagel’s decision not to seek re-election next year leaves Republicans heading into 2008 without their only winning Senate candidate since Carl Curtis claimed his last term in 1972.

Since then, Democrats have won 9 of 11 Senate races and snared seats opened by the retirement of incumbent senators three of four times.  The only GOP victories were scored by Hagel in 1996 and 2002.

Ah, but times have changed.

Republicans never have held such a huge voter registration advantage.  There are   202,000 more registered Republicans than registered Democrats in Nebraska today.

But there also are 187,000 independents.

And the Republican bulge did not prevent Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson from sweeping to a 164,000-vote landslide victory over GOP nominee Pete Ricketts last November.

Sort it all out and Nebraska appears headed toward a competitive Senate showdown next year if both parties can field strong candidates.

Hagel will formally announce his decision at an Omaha Press Club news conference Monday.

And then let the scrum begin.

Former Democratic Sen. Bob Kerrey was poised to discuss his intentions Monday after Hagel has made it official.

On the Republican side, former Omaha Mayor Hal Daub, who’s also a former four-term congressman, said Saturday he’ll have something to say then.

“Out of respect for the senator, I’ll wait to let him say what he’s going to do,” Daub said.  “Then, I’ll talk about my plans.”

Daub has completed a tour of all 93 counties in preparation for a possible Senate race.

Attorney General Jon Bruning, who entered the GOP scrap prior to waiting for Hagel’s decision, said he knows he would have “faced an uphill battle” against the senator.

“Obviously, he would have been very, very formidable.  He’s a two-term incumbent with a distinguished career and an ability to raise massive amounts of money,” Bruning said.

“But I got in this race to give a voice to conservative Nebraskans.”

Bruning has been sharply critical of Hagel’s opposition to the Bush administration’s policies in Iraq and the senator’s support for immigration reform that opens a pathway to legal status for most illegal immigrants already settled in the United States.

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns, a former Lincoln mayor and two-term governor, isn’t ready to discuss what he might do.

Johanns will be in Nebraska this week for appearances in Omaha and Grand Island, and will be honored by the Nebraska Republican Party at a Saturday event in Lincoln.

But Johanns, who is being wooed as a high-profile Republican challenger, is not going to talk about his future while he’s in the state, said spokeswoman Terri Teuber.

While Bruning has proved he’s a prolific vote-gatherer, the national spotlight is pointed toward a possible Kerrey-Johanns shootout.  

If that’s the end result, The Washington Post has suggested, Nebraska may field the premier Senate race in the 2008 election cycle with Republicans under siege nationally.

Hagel’s decision, The New York Times reported, “presents yet another challenge for the Republican Party in its effort to stop Democrats from extending their majority in Congress next year.”

Yet to be heard from is Columbus industrialist Tony Raimondo, who earlier signaled he’ll be in the Republican primary scrap if Hagel opts out of a bid for a third term.

Schuyler businessman Pat Flynn already has entered the GOP derby.

Kerrey is by far the leading Democratic prospect.  A former two-term senator and former governor, he has maintained a high national profile since he left the Senate to become president of New School University in New York City in 2001.

Last month, Kerrey informed university trustees he might resign and return to Nebraska to seek the Senate seat if Hagel is not a candidate for re-election.

“I believe Kerrey is going to run, and I think he’d be a formidable candidate,” former Republican State Chairman David Kramer of Omaha said Saturday.

“I think Mike Johanns would be the strongest candidate we could field,” Kramer said.  “He would afford us a tremendous opportunity to keep this seat.  I hope he runs.”

Despite opposition to Hagel from some core elements of his own party, Kramer said, he believes the senator would have won a third term if he had chosen to run.

“I think he would have been re-elected with a lot less difficulty than some people think,” said Kramer, a 2006 Republican Senate candidate.

“He’s been incredibly conscientious and always true to his convictions.  And Nebraska has a long history of electing folks who speak their mind.”

Hagel, he said, ushered in “a new period of prosperity for Republicans in Nebraska” when he broke the Democratic stranglehold on Nebraska Senate seats in 1996.

“And I think he will go down on the list of great U.S. senators who took leadership roles on issues important to Nebraska and the country.”

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Politics > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Tod wrote on September 8, 2007 11:46 am:
" The below sounds pretty critical, but it's a frank opinion. I don't hold anything against any of the individuals named below, but I do have an opinion on their actions and abilities. If Hagel is smart, he'll disappear quietly. Otherwise, he'll go down in ignominy. Johanns can't win the seat. Same for Daub. And, There must have been a reason Kramer lost, but I doubt it's his poor judge of character. Kerry might be able to give Bruning a run for his money since his ability to get elected has always confused me. By the way, Ricketts deserved to lose since he chose to differentiate himself as the child of a rich father. Hardly qualification to get elected. "

Anybody but Bruning wrote on September 9, 2007 7:35 am:
" A political puppet with no common sense, Please Nebraska; don't do it. "

Hjalmer wrote on September 9, 2007 9:03 am:
" I think Nebraskans should evaluate how joining in lock step with the Republican party has served the interests of this state. Our biggest export has become our children and grandchildren leaving to find jobs in states that have a plan for the future. In this state, there hasn't been a vision for the future since Bob Kerrey described one in the 1980s. At that time he talked about pursuing jobs growth is value added ag products and telecommunications. Since then, meat packing and telemarketing firms have abounded. We need a new vision from a visionary Democrat--Bob Kerrey. "

WCG wrote on September 9, 2007 9:55 am:
" Above all else, I want a Senator I can respect. I don't really care if I agree with him about everything (though, of course, I'd prefer that our philosophies were similar). I respect Bob Kerrey. I certainly don't agree with him about everything, but he's the only bright spot in Nebraska politics. On the other hand, I've completely lost all respect for Bruning, and Johanns lost my (mild) respect when he joined the Bush administration. I know little about Daub, but everything I do know is bad. All three of these Republicans would be typical 'loyal Bushies,' but that's the LAST thing our country needs right now. "

ururpast wrote on September 9, 2007 10:42 pm:
" I think I could tolerate anyone other than Kerry. He could hardly set foot in this state when he was Sen. And, has he since leaving office? "

Travis wrote on September 9, 2007 10:52 pm:
" Tough on the war on Terror, antiabortion, reduction in taxes, stopping illegal immigration stone cold, family values, smaller govt., protecting the homeland, and above all less politics and theatre. Anyone who can honestly stand for the above is better than some guy who claims to be a republican but votes with the democrats. I have more respect for Ben Nelson, at least he admits he is a liberal. "