Now
Fair
64.0°
High
87°
Low
64°

Mixed reviews for system

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Tuesday, Sep 26, 2006 - 12:13:05 am CDT

LPS' new $1.8 million printing system promised to turn around any job teachers sent there by bright and early the next morning. In the first month, there have been a fair amount of paper jams.

BY MARGARET REIST | Lincoln Journal Star

They’ve done away with the fax machines, ink jet printers and dinosaur-era copiers.  They’ve put in fancy new machines that print and fax and copy at the push of a button.

Story Photo
New paper is loaded into a copy machine at the Lincoln Public Schools Print Center. New this year, the LPS Print Center completes 700-800 jobs daily for all the schools in the district. (Gwyneth Roberts)

Lincoln Public Schools employees who know their way around giant copying machines have set up shop in the district offices: the hub of a new $1.8 million printing system that promised to turn around any job teachers sent there by bright and early the next morning.

And in the first month of school, there’s been a fair amount of paper jams.

“It’s been a rough start,” said LPS Purchasing Director Dwayne Odvody.

A larger-than-anticipated demand the week before school started and during the first week of classes meant delays in getting orders to teachers — sometimes as long as a week — and a print shop staff that had to work overtime and weekends to try to keep up.

Breakdowns of the print shop machines during that time — one for more than a day — added to problems.

Sometimes, teachers said, they never got their orders. Some teachers haven’t received tests the day they’d told students they should be prepared. At times, orders have gone to the wrong school.

The delays at times have forced teachers to change lesson plans at the last minute, which means being less prepared for a class of 30 students staring at you from their desks.

“In teaching, you don’t have inconveniences,” said East High English teacher Dutch Fichthorn. “It’s a disaster.”

Fichthorn recalls one day not getting the materials he’d ordered and having to search the Internet for similar materials, then printing it off at school. That’s a more expensive option for the schools. And it means having less time for lesson planning.

“In teaching lingo we call that a punt strategy,” he said. That’s easier for veteran teachers, but still not the best scenario.

District administrators and other staff helped out in the print shop and by the end of the second week of school, it was largely caught up, Odvody said.

“We’re back up to speed on daily delivery time,” he said. “What we’re working on now is maintaining that.”

Part of that is making sure teachers understand how to use the system and are comfortable doing it, Odvody said.

New system to save money, update machines

Last year, LPS signed a five-year contract with Xerox to manage the new system, after having piloted it last fall at two elementaries, one middle school and one high school.

At the end of the pilot project in December, the district started getting all schools on board, getting rid of 1,805 copiers, fax machines, printers and updated mimeograph devices in faculty rooms, classrooms and offices. They put 505 new Xerox machines in their places. 

Of those, 303 are of the multi-tasking variety: copying, faxing and printing. The district also added 200 new printers. 

To move to the new system, LPS paid $828,000 to get out of existing lease agreements, a cost included in the Xerox contract and one officials hope the district will make back in lower costs.

Their hope, Odvody said last fall, was to save about $450,000 a year by reducing the per-copy price. That amount includes the cost of replacing old machines, something the district hadn’t been able to do regularly with the old system.

In real dollars, he said, the savings will be closer to $250,000.

But money wasn’t the only reason for the change, Odvody said.

Officials wanted to get rid of outdated machines that were inefficient and broke down frequently and to create a system that could keep up with existing demand. They also wanted to save teachers time by having a central print shop do most of the work, and give them better copies and more options. 

The system allows — and encourages — teachers to send orders via computer. That means they can request copies from home if they want. And at some point, Odvody said, teachers should be able to store materials in computers rather than in file cabinets.

“This was, if you will, a paradigm shift, a different approach,” he said.

Although teachers say the new system is working better now, deliveries still don’t always get to them  on time.

It’s stressful to send anything to the print shop because you don’t know when you’re going to get it back,  said East High oral communications teacher Matt Davis.

He also questioned what will happen if the LPS Internet system goes down, since that’s how orders are processed now.

 “It’s like a lottery system,” Davis said. “Sometimes you win, sometimes you come up with craps. It’s like rolling the dice.”

LPS makes 91 million copies, faxes a year

Undoubtedly, the task of managing LPS paper is daunting: The district makes about 91 million copies and faxes a year.

The print shop was expected to do much but not all of that work, with officials estimating it would make between 4 million and 6 million copies a month.

Demand in the first three weeks of school surpassed the 6 million mark, but Odvody said it’s too early to know if that pace will continue.

“We knew the start of the school year would be huge but it exceeded our expectation,” he said.

Adding to the demand is some curriculum materials that need to be printed off the Internet, Odvody said. 

Print shop employees worked around the clock and on weekends to reduce a growing backlog. When machines went on the blink, Xerox personnel printed some jobs at other locations at no extra charge.

“We had a couple of machines that went on the blink at a time when we really needed to get the volume down and out the door,” said Odvody.

Still, some school administrators are optimistic early problems will be worked out.

