Now
Fair
80°
High
88°
Low
73°

Armed burglar foiled by man with B.B. gun

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Wednesday, Jun 20, 2007 - 11:10:42 am CDT

An armed teenager was held at B.B.-gunpoint by the man he allegedly was trying to steal from at 23rd and Dudley streets early Wednesday.

The resident of the home told police he was sleeping, when a noise startled him. He grabbed a B.B. gun in his room and went to investigate, then found a person he did not know in his hallway.

The man was able to hold the suspected burglar until police arrived at the scene, Lincoln Police Officer Katherine Finnell said.

Police arrested a 16-year-old on suspicion of burglary, and said they found a loaded .22-caliber pistol in his shoe. The teenager was taken to the Youth Detention Center.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Good wrote on June 20, 2007 12:08 pm:
" Great! Too bad he's going to the youth dention center. He will be out before all the bloggers on here whine about guns and gun control! "

lucky wrote on June 20, 2007 12:53 pm:
" The guy with the B.B. gun is luck. Good thing the kid with .22 didn't pull it out. Hope he had the gun pumped at least 10 times. Wow good job though. "

Gun Control Advocate wrote on June 20, 2007 2:24 pm:
" See, this is the exact reason strict regulations need to be put on guns. It doesn't take a hand gun or an automatic weapon to provide protection. A bb gun or perhaps even a paint ball gun does the trick just fine! "

TC wrote on June 20, 2007 3:14 pm:
" Good? Do you know that many of the kids that get placed at the youth detention center end up sitting there FAR longer than an adult would in jail? I'm talking months longer. It's not a quick trip for most - and then they are usually shipped off to a group home of some sort. "

Tom wrote on June 20, 2007 3:17 pm:
" Gee think about it advocate. If you have your laws passed the only person with the gun would have been the kid that broke into the house. Does not make a lot of sense to me. I ever find anyone in my hallway like that you better believe the gun I have will not be a BB gun! "

gun advocate wrote on June 20, 2007 3:39 pm:
" it's not the gun moron.......it's the person holding it....why blame the gun "

Mike wrote on June 20, 2007 3:52 pm:
" A bb gun or perhaps even a paint ball gun does the trick just fine! Reality check man, this guy was lucky. Lets put a little thought into it before you post OK? "

Hey Gun Control Advocate: wrote on June 20, 2007 4:05 pm:
" How about you put a big sign in your front yard that reads: "I do not believe in home defense weapons". Maybe you'll convince burglars to turn in their guns. Maybe you can add one to your bumper too that says "I don't believe in concealed personal protection weapons" - I'm sure potential car jackers will leave you alone. Look at facts: strict gun laws do absolutely nothing to prevent violent crime. Look at Canada, Britain and Australia - all have very strict gun control laws, and all have considerably worse violent crime rates than the US. That's not just my opinion, that's a statistical fact. (Fraser Institute Study is a good summary). Or look in our own country - Washington DC has the strictest gun laws in the United States - yep, the same DC some know as the 'Murder Capital of the US". And don't give me the "the gun law is meant to change that" line - the law in DC has been in place since 76'. Sometimes personal opinion is best left out of public policy - gun laws are one of them. Those policies are best written based on the drastic effect it has on the public. Criminals don't follow laws, by defination - what makes people think they'll follow the law if it says "no guns"? "

Don't Fool Yourself wrote on June 20, 2007 4:20 pm:
" "Gun Control Advocate", your comments are typical of people that lack knowledge about guns and gun control. The man was just lucky that he didn't need to use the bb-gun, which could have easily happened had the burglar been a more experienced individual. It is extremely ignorant to even suggest that a bb-gun or paintball gun can provide an adequate means to self-defense, especially if the suspect is also armed. A bb-gun working as a deterrent in this one isolated case would not be the norm. This guys was really lucky! "

Western Nevada wrote on June 20, 2007 5:04 pm:
" Wow. Seriously lucky. Not smart, but certainly leading a charmed life that night. I wonder if he will continue to believe in his luck or whether he'll wake up and realize the next bad guy may not be a clueless teenager. He needs better security on his doors and windows. And he needs a better gun. Remember: "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away." "

