Now
Fair
74°
High
95°
Low
70°

Funding for rural wireless faces threat

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Sunday, May 20, 2007 - 12:16:34 am CDT

Nebraskans who have grown frustrated with spotty cell phone service in rural Nebraska, should hang up and pay attention to an erupting battle over billion-dollar subsidies.

The Federal Communication Commission has proposed capping the amount of subsidies paid to improve cell phone systems in rural parts of the United States.

Cell phone companies are battling the proposal, but they face a powerful and entrenched foe in the landline companies who fear future cuts in the subsidies that they have been receiving for years.

The cap could be particularly detrimental to Nebraska, which only recently has begun to receive federal subsidies to improve cell phone service, and because state officials so far continue to funnel all state subsidies to landline systems even though the state collects millions of dollars from cell phone customers.

Alltel Vice President Bill Ashburn said that the cellular company received about $20 million last year that it is using to improve its cell system in places such as Red Cloud, Falls City, Humboldt, Johnson, Cook, Ainsworth and Imperial.

The proposal to cap funding would put a “big-time” crimp in its plans to “build out more areas” in rural Nebraska, Ashburn said.

The FCC says it wants to cap cell phone subsidies while it comes up with a plan to reform the whole subsidy system known as the federal Universal Service Fund.

The theory of the Universal Service Fund is that subsidies are required to induce companies to provide service in high-cost areas such as rural Nebraska where customers are few and far between.

In Nebraska, where the number of cell phone lines has exceeded the number of landline phones since last year, the vast bulk of subsidies go to landline companies, even though cell phone users pay millions of dollars into the state and federal funds.

Reform is definitely needed for a number of reasons. One is that new Internet-based phone systems aren’t required to pay into the fund. The concept needs to be modified to keep pace with developing technology.

Rep. Lee Terry has introduced legislation in Congress that would reform the fund in several ways, including an intriguing provision that would allow the fund to be used to subsidize broadband service to rural Nebraska.

But there is little justification for capping on cell phone subsidies. Cell phone companies have some powerful arguments on their side. Since 1998 cell phone companies have received only $2 billion in subsidies compared to $24 billion for landline companies. In 2007 the amount of subsidies going to cell phone companies is expected to rise by only $300 million, according to the FCC.

It seems reasonable to allow cell phone companies to finally get a more equitable share of the subsidy while Congress works on reform. Nebraskans would appreciate fewer dropped calls when they roam across the wide open spaces of their state.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Okie wrote on May 20, 2007 9:21 am:
" When are Nebraskans ever going to learn? They had a chance to have statewide broadband service when Dave Hahn proposed using the public power grid. In some cases, the private sector is not always the best answer. "

John wrote on May 20, 2007 10:07 pm:
" Wireline is a dying technology. All those millions given to the independent wireline companies could be used to subsidize wireless, both voice and wireless internet. The wireline companies know this which is why they fight to the bitter end to keep their subsidy to line their pockets. "

Confused wrote on May 21, 2007 12:35 am:
" I don't understand why I, as a city dweller, should be forced to help companies expand service that few will use anyway. If it costs so much to provide service in the middle of nowhere, let capitalism take it's course, either don't provide it, or charge rural customers more. It's not my fault you live in the middle of nowhere but want good cell phone service like you live in the city. Why should I pay a tax so your cell phone bill is cheaper? "

GI Reader wrote on May 21, 2007 10:06 am:
" I hope you never travel outside the boundaries of the city of Lincoln given your feelings about subsidization. The towns listed are on Nebraska highways. It's 16 miles from Humboldt to Pawnee City, home of Schillingbridge Winery & Micro Brewery which has won international awards for its Edelweiss. Red Cloud is 40 miles south of Hastings on Hwy. 281 and has the Willa Cather Foundation which hosts an annual conference attended by scholars from around the country. Ainsworth, Falls City, Imperial, and Red Cloud all have hospitals. Please expand your seemingly narrow view of life outside of Lincoln and realize there's a lot of Nebraska's economic blood line running in rural Nebraska that supports the Nebraska tax system. "

Greedy wrote on August 13, 2007 11:37 am:
" The wireless companies make enough in just the fees they charge every month. They can well afford to pony up the dough without subsidies. "

oldstruck wrote on September 1, 2007 7:03 pm:
" confused, I travel all over nebraska. You must not realize that taxes in nebraska that are used for highway maintenance are mainly used in the eastern part of the state. Also a percentage of the school taxes go to lincoln and are redistributed out by the size of the school district (number of students, not land area). It would only be fair to get some of it back in a way that we all could utilize, including you. Another shining example, that the lives of people in rural nebraska are worth less that they are in Omaha and Lincoln. By the way, I would not wish this on you, but if you are ever in rural nebraska, dont have an emergency that you need to use your cell phone. I can tell you would be the first person screaming that you had no cell service where you are! "