Now
Fair and Breezy
41°
High
55°
Low
26°

Business-ag coalition forms to oppose spending lid

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Friday, Oct 13, 2006 - 12:17:13 am CDT

A second coalition, representing business and agricultural groups, has formed to oppose Initiative 423, the state spending lid proposal on the November ballot.

The new coalition’s co-chairs represent three major statewide organizations: The Nebraska Chamber of Commerce, the Nebraska Farm Bureau and the Nebraska Realtors Association.

The proposed spending lid amendment would limit spending increases each year to inflation plus population growth.

The small business and taxpayers represented by the coalition believe in spending restraint, said Barry Kennedy of Lincoln, president of the Nebraska chamber.

But the spending controls should not be locked into the constitution, he said.

The business groups say they want a curb on government spending but haven’t offered any solution, said Mike Groene of North Platte, a spokesman for the lid supporters.

Their lobbyists are in Lincoln getting tax breaks for themselves, he said, pointing to business tax incentives and a valuation change that gives ag land a lower value.

“That helps them but doesn’t help the overall tax picture. We have to look at the big picture,” he said.

The two coalitions opposing the lid have similar names. The business group calls itself Nebraska Taxpayers against 423. A coalition representing many groups whose members use tax funds is called Nebraskans Against 423.

The two anti-lid coalitions include 75 organizations representing more than 400,000 members.

Members of both coalitions believe one likely result of the proposed spending lid would be increased property taxes, said Rob Robertson of Roca, a vice president with the Nebraska Farm Bureau.

Lid opponents also formed two separate groups to fight a tax lid amendment in 1998, Groene said.

“It’s the same MO this time,” he said.

Groups on both sides have raised more than $1.7 million, according to required reports to the state.

Lid supporters, organized as Stop OverSpending Nebraska, spent more than $700,000 to collect voter signatures needed to get the issue on the ballot.

Two groups — SOS and another pro-lid group formed by Omaha businessman Dave Nabity — also have reported spending about about $273,000 on the educational campaign so far.

Almost all the money raised by the two pro-lid groups has come from two groups with ties to Howard Rich, a wealthy New York real estate investor. The two groups, Americans for Limited Government and Fund for Democracy, also have helped pay for spending lid petition drives in other states.

Nebraskans Against 423, which began work this summer, reported raising more than $672,000 from its member organizations and individuals.

The biggest donors have been the League of Nebraska Municipalities (representing cities), $115,575; the Nebraska State Education Association, $119,616; and national AARP, $122,184.

The coalition has spent more than $662,000, primarily on an educational campaign.

The anti-lid coalition has been airing television ads for several weeks.

The pro-lid ads began Wednesday and will air for several weeks, Groene said.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Founding Fathers? wrote on October 13, 2006 7:18 am:
" Who supports 423? Some guy from New York and an implement dealer from North Platte......yeah, that's who I want writing the language that is going to be in our Constitution..... "

Jan wrote on October 13, 2006 8:41 am:
" I'm not sure if I support this or not but it's going to take more than some guy in New York is funding this so it must be bad in order for me not to vote for it. The problem is that now that people voted in term limits we are not going to have the expertise to manage and make cuts to the budget. I see it continuing to grow at a faster pace than before. One of those unintended consequences I think. I hope I'm wrong on that though. "

sam wrote on October 13, 2006 9:02 am:
" I am still concerned about the things that are not being said such as population numbers stay the same, but more kids in school, more seniors needing aid, more inmates in prison, etc. All of these are costs that raise every year, but population stays the same. If has not worked in other states, and I do not believe it will work here. "

Uh wrote on October 13, 2006 2:36 pm:
" Yeh, the lobbyists at getting their tax breaks. People from Colo. have told me that it does work there. Of course the leaders in Nebraska don't want a lid. My goodness they couldn't go whole hog to spend people to death and get what they want. Funny how my fixed income can keep going down and at the point of going bankrupt or moving to another state. And of course the citizens are going to be told "your property taxes will go up" if theres a lid. Well, I haven't seen them go down!!! The wool is being pulled over peoples faces, your property taxes ARE going up no matter WHAT!!! Wake up people. I wouldn't trust the Nebraska leadership anymore the the N.Y. guy. You vote for the lid and we'll put a gun to your back and raise you taxes, Take that!!! CHOICE, YOU NEBRASKANS HAVE NONE. "

Waaaaa wrote on October 13, 2006 7:32 pm:
" You're right, Duh. The wool is sure being pulled over your faces. There is a wolf in sheep's clothing behind this spending lid and he is sitting back in New York City enjoying the entertainment his $ can buy. If you don't like how money is being spent, YOU vote people in and out! You don't let some rich guy change our constitution. If you don't vote, then don't whine or complain your taxes are too high. If you want to make a difference, run for office. But, don't be a sheeple and follow the flock to disaster - vote against 423. Thank goodness there are a few Nebraskans who are independent thinkers and can see through this initiative. "

Resident of TAX HELL wrote on October 13, 2006 9:13 pm:
" I say vote for it and see if it works - if it doesn't then repeal it later. You talk about the "big money folks" sponsoring this initiative---how about all the folks with their hands stuck out for more of my tax dollars who are fighting it tooth and nail? I say let the chips fall where they may, my name is Ben from the family Dover in this state and I'm sick and tired of it. No kids in school, I drive very little on the roads and stay at home most of the time. I live out where I have very few state-provided amenities, yet I pay more in taxes (than my old house payment) for the privilege of living in a home I paid off years ago. Tell me what's fair about that. There are lots of people like me that are just keeping quiet right now. But we will all turn out to vote. "