“Any change is rough,” said Clinton Principal Mona Manley. “It continues to go smoother and smoother as we become more comfortable with it.”

Maxey Elementary Principal Pat Decker said his teachers had no problems, in part because the school was one of the pilot locations and teachers became proficient last year. One benefit is that the system frees them from standing in line at the copy machine, he said.

“For us, it’s going really well,” he said. “We’re able to ship 85 percent of our photocopying to the print shop.”

District officials say it will take a full year to know whether the savings estimates are right.

This year, though, some schools experienced sticker shock when they got statements showing the cost of copying so far, compared with what they’d been charged in previous years.

The costs are higher than before, Odvody said, in part because they’re figured differently. Now, the the per-cost copy assessed to schools includes such other costs as equipment replacement previously absorbed by the district. But schools will see savings because they no longer have to buy things like ink cartridges and toner.

District officials are trying to refigure budgets so schools will have additional money to pay those costs.

In the meantime, they’ll keep working at getting teachers what they want when they want it.

“We are very determined to make this as smooth as it can be,” Odvody said.

Reach Margaret Reist at 473-7226 or mreist@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Extras > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Green wrote on September 26, 2006 6:54 am:
" Where the "clickers" and initiatives to become less reliant on paper? Didn't we just read that UNL isusing technology LPS could be using in classrooms? "

chode wrote on September 26, 2006 7:22 am:
" LPS has a 1.8 million dollar printing system and all they can do is whine and moan about it? "

ted wrote on September 26, 2006 7:50 am:
" They'll just raise our taxes again to pay for their bad managment. LPs does not respect local taxpayers. "

Audrey wrote on September 26, 2006 7:51 am:
" I applaud the two teachers in the article for speaking out and telling the truth about the new system. I live it every day and am appalled at the inefficiencies and errors produced by the printing system. As a taxpayer and employee of LPS, I am disappointed my tax dollars are being spent on such an inefficient system and as an employee I am insulted the school district is asking me to trust an already proven unreliable system for planning my classroom activities. In addition, district officials have mandated a happy-go-lucky attitude towards the system giving the "Oh well!" when the machines break down or copies aren't delivered as promised. The public should be outraged. Students are being shortchanged and in the end, that's the true price of their new 'system'. "

Jon wrote on September 26, 2006 7:57 am:
" It's unfortunate that LPS did not admit in this article that costs per copy increased this year because no one figured the cost of paper in the original Xerox contract. What genius signs a contract with Xerox and thinks the 91 million copies per year will be free???? "

Mike wrote on September 26, 2006 8:00 am:
" When I heard about this system last year I knew it had disaster written all over it. The logistical side is just too much. How hard was it before? The teacher clicks print, goes to the office picks up the print job. Now the teacher clicks send, and three weeks later it shows up in the interco mail. Those Xerox sales people must be able to sell refrigerators to Eskimos. Fire the admin person the pushed this idea as a cost savings. "

fathead Neuman wrote on September 26, 2006 8:38 am:
" This is a five year contract. If it doesn't save enough money to pay for itself over five years, then the administrator(s) that got LPS into it should be either repremanded or fired. Any other very large organization would do no less, and as I tax payer I expect as much or more. But lets get one thing straight here: LPS is a great school system. Even if they made some poor choices here, in the end they still provide a good education. "

Genius wrote on September 26, 2006 8:39 am:
" Nice job of screwing the taxpayer and the students LPS! This is a typical example of spending inefficiently and mismanaging the outcomes. The 'what, me worry?' attitude is just vile. This is our money you're spending. I'd like to see you held more accountable than the current corrupt bureaucracy standards that are in place for you. Did anyone ever think about networking all the LPS systems? Did anyone ever consider having students take server based tests? Ever consider cutting back on your paper usage, helping the environment and saving some trees and LOT of taxpayer money at the same time? No. I didn't think so. You're happy just to continue screwing us over and spend like there's no tomorrow all while getting our property taxes raised. "

Mike wrote on September 26, 2006 9:04 am:
" It was interesting that in the story the only two individuals who were supportive of the system were administrators. I understand that when you (Margaret) contact teachers they are reluctant to speak on the record for fear of retribution. This should tell you something about how the leadership of this district conducts itself. "

Arkum wrote on September 26, 2006 9:06 am:
" All LPS machines are networked. There are server based tests, but not used as the only testing method, or the primary one. "

Jackson wrote on September 26, 2006 9:53 am:
" What a joke this printing debacle is! Nobody is even mentioning gas and vehicle money to cart copies all over town to schools that could just have easily printed them in their own building. Even if it did cost a little more to print in the building (which in the end I bet this system costs more) it is worth it to print in buildings to pay for the convenience and for teachers to have tests when they need them, otherwise it is wasted school periods. This is the problem with LPS, they don't just spend money, they throw money around with no accountability. No public service administrator should be able to afford a luxury car, and the fact that they do shows they are frivolous spenders. "

