Now
Fair
85°
High
87°
Low
67°

Zoning change would allow digital billboards in Lincoln

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By MATT OLBERDING/Lincoln Journal Star

Sunday, Oct 08, 2006 - 12:12:43 am CDT

Lincoln may soon join hundreds of other cities in allowing digital billboards.

A zoning change approved recently by the Lincoln-Lancaster County Planning Commission, would for the first time allow the signs in the city.

The change was sought by Lamar Outdoor Advertising, which  already uses digital technology on billboards in 44 states and wants to start using it in Lincoln, said General Manager Martha Lee Heyne.

Story Photo
Billboards like this digital display can change every few minutes to offer a variety of advertising options to clients. (Courtesy)

“It’s new technology that’s being used across the nation,” Heyne said.

The new technology that fuels the digital billboards is light emitting diodes, or LEDs, which are essentially little lightbulbs that are  used in everything from traffic lights to jumbo video screens, including Memorial Stadium’s HuskerVision screens.

The technology has been around for awhile, but has only been used on billboards for a few years. Lamar put its first one up in Baton Rouge, La., in 2001.

Lamar has significantly increased its deployment of the digital billboards in the past year. According to its most recent financial report, the company’s capital spending for the digital billboards increased to $37 million in the first six months of this year from $369,000 in the first six months of 2005.

Locally the LED technology has been used in on-premise signs for businesses such as convenience stores and fast-food restaurants.

But up to now local law has prohibited its use on billboards.

The advantage of the technology for Lamar and other billboard companies is that it allows multiple businesses to advertise daily on the same board, as opposed to traditional billboards, which accommodate only one advertiser for a period of weeks or months.

Allowing billboards to have electronic images does raise some issues, such as the distraction of motorists and the amount of light the sign emits.

The president of Scenic America, an anti-billboard group, has called them “10 times worse” than traditional billboards.

But the city and Lamar worked to address many concerns with new language in the zoning ordinance.

For instance, don’t expect to see scrolling messages or mini-commercials.

The zoning change will require the billboards to keep the images stationary for at least 10 seconds. That means no video or other animation.

The 10-second hold, along with a requirement that the digital billboards be at least 5,000 feet apart are taken right out of state law governing the billboards along highways, said Planning Director Marvin Krout.

The new boards also will have to meet brightness standards and be turned off between midnight and 5 a.m.

While the boards’ main function will be commercial advertising, they can and will be used to broadcast public service announcements and emergency information, such as Amber Alerts, Heyne said.

The zoning change still must be approved by the City Council, and Heyne said the company hasn’t formalized any plans for when or how many of the digital billboards will go up.

“We’re going to transition to these based on market demand,” she said.

Krout said it was his understanding that the company planned to try out four to six and then expand if they are successful.

The digital boards can go up on existing structures, so new billboard locations will not be necessary.

However, the company does have a “bank” of credits earned for billboards taken down, so it will be able to add a few new locations if it chooses.

After the credits are used up, the company will have to take down three billboards for every new digital one it puts up.

But that will still be  net gain for Lamar, as Heyne said each board will have up to six advertisers.

While the change will be a big one for Lincoln and some people will not like it, no one spoke in opposition to it at the Planning Commission hearing and Heyne said she has heard no complaints.

Krout said he was initially skeptical but now is OK with the change.

He said he was impressed with Lamar digital billboards he studied in the Kansas City area.

“I think it’s crisp and good looking,” he said. “But it will be different.”

Reach Matt Olberding at 473-2647 or molberding@journalstar.com.

 


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Business > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Marvin wrote on October 8, 2006 5:07 am:
" How does one study billboards in Kansas City area, steak, lobster, and fine wine? And the sign credits are hardly earned; they are a subsidy from the Ladybird Johnson’s great society that the taxpayers are still being gouged for. Oh, perfect place for one of the new signs would be at 44th and Cornhusker. Woo Woo "

Chef wrote on October 8, 2006 5:42 am:
" The article does not mention lumen-output. Nobody likes living next to a too bright light source. However LED technology when used properly can actually create a "flat" light image that emits no additional ambient light. Lincoln Journal Star and the LIED center are not particularly flat and tend to emit additional ambient light. "

I hope not! wrote on October 8, 2006 1:19 pm:
" Digital signs are a distraction. I remember these signs all to well when I lived in California. Drivers tend to slow down to wait for the change! At night the light from Digital signs can cause glare. Stick to the old fashioned Bilboard sign. It's not broken so lets not fix it. "

Mind Pollution wrote on October 9, 2006 5:57 am:
" Bombarded with visua; clutter and polullution of the clear sies Nebraskans love? Will lighted annoyance will replace a clean look and distract drivers? Maybe tighten the "down time so there are at least eight hours of reprieve for citizens? "

Grandpa wrote on October 9, 2006 6:10 am:
" Tax this unnecessray annoyance as we do "sin" taxes which may be a burden on the eyes and have negative collateral effects on our city. The liberties of people and the community should not be infringed on with visual attacks or a blatant occupation replacing our clear views. Consumers can seek information, they need not be bombarded with excesses. Tax this to build revenue from property that has income potential the extra the digital billboards increased to $37 million in the first six months of this year from $369,000 in the first six months of 2005, unlike retirees who are just getting by. "

Andy wrote on October 9, 2006 8:42 am:
" Digital Billboards...hmmm...sounds like another advancement that some will just complain about instead of looking for positive, productive ways to use the new technology. Extra taxes is one way to go...but more than likely the community would never see anything productive from that money. I would prefer to see these new boards used to inform the community about upcoming events, public meetings and as a way for some of Lincoln's non-profit organizations to get some face time in Lincoln. Of course all of this would have to be offset by blatant advertising, but at least we'd get something beneficial from it as well. Write it up, I'll support it. "

BC. wrote on October 9, 2006 9:10 am:
" What happened to the federal law that was to get rid of billboards? (federal highway beatification act) It kept Beatrice from placing small banner 3' x 2' banner signs along their main st yet the large signs are ok? "

Kelly wrote on October 9, 2006 3:47 pm:
" I have seen these signs first hand. They are clean and crisp as Mr. Krout has alluded to as there is not hanging paper from a deteriorating ad. The LED lit board produces far less light than the old style board. I think that the bottom line will mean fewer new structures by better utilizing what is in place. We should not bury our heads in the sand every time a new technology comes along. Lets be "pro business" here in Lincoln. "

Duble Whew wrote on October 9, 2006 5:26 pm:
" beautification act just limits them I think, and they are not building new billboards. they are REPLACING the existing ones with new technology. i saw the meeting on TV. And Chef is right, they reported the digitals emit less light than regular billboards, so it will be a good thing for Lincoln and other communities. i'm all about helping local businesses attract visitors to spend their money right here in Lincoln - we need to stay pro-business so there is more revenue coming in from LINCOLN BUSINESSES and less from our PROPERTY TAXES. i'm tired of being taxed more and more on my property. if we were pro-business and attracting more businesses to Lincoln we'd have more revenue coming in to help alleviate our tax burden. bonus - they can do Amber Alerts when a kid goes missing before a kidnapper can even get out of the area. how can that be a bad thing? "

seen it wrote on October 9, 2006 5:41 pm:
" There is one of these owned by Lamar at the first exit on I-29 north of I-80 in Council Bluffs if you go east, away from Ameristar casino. I saw it today, and it is pretty darn bright! Once in place, they can change the rules instantly with a new Council/Mayor...then look out...video/endless Ricketts-type negative ads...yeesh! "