Now
Mostly Cloudy
66°
High
69°
Low
51°

Community Columnist: It's time to bring 'em home

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

BY MARK WEDDLETON

Saturday, Oct 28, 2006 - 12:23:13 am CDT

Bring ’em home.

That's what Susan Emanuel is asking. And she doesn't just mean her son, who has been serving in Iraq for the past year with the Nebraska National Guard 189th Transportation Co. She wants all the American men and women in uniform who are serving in that war-torn country pulled out of harm's way.

"The conflict in Iraq has changed into a civil war," Susan points out. "Only the Iraqis themselves can settle the differences between Sunnis and Shiites."

What about Bob Boyce? His son is a U.S. Marine who's been to Iraq and will be back there again. "My son and his fellow soldiers did not make the terrible decision to invade Iraq. Now they're making the best they can of a bad situation. They deserve our support."

What does supporting the troops mean to Bob? Bring ’em home.

Susan and Bob are both regulars at the weekly peace vigil held every Wednesday from 5 to 6 p.m. at the Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall in downtown Lincoln.

On a typical week you'll find a diverse bunch of folks out there with them: a Goodyear striker, a pastor, a Lincoln High School student, a homemaker, a Vietnam vet, a college professor, a guitarist in a rock band, a medical doctor, a retiree, a sandwich maker and maybe two or three dozen others.

There are as many reasons folks come to the vigils as there are participants. Some have opposed the Iraq war and occupation all along. Others think it wasn't a bad idea in the beginning but has become a terrible mess. Concern about possible military action against Iran and North Korea also draws people out. The one thing that unites us all is that call: Bring ’em home

We're there to share our anguish and our conviction that in a democracy we as citizens cannot stand idly by as the human toll mounts. "When I miss a vigil, I feel guilty seeing the photos of the dead soldiers in the newspaper," one regular participant told me.

The gatherings have become a sort of dialogue with the folks passing by. And it's clear that most people are glad to see us out there.

Sure, we get some thumbs downs — and middle fingers up. But overwhelmingly we are greeted with what is at times a boisterous chorus of honks and cheers. And the support is broad: We're just as likely to get a supportive wave from the driver of a jet black Hummer with a yellow "Support Our Troops" sticker as we are from a passing bicyclist.

We've passed a turning point in people's perceptions about U.S. policy in Iraq. Whatever feelings were when the war started back in the spring of 2003, now there's a common understanding that we're in a quagmire.

No longer do most Nebraskans believe that to speak out is wrong because it might undermine the morale of the troops. They see that what is unfolding in Iraq is horrifically bloody. It's killing or crippling so many U.S. soldiers while costing the lives of tens or hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.

They question whether continuing these sacrifices can stop the steady descent of Iraq into what its own government calls "the darkness." Didn't Maj. Gen. William Caldwell, a top U.S. military leader on the scene, call the recent Battle for Baghdad a failure? It was supposed to be a decisive step in turning things around.

Nebraskans find it harder and harder to buy the argument that staying there will make us or the Iraqis safer. All indications are that the U.S. presence inflames sectarian violence and creates fertile ground for terrorists.

This points to another reason people come to the vigils. We find there a sense of community sorely needed in these times. So much of the daily news feeds into feelings of despair and hopelessness. When we come together at the peace vigils, it's a chance to take the weight of the world off our individual shoulders and share it collectively. 

To gather for an hour in this common cause, to spend this time with similarly concerned citizens, to see the response we get from the passersby — this is empowering and hope-inspiring. We come away invigorated when we blend our collective voices in the call: Bring ’em home.

Weddleton is a leader of the Coalition for Peace (www.fmclincoln.org/Coalition_for_ Peace.htm). He encourages you to honk and wave when you pass the weekly peace vigil. Better yet, bundle up and join in!

 


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Hemet wrote on October 28, 2006 1:13 am:
" Yes Mark, its time to bring em home and not repete the insanity of the war in VietNam. Its time to stop this nonsense that is nothing more than the fueling of an incompetent Presidents ego. "

Jody P. wrote on October 28, 2006 9:27 am:
" NO! NO! Let's stay there for another 100 years or longer! I know at the current rates that would amount to 100,000 dead American soldiers, and millions of dead Iraqis, and hundreds of trillions of dollars, but let's not lose sight of our main goal. What's important is that we don't admit to ourselves that little Junior in the White House sent our troops off to war based soley on lies. Oh no, we can't ever admit that to ourselves. So let's just stay there forever and ever. That's the smart thing to do, no question about it. Bill O'Reilly even says so. "

Marilyn McNabb wrote on October 28, 2006 9:47 am:
" Thanks to Mark Weddleton for saying "The Emperor Has No Clothes!" when most of us are busy pretending everything is fine, just fine. We didn't understand this country when we occupied it and we certainly don't understand it well enough to run it as a democracy now. The troops need to come home and all the U.S. bases closed. The longer we stay, the worse it gets. "

what would you do? wrote on October 28, 2006 11:18 am:
" What would you that are against the war do instead? Our military is there to help straighten out a country so we might not be terrorized again like 9-11 and the numerous other terrorist acts over the last many years. Nobody wants war, but it's a fact of life. I hear you all that are against it, but has anyone come up with an actual workable solution? We can't just back out and say to the Iraqies that it's their baby and they need to take care of it. It would be nice if all of our allies stepped up their support and we kicked butt and took names and got he over quicker. Welcome Home 189th...& thanks. "

A response to "WWYD?" wrote on October 28, 2006 8:02 pm:
" We did "kick butt" back in 2003. The "mission was accomplished". Then we found out the limits of a military solution... It's not "the Iraqi's baby" -- it's their country. The large majority of them want us out, as we would want them out of ours if the table was turned. One of the mistakes that flows so frequently from the arrogance we Americans have is the idea that it is our right and duty to "straighten out" other countries. We have no such right and, frankly, we're not doing such a good job of it in Iraq anyway. Those who attacked us on 9/11 didn't come from Iraq. Since then, however, almost 3000 of us have died in those desert sands so far from home. How has that made us safer? Intelligence reports indicate hatred of the U.S. on the rise around the world -- making terrorists more popular, not more isolated. "

Adam Hintz wrote on October 30, 2006 9:11 am:
" Great article! Now, let's get our boys home and keep them out of Iran! "

D wrote on November 1, 2006 7:30 am:
" My son-in-law is in Iraq today. The difference in this War and others is simply the media and the ignorance of the general public to be easily influenced. Ultimately, we will get what we deserve if we choose to withdraw from Iraq and this war of terrorism will be brought to the USA, again. Civilians will be the targets and it will be much more difficult to fight here than it is in Iraq. Certainly the strategy of the war has been mishandled. Without a doubt. Soon this conflict will have lasted LONGER than the US involvement in WWII. The loss of one life is too many but keep the big picture in perspective. From mid 1938 when Hitler invaded Poland until the Atomic Bomb in August, 1945, world wide, 10,000 people PER DAY lost there lives. If you don't think that can happen again, maybe you should just rethink the entire issue. The debate brought on by those who wish to give up and just "bring the troops home" is very simplistic but very good for our country. This war should be the major point of discussion everywhere in the USA. "

Jerry C wrote on November 2, 2006 3:15 pm:
" Folks who believe we will be fighting terrorists here if we leave Iraq are just not listening. Osama Bin Laden attacked us in 9/11 and Bush said he was going after Suddam instead. Why we will never know. Bush said himself there is NO CONNECTION between Bin Laden and Iraq, never was. Its a civil war going on in Iraq with the U.S. participating. Why would the terrorists there come here to fight it? How would they get here? On inflated innertubes? On rubber duckies? "