Now
Fair
64°
High
85°
Low
64°

Private ownership of Nebraska’s wind energy resources has some lawmakers worried

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By ALGIS J. LAUKAITIS / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, Mar 21, 2007 - 08:56:26 am CDT

Nebraska could be on the verge of what some people say is the biggest land grab since the Homestead days, when early settlers staked their claims to 160 acres.

But this time, speculators are after thousand of acres of land, not hundreds. And they don’t want the land for growing crops. They want to use it to harvest wind energy.

“Nebraska has not seen this kind of gold rush mentality,” said John Hansen, president of the Lincoln-based Nebraska Farmers Union. “Nebraska is sitting on a ton of wind capacity.”

Story Photo
Kimball's wind farm was the first built in the state. It is owned and opportated by the Municipal Energy Agency of Nebraska. (LJS File)
Where are the wind turbines?

Nebraska has 48 operational wind turbines on five sites. Together they generate about 73 megawatts, enough to power about 21,880 homes. Here are the locations and owners:

Ainsworth: 36 wind turbines, Nebraska Public Power District

Kimball: 7, Municipal Energy Agency of Nebraska

Lincoln: 2, Lincoln Electric System

Springview: 2, NPPD and five other utilities

Valley: 1, Omaha Public Power District

Source: Nebraska Energy Office



Hansen said he’s heard reports of developers buying up wind rights on land in Custer,  Cherry, Madison, Boone and Antelope counties with an eye for building wind energy farms.

In Boone County,  a firm called Third Planet Wind, LLC, based in Bad Axe, Mich., is talking to landowners about acquiring wind development rights and is in the process of setting up a meteorological tower east of the small town of Petersburg, said Shannon Landauer, assistant director of the county’s economic development agency.

In Cherry County, two private developers who want to build wind farms near Valentine have filed applications to connect with Nebraska Public Power District’s transmission system, said Dave Rich, the utility’s renewable energy development manager. Rich, citing nondisclosure agreements, declined to name the two developers but said the two projects would total 130 megawatts.

Two corporations also have secured wind rights to 11,500 acres in north-central Nebraska. With 48 turbines, the Holt County Wind Farm would be the largest in the state and would generate 100 megawatts, enough to power between 25,000 and 40,000 homes for a year.  Hansen  and others believe it could be the first of many wind farms built by private corporations eager to gain footholds in a public power state.

Dubbed “the Saudi Arabia of wind” by former Gov. Mike Johanns, Nebraska ranks sixth in the nation in terms of  wind energy resources.

Wind speed across the state ranges from 6.4 to 16.8 mph.

NPPD and other electric utilities, including Lincoln Electric System, have built a handful of small wind projects, but experts say Nebraska’s wind energy potential remains untapped and ripe for picking.

“We are extremely alarmed at the prospect of large, out-of-state private-sector developers coming into our state and buying up wind development rights,” Hansen said.

Lawmakers and others fear corporations will buy up land at bargain prices and farmers and communities will lose out on the economic benefits of the coming wind energy boom.

The Bush administration has said it wants the U.S. to generate 20 percent of its energy from wind by 2030. Last year, wind generation became the cheapest method of producing electricity, dipping below the cost of coal production.

“Nebraska must act now to keep wind energy profits within the state,” state Sen. Cap Dierks of Ewing wrote in a recent news release signed by 11 other state senators. “If  you own land, beware of wind energy developer offers that are likely far less than your resources are worth.

“Each windmill is worth about $150,000 annually to its owner — and ownership is the key,”  the state senator wrote.

On Monday, Attorney General Jon Bruning and state Sen. Annette Dubas of Fullerton urged landowners to use caution when approached by wind energy developers.

“As with any contract, once you sign on the dotted line, you’re making a commitment that could affect you for a long time,” Bruning said in a news release. “It’s important to clearly understand the terms of the agreement and consult a legal or financial professional before signing anything over.”

Gerard J. Keating, a former Atkinson resident who has been working with his brother, Matthew J. Keating to build the Holt County Wind Farm, said the project is an economic development opportunity for the area and the state and will help the U.S. to  become energy independent. He said Nebraska is lagging behind neighbor states like Iowa, South Dakota and Kanas in developing its wind energy resources.

Keating disagreed with state senators who believe big corporations are out to take advantage of rural landowners. He said there is room for both public power, individuals and corporations to develop wind farms in Nebraska.

