Now
Fair
78°
High
83°
Low
68°

Another sign of long-term water worries

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Sunday, Oct 08, 2006 - 12:12:42 am CDT

Generous rain in recent weeks took southeastern Nebraska out of the drought zone. But the moisture really isn’t enough to assuage worries about global warming and permanent climate change.

And the dramatic declines in groundwater levels in Nebraska reported this week underlined the long-term problem that the state faces.

Since the current drought began in 2000, groundwater levels in parts of the state have dropped by more than 30 feet, reported Mark Burbach of the University of Nebraska’s School of Natural Resources.

This is an ominous trend for counties that depend heavily on irrigation, including those along the Platte River and Perkins, Chase and Dundy counties in southwestern Nebraska.

Agriculture in the state has become increasingly dependent on the water supplies in the Ogallala Aquifer, that immense underground reservoir of water that accumulated over centuries.

Large-scale irrigation began in Nebraska in the 1950s. As wet and dry cycles alternated since then, water tables in parts of Nebraska have fallen, only to recover somewhat in wet cycles.

But the long term trend is still in the wrong direction.

“We certainly aren’t coming to the bottom of the well, so to speak, but the level of groundwater declines in many parts of Nebraska are indisputable and could even be viewed as alarming,” Burbach said.

In southwest Nebraska and Box Butte County, groundwater levels have dropped more than 50 feet since large scale groundwater irrigation began.

Southeastern Nebraska may have become more sanguine as rain pelted down recently. But even though there were flood warnings for some of the state’s rivers, the overall picture didn’t improve much.

Actually, the state as a whole was in better shape a year ago. According to the National Drought Mitigation Center, about 9 percent of Nebraska was out of the drought zone last week. A year ago, the figure was about 13 percent. And this year, more than 30 percent of the state was experiencing extreme drought. A year ago, none of the state was.

Water policy in Nebraska is now based in theory on the premise that water usage should be sustainable.

Unfortunately, no one really knows what it will take to sustain groundwater levels.

It will be difficult enough to bring groundwater usage down to a level that will be sustainable based on historic rainfall totals.

But with every year that the drought continues, there is more doubt that historic rainfall totals are a reliable guide to the future.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial Main > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Noone wrote on October 8, 2006 5:59 am:
" Maybe some of the people with automatic underground sprinklers could cut back on watering their yards. Every morning I drive by the same houses that are still over watering just like they have been doing daily since early March. "

Allan wrote on October 8, 2006 7:20 am:
" The real tragedy is that many conservatives have long denied that global warming is a reality--preferring instead to burn carbon fuels in the most wasteful manner. Now that global warming has progressed so far, it appears that we must now prepare for the competition between those who wish to use our ground water for non-sustainable agriculture in the western part of the state and the growing human population in the eastern part of the state. We need to boot out the party-politics as usual crowd, and seek out new leaders who will look forward to a future for our children and grandchildren. "

Randy Ferlic, Regent wrote on October 8, 2006 7:51 am:
" "Permanent climate change" is an oxymoron and an absurdity! "

Roger wrote on October 8, 2006 8:17 am:
" 7 years of drought, 7 years of rain, while we have had an extended term, we will return to rain. Watch. "

whatever wrote on October 8, 2006 9:32 am:
" The number one threat to Nebraska's water supply is the continued population growth of Colorado. Colorado has minimal water supplies for it's population and many a business person would love to sell our water supplies to Colorado. "

no wrote on October 8, 2006 8:30 pm:
" The number one threat to Nebraska's water supply is the nearly 100,000 pivots atomizing 1000 gallons a minuter for months each year. "

Hugo wrote on October 9, 2006 3:17 am:
" For years, irrigation pumps withdrawing water that used to feed rivers and streams and recharge ground water sources. That water has been exported to corn and soybeans and the atmosphere faster than it has been replaced by rainfall and inflows from regional groundwater movement and streamflows. We are finally at a point where we notice this imbalance. This is no difference than our national debt catching up with us. We either have to get more or use less. I'm betting on using less, but hey, I'm conservative. "

Jody P. wrote on October 9, 2006 7:37 am:
" An earlier post is confused by the phrase "permanant climate change". Allow me to intervene. The word "permanent" here is describing a change which will last thousands or tens of thousands of years, as opposed to a short temporary cycle of only a few years. The earlier post seems to believe that the word "permanent" implies that the change would last billions of years until the end of the universe, but no, I'm sure that was not the intent of the editorial writer. "