Now
Fair
64°
High
81°
Low
62°

Unresolved beef issue threatens free-trade deal with S. Korea

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By The Associated Press

Tuesday, Apr 03, 2007 - 05:37:49 pm CDT

SEOUL, South Korea — The free trade deal between the United States and South Korea is being jeopardized by its failure to reopen the Korean market to U.S. beef exports.

In Washington, two key senators warned though that the agreement will not win congressional approval unless South Korea drops a ban on the import of U.S. beef that it imposed in December 2003 after the first reported US. case of mad cow disease. Negotiators were unable to resolve the issue as part of the free trade talks.

“I will oppose the Korea Free Trade Agreement, and in fact I will not allow it to move through the Senate, unless and until Korea completely lifts its ban on U.S. beef,” said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. and the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, which handles trade issues.

Story Photo
South Korean environmental activists, including one wearing a costume symbolizing imported U.S. beef infected with mad cow disease, perform during a rally against imports of American beef near the U.S. embassy in Seoul, Sunday, April 1, 2007. The United States and South Korea reached a free trade agreement, but it is jeopardized by the agreements failure to reopen Korea's market to U.S. beef. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)

“This agreement is dead on arrival until the beef issue gets resolved,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the Finance Committee. He said while U.S. pork and soybean producers stand to benefit he was disappointed that South Korea refused to open its rice market.

While many business groups from high-tech to music voiced support for the deal, auto executives at Ford Motor Co. and Daimler Chrysler AG’s U.S. unit Chrysler Group said they would urge rejection because negotiators failed to do enough to lift Korea’s high barriers to U.S.-made cars.

“This agreement as we understand it will not open the Korean market to free trade in automobiles,” said Steve Biegun, a Ford vice president.

It is the biggest trade deal ever for South Korea, which in nearly 50 years has grown from one of the world’s poorest countries to become its 10th-largest economy.

It is also the biggest U.S. trade deal since the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico.

South Korea, under pressure from farmers who were worried that eliminating protections for rice would destroy the domestic industry, succeeded in keeping the staple food out of the deal. But Seoul agreed to lower tariffs on other agricultural goods, including U.S. oranges.

“We kept our promise that rice will be excluded from the market opening,” South Korean Trade Minister Kim Hyun-chong told reporters.

South Korean labor and farm groups have denounced the free trade deal, demonstrating in Seoul and other cities, saying an influx of U.S. imports will cost jobs and harm livelihoods.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Business > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
WCG wrote on April 4, 2007 6:35 am:
" This is the problem with having two senators per state - rural interests have a disproportionate amount of influence in Washington. And so we get subsidies for corn-based ethanol, among other idiotic things. In this case, South Korea has a reasonable excuse for keeping out U.S. beef - mad cow disease. And when they relaxed restrictions, our beef packers immediately blew it by sending a package containing spinal material (which was prohibited). There's a simple way out. Just test every steer. But our government refuses to do that, or even to allow individual companies to do it, voluntarily. We'd rather just whine about other countries than fix the problem. Nebraska politicians assure South Korea - and us - that beef is safe, and it probably is. But, of course, they'd say the same thing if it was killing every other person who ate a steak. It's all about economics,... and votes. "

KP wrote on April 4, 2007 9:33 am:
" That is why there is a house and a senate. Senate recieves 2 reps p/ state which gives a advantage to the smaller states (because it's higher representation p/capita) In the house of representatives a states representation is based on the amount of people in the state. That is why Nebraska has 3 and Texas has a god awful amount of representatives (not sure how many didn't want to look it up.) This makes Nebraska almost a mute point in the house. Either way is unfair but if you have both it works out. "

R wrote on April 4, 2007 11:18 am:
" I say two can play "their" game and eliminate the free trade and tariff the heck out of them. Don't we buy all our goods and tainted pet supplys from China? "

TS wrote on April 4, 2007 11:45 am:
" It is the people that make the trade deals that are the problem. And it is not just with beef. We should have fair trade not give away the store. You could have 100 senators but it would do no good if the president is able to make the so called free trade deals. If you were to have fair trade there would or should not be such a imbalance of trade with everyone you trade with. It can’t go on this way forever. "