“I think it’s ridiculous that they think we landowners do not know what we are doing,” he said in a phone interview from his office in Geneva, Illinois. “I’m a landowner and I don’t appreciate them telling me how to do my business. I have done the research and I am getting full value.”

Midwest Wind Energy recently revealed its plan for the Holt County Wind Farm before an enthusiastic group of 90 business and government leaders in Atkinson.

“Holt County like many other (counties) are dealing with the failure of the Legislature to appropriate funding for rural schools, Keating said. “They have to take control of their tax destiny.”

 The $160 million project would represent one of the largest private investments ever in rural Nebraska, according to Patty Wood of the state Department of Economic Development.

The economic impact to Holt County would be $6.5 million in personal property taxes paid to local governments over a five- to10-year period.  In addition, about 15 percent of the total project cost, or $24 million would be invested locally for material and services needed to construct the project.

About 120 jobs will be created during the one-year construction period and eight permanent full-time employees would be needed to operate and maintain the facility.

Michael Donahue, executive vice president of Midwest Wind Energy, one of two companies behind the Holt County Wind Farm project, agreed landowners should consider all options before signing over wind rights.

“I think landowners need to make sure that they are not being taken advantage of,” he said. “They need to research what is going on. They need to understand the difference between various alternatives and make sure their interests are protected. We are not looking to take advantage of them ourselves.”

The Legislature is considering several bills that would help farmers and ranchers reap economic benefits of wind energy.  LB629, for example, would create a Community-Based Energy Development, or C-BED, plan that would allow Nebraska communities and landowners to get the maximum value from their wind resources.

LB648 would create a sales tax exemption for C-BED projects, and LB672 would address eminent domain issues.

Senator Dubas said those types of bills allow lawmakers and citizens to participate in the wind energy development process.

“The Legislature should be setting the priority and setting the direction of where we want to go with wind and renewable energy,” Dubas said. 

Representatives from Midwest Wind Energy met with NPPD officials recently to discuss the possibility of NPPD buying the 100 megawatts of electricity from the Holt County Wind Farm project.

“We will have to evaluate the cost of energy from this facility, compared to other energy resources,” said NPPD spokeswoman Beth Boesch. “We’re interested in learning more about it.”

Boesch denied reports NPPD is negotiating with the company but said the utility would like to increase its renewable energy portfolio from less than 1 percent to 5 percent. NPPD is the state’s largest wholesale supplier of electricity.

Midwest Energy and Edison Mission Midwest are the first corporations to knock on NPPD’s doors. Boesch said half a dozen developers have approached the district asking if NPPD would be interested in buying  power from their projects.

Donahue said his company came to Nebraska because of the strong winds.

“You can’t deny that the wind resource is one of the best in the country,” he said. “I think there is opportunity to develop wind here.”

But Hansen is afraid private projects, like the one planned by Midwest Wind Energy, could undermine the long-term integrity of the state’s public power system. All electric utilities are publicly owned and are mandated by law to provide low-cost, reliable power.

The Nebraska Farmers Union has been working for several years to get a C-BED plan for wind energy development here. Such a plan,  Hansen said, closely works with public power to provide the most economic benefit to landowners and the state instead of sending profits elsewhere.

“We think that this project serves as a wake-up call to public power in Nebraska that they can’t wait and continue to sit and watch ... and expect large private-sector players not to come in,” Hansen said.

Donahue disagrees that private-sector wind energy projects undermine public power. He said private projects have to undergo the same scrutiny by the state Power Review Board as public power projects. 

“We fully recognize that Nebraska is a public-power state. We understand that and we respect that, and we realize that the only potential purchasers of the wind we would generate would necessarily be a public utility,” he said.

Donahue said he wants to make it clear Midwest Wind Energy will not sell power generated by the Holt County Wind Farm to buyers outside of Nebraska.

“There is not an intent to go around public power in Nebraska. What we hope to do is negotiate a mutual power purchase agreement with public power (in this case NPPD) and provide them low-cost, renewable energy at or below the cost of which they could generate it themselves,” he said.

Donahue believes C-BED  projects can play a big role in Nebraska, like they have in Iowa and Minnesota, which already have big wind farms.

“Other states with a lesser wind resource than Nebraska have been successful because they have used a three-prong approach: public power, C-BED plans and independent power producers, all working together to develop the renewable resource,” Donahue said.

The Holt County Wind Farm is not a done deal.