Gun Control Advocate wrote on June 20, 2007 5:36 pm:
" I actually have a taser, I believe it would work in a dire situation. "

evp wrote on June 20, 2007 7:04 pm:
" Yippee! Finally a credible, real-life example documented in Lincoln and he wasn't even a permit holder. Myself I will always be prepared to protect myself against any attacker - I don't expect our cops to protect me when I call 911 (it's impossible). Thank God our Legislature did do one thing right over the many years of tax increases. And that was making it legal for me to learn how to protect myself with a weapon I do not have to keep out in the open. Were it not for the new law, I never would have taken the training course and would be helpless against this type of personal attack. Thanks again to everyone who fought for my right to defend myself with more than just a can of spray. "

ralph wrote on June 20, 2007 10:03 pm:
" Have you ever heard the saying "don't take a BB gun to a "GUN" fight?" Wow, bad move it could have turn bad real quick. I'm glad he's ok. "

Jim wrote on June 21, 2007 12:37 am:
" The guy with the BB gun was lucky (and stupid). The kid with the 22 was lucky he didn't get a face full of 00 Buck. CCW laws and permits have nothing to do with it. The guy with the BB gun didn't need a permit of any kind. We will fight to the death to keep it that way. "

Not right wrote on June 21, 2007 7:56 am:
" The man with a bb gun should have just given whatever to the robber. That way nobody gets hurt. The homeowner violated the robbers rights by holding him at bb-gun-point, and not allowing him to leave. The homeowner should be arrested and charged as well. "

WHAT THE wrote on June 21, 2007 8:32 am:
" ummm I'm sorry why should the home owner be charged? Whose home was violated? It was just a b.b. gun and I'm sure the 16 year old given the "option" to leave woulda pulled out his gun first and shot him... "

duh wrote on June 21, 2007 9:00 am:
" Not right are you high? The robber gave up all his rights by breaking into the man's home. He deserved to be held at BB-gun point. Ever heard of a citizen's arrest? "

wlg wrote on June 21, 2007 9:14 am:
" To "Not Right" The robber lost his right to anything the moment he broke into someone's private residence to commit an illegal act. Give me a break!!!!! Your statement proves, that criminals have more rights than the victim. I guarantee, if someone breaks into my home, I won't care about his rights. I will protect my own, the laws says I can& I will hold him with my gun until I no longer need to, TO Heck with his rights!!! "

ARE YOU SERIOUS NOT RIGHT wrote on June 21, 2007 9:35 am:
" Are you serious. The home owner should be in trouble for someone else breaking into his house? "

Dawg wrote on June 21, 2007 9:58 am:
" Not Right, U ever here of citizens arrest??? "

JL wrote on June 21, 2007 11:49 am:
" My god, I seriously think my IQ level declined after reading some of these comments. And to "Not Right", maybe he should have offered him some milk and cookies before he sent him on his merry way. When he entered that house to burglarize it he chose to forfeit his "rights". If you're going to say nonsense like that I am sure all of the criminal type would love to have your address, because they know they would be in no danger of getting caught, even if you did wake up to find them in yur house you would just hold the door open for them. Heck, maybe you could grab the other end of your TV and help them load it into their car. "

lol wrote on June 21, 2007 11:52 am:
" Not right... wow I sure hope that you were kidding, sad thing is that the homeowner may very well be charged for protecting his own home from an intruder. That is just another flaw with our justice system. Let us protect our homes with whatever arms we so choose; I'm pretty sure that it says something like that somewhere in the laws of our land... oh wait that's called the 2nd Amendment! Harsher punishments for stupid kids that think they're tough carrying around a piece. Make them suffer from the consequences of their actions rather than slapping them on the wrist and calling it a day. "

Legal!! Not at my House. wrote on June 21, 2007 12:25 pm:
" This individual was being detained pending the arrival of Law Enforcement. Had he broke into my home, he wouldn't have been that lucky!! My home is protected by Smith & Wesson. "

not right? wrote on June 21, 2007 12:42 pm:
" I hope that comment is sarcasm. "

Robert wrote on June 21, 2007 2:55 pm:
" I can only hope that the homeowner reads these comments. If he does, he should know how lucky he is not to be dead this morning. Dude....head on over to Sheels and get yourself a pump shotgun- just the sound of racking the slide will make most bad guys lose control of their bladder and run...you don't even have to be in the same room. "

mike wrote on June 21, 2007 3:22 pm:
" Now lets wait for the ACLU to come in and file a lawsuit against the homeowner for 'violating the criminal's civil rights'. Sound crazy??? I have seen worse come out of that organization. "

reality wrote on June 23, 2007 7:24 am:
" Is there not already a "strict regulation" (aka: a law) which prohibits 16 year olds from possessing a handgun? Isn't there also a law against concealing a firearm without a permit? Isn't there another strict regulation against breaking into someone's home, and another for committing a crime with a weapon? Exactly how many more strict regulations do you think we need to institute to get the criminals to follow them? "