NPPD said it will look closely at economic and transmission issues, and right now, it has other priorities, like restoring its storm-damaged power transmission system.

Said Donahue: “I’m hopeful that we can work out a win-win situation that’s going to be good for NPPD, good for local landowners, the local communities and Holt County — that’s the goal.”

Reach Algis J. Laukaitis at 473-7243 or alaukaitis@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Whatever wrote on March 21, 2007 5:19 am:
" Lot's of land and very few people mean little to worry about from neighbors who may object to an "unsightly" windmill. Sounds like out of state business interests have been doing their homework. What have Nebraska's business and political leaders been doing? I think some additional articles on this subject are warrented. Hopefully our leaders are prepared for the water grab that is coming next. "

Mike in DC wrote on March 21, 2007 6:21 am:
" What about the long term legal issues of wind power, ala water rights? A few turbines are OK; but what about thousands and thousands? We know that removing energy from the atmosphere will affect weather; but will it be significant or insignificant and what is significant? What happens if Iowa gets 1" less rain per year because of the wind turbines? What happens if Nebraska farmers get less rain? Even if it is just 1" per year less? Are these questions answered with enough certainty? People have done research and modeling on the issue; but it may not be rigorous enough at this juncture. Maybe there is no way to separate (they are confounded) what would happen because of enormous wind power farms given the changes already predicted in the atmosphere; but that doesn't mean that the lawyers won't go after the cash. And, can the wind farms operate cohabitively with agriculture? "

diann wrote on March 21, 2007 7:49 am:
" I'm glad someone is waking up our PUBLIC POWER. Maybe now they will be more open to the private sector who want to make their own power so they would buy back the power the person doesn't use. This has to be better than building coal-fired power plants that are being built in Grand Island and Columbus which will be near the Platte River. "

connie wrote on March 21, 2007 8:08 am:
" What about selling 'wind rights' like landowners now sell mineral rights? I've seen these windmills amongst thriving fields of corn and wheat, and with cattle contentedly grazing in their shadow. A landowner apparently doesn't have to give up his land for agricultural use at all, merely share it and collect a nice fee. "

JR wrote on March 21, 2007 9:04 am:
" "Nebraska is lagging behind Iowa, S.D. & Kansas." What else is new!!?? Lets be sure to not let any outsider into the state of Nebraska. We wouldn't want anybody smarter than Nebraskans to move in!!! If a farmer is dumb enough to sell his land for bargin prices, thats his problem!! Theres plenty of wind in Lincoln, its just that it keeps raising property taxes. But then Lincoln is always on the end of the cows tail and always will be til everybody's broke. "

jc wrote on March 21, 2007 9:17 am:
" Another example of supposedly conservative nebraskans shunning progress because they fear change. When placed properly, wind energy is a great form of conservation. Sure it's easier to let farmers plant corn or get paid by the Govt to not plant corn - but it's not going to last. "

CS wrote on March 21, 2007 9:44 am:
" Wind farms can coexist as easily with agriculture as cellular towers can. With as much land as what NE has that just sits around because of subsidies' restrictions, and cattle land that doesn't have cattle on it, how can this not be a good idea. Leave it to some people to find nothing positive about anything. Tax revenues from racing? NOOOO....it might make MY property value go down.Maybe if you LIVED in your house instead of tapping it like a bank account the resale value wouldn't matter so much, and your hypothetical loss would be offset by tourism and racing receipts. Wind Energy? NOOOOO.....it might affect rainfall(?). That study was done with 10,000 unit wind farms, not the type being discussed here(http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=16385). No one is advocating removing all other forms of power production.In any case that opinion has just as many in opposition.(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3811551.stm) "

ts wrote on March 21, 2007 9:59 am:
" This will be a lot better than the government paying farmers to grow corn . Or using up way to much water to make alcohol. I think this is a win win deal for everyone for once the tax payer will not be paying for this. "

Sylvia wrote on March 21, 2007 10:00 am:
" I'd rather have all of Nebraska bought up by people who want to sell wind power, than all of the people who want to start enormous hog and dairy factories. At least windmills don't use all of our water, employ illegal aliens, poison what water is left, and stink up the place. "

Funny wrote on March 21, 2007 10:53 am:
" Isn't it funny that nobody in Nebraska paid any attention to the state's wind potential until people from outside of the state showed interest? Our environment is suffering from our massive energy use - wind energy is a great way to help the environment and the people who try to live off it as well! "

Roger wrote on March 21, 2007 11:00 am:
" Dubas and company needs to get out of the restriction of business and legislatures need to let private business develop and legislatures need to get out of controlling private business and let business develop with the market. Markets can not and will not be markets is they are driven by government. Government has only one roll and that is to protect people from bad business and not to legislate business start up. We have too many power hungry people in politics and some of them even come from rural areas like Fullerton. Let the Market develop by itself and don't dictate practices or how it will develop, we already found out that initiative 300 was bad policy and not constitutional so don't try to pass any more unconstitutional legislation. Get on with being policy makers not policy breakers. Let the Market develop itself naturally. That is why farming has become so lopsided, as too much subsidizing and not enough free enterprise. "

Mike what are you smoking? wrote on March 21, 2007 11:09 am:
" "We know that removing energy from the atmosphere will affect weather" Please post a cite for this absurd claim. "

how much wrote on March 21, 2007 11:26 am:
" I think I will put one up in my back yard, How much will you think it will cost and will save in the long run? "

Bob wrote on March 21, 2007 12:54 pm:
" It is good to see that Nebraska is starting to develop its wind energy resources. Private business should not be precluded from developing and/or operating wind energy. I also applaud the government for getting the word out urging all landowners to seek counsel and educate themselves as to the worth of the wind rights. It sounds like Mr. Keating has researched the issue and is in a position to make an informed decision. Eventually, as wind power is developed and all buyers in the state are sated, it will be necessary to sell and ship power out of state, assuming of course the transmission line losses, etc, are reasonable. Hopefully, land owners throughout Nebraska can benefit from this development. "

airedale wrote on March 21, 2007 1:35 pm:
" I am interested in knowing whether Bruning and Dubas have any financial interests in local companies that might suffer from a little out of state competition. "

Oh Yeah.... wrote on March 21, 2007 1:55 pm:
" And how is this so much different from using this land to grow corn to make ethanol? This is actually much more efficient. Methinks the government is afraid of losing out on some tax money from this 'gold rush'. "

annoyed wrote on March 21, 2007 2:36 pm:
" It would be nice if Nebraska started giving huge tax breaks to housing developers that built the community around solar and wind power. Each house with a solar panel, of course energy efficient appliances, and then a big wind turbine for the housing development....But I guess I'm only seeing what will be happening in other states and already is... "

Julie wrote on March 21, 2007 2:37 pm:
" Oh Yeah ... you are right on the money with your comment. They just wish it was them that did it. Nebraska didn't want those windmills for them selves since they wyou have to buy back any excess energy. "

Bob wrote on March 21, 2007 5:15 pm:
" Lets not get carried away. A wind turbine for every tract? These things need to be hundreds of feet tall to maximize efficiency/cost. I would not want one in the immediate neighborhood, and it doesn't need to be. Studies exist that map out the wind potential for evry state. The maximum wind areas is where these will be built. And solar panels for houses do have tax rebates. However, they still cost $15,000 and up per house. My neighbor's no longer works after 10 years. The cells age due to the sun! We need solar cells that are shielded from the sun. Thats a fundamental problem! "

just curious wrote on March 21, 2007 8:53 pm:
" With 4 dollar a bushel corn and a gold rush for wind rights, will the government still subsidize farms? Actually initiative 300 did serve it's purpose. Without it, the eastern half of nebraska not annexed by Omaha would be one huge corporate feedlot. At least we don't have Kermit Brashear passing legislation mandating that wind power only be sold to corporate monopolies. "

joe9wicket wrote on March 21, 2007 11:56 pm:
" Whatever happened to the Farmer's Union effort to get a wind farm developed about 3 years ago? Oh, that's right, the federal tax credit was going to expire, so they let the application process drag out 'til they ran out of time... me thinks anyone who says be wary of out of state developers of wind energy has their back pocket full of hot air...Whenever I drive through Iowa or Minnesota, I am embarrassed by the lack of wind turbines here. The NIMBY crowd needs to grow up and just accept it...besides, there are other designs that don't necessarily need to be 200 ft tall and occupy 4 acres to work. It would actually be more profitable for a farmer to have one turbine, grow no corn, and let their cattle roam on grass, rather than continue to be stuck in this vicious cycle of using energy to produce energy.... we've wasted enough time and money on ethanol already, when we could have been working on plug-in hybrid bio diesel cars and removing coal from the equation... "