Janelle wrote on September 26, 2006 10:35 am:
" Teachers are fed up with the "party line" being sent by the district. I have stopped sending print work to the LPS Print Center because most of the time it is either printed wrong or sent to the wrong building. We've never received an explanation for this. I notice the article doesn't mention that the person they picked to run the LPS Print Center is the husband of a high level LPS administrator and the brother of the superintendents secretary. Is that a coincidence? "

mike Wiese wrote on September 26, 2006 11:29 am:
" "There is no accountability for administrators, not city, state or federal. They slap each other on the back and act like it is a complete success no matter how bad the out come. "

Chuck Moorehead wrote on September 26, 2006 1:05 pm:
" These people are responsible for teaching our children! I am very very concerned where LPS management wnt to school! Up will go our property taxes; you can bet on that!!! "

Curt wrote on September 26, 2006 1:41 pm:
" To everyone who voted for the last school bond issue this is what you voted for and worse. The administration and union leaders are having a good laugh at the expense of the gullible electorate. All they have to say is that it is for children and they get a pass. Just remember you have the best school board the union can afford. "

Rachael wrote on September 26, 2006 3:12 pm:
" This is the kind of thing that looks efficient and like it will save money on paper, but ends up being a disaster. While decentralized methods may cost more, what they save in convenience is common sense. "

D.A. wrote on September 26, 2006 4:07 pm:
" ...if LPS can afford to pay $828,000.00 to get out of a lease agreement, then they have way too much money and we as taxpayers should be outraged. Waste like this has been going on way too long. Why is it the Ciy's budget is put under the microscope when it takes .15 of every tax dollar and LPS is the sow that eats .65 cents of every dollar. Something is terribly wrong. "

KD wrote on September 26, 2006 4:41 pm:
" Board members should be notified by those of you with concerns; the comments here are thoughtful and a way to initiate conservative change that is needed when the district is failing. "

john dewright wrote on September 26, 2006 6:13 pm:
" There should be a full investigation into this fiasco. Dwayne Odvody's finances over the past two to three years should be investigated to make sure this deal was done the right way. From what I understand, a couple LPS employees left or were asked to leave over this matter. Who in their right mind would think that this system would work??? Somebody who was paid to think it would! In the end...the taxpayers will pay dearly for this. "

Ron wrote on September 26, 2006 6:22 pm:
" Just one more word from a forced to be user of this system. As an LPS teacher, let me share that from my opinion and experience, this system is not good for helping to educate Lincoln students. I work very hard to plan lessons and activities that are age appropriate, in order for students to learn the curriculum that LPS says I'm to teach. Arriving at school, hoping to receive the material I ordered, only to find it didn't arrive or it was printed incorrectly, doesn't make for the best learning opportunities for students. I must make new plans, find something different, or obviously make some adjustments. I know making adjustments is part of teaching, but when one has no control over receiving material on time or at all is very discouraging. It wouldn't be too bad if that only happened once or twice but..........As for Curt's comments, this system was already in the mix and on its way before the bond issue. There isn't any connection Curt. "

JB wrote on September 26, 2006 8:29 pm:
" Wasting taxpayer money??? Saving $250,000-$450,000 is a waste of money??? Wake up people!!! By the way, LPS already has trucks going to every school to make deliveries, the copies just ride along with the trucks already making the trip. I love how citizens of Lincoln jump to conclusions based on one article that's missing lots of important details. Is the system perfect? No. But it's only been in place a short period of time. Any project this big takes a bit of time to work out all the kinks! "

Jackson wrote on September 26, 2006 9:51 pm:
" LPS administrators are concerned about two things: first, how to make their paychecks bigger and second, how to make their paychecks bigger. How many administrators were working overtime making copies for their teachers in their time of need? NONE. Far be it from an administrator to do anything but JUDGE a teacher. Let's put this experience in LPS's summative goals and maybe next year their goal will be to have a 70% on time accurate delivery rate. What if teachers were so lax about delivery of instruction? They'd be fired! LPS admins - get off your duffs and do something helpful for once! "

Story question wrote on September 26, 2006 10:35 pm:
" Q: If LPS loses a one-time payment of $828,000 to break out of 5-year contracts in order to pay $450,000 less per year, how many years will it take to recoup the losses? A (apparently): If LPS can afford to pay $828,000.00 to get out of a lease agreement, then they have way too much money and we as taxpayers should be outraged. Also acceptable A: (cost of entirely decentralize printing system)~ ( cost of centralized printing system + the unknown "inconvenience" costs of a centralized printing system) > anticipated costs of centralized printing system; where Years of Operation < 3. For Years of Operation >= 3; (cost of centralized printing facility for adequately pre-planned printings + cost of limited stop-gap measures for last minute print jobs) < cost of entirely decentralized printing system. Even more incorrect answer: 1.84 years "

Andrew Bargen wrote on September 26, 2006 11:37 pm:
" Curtis asked "When was the last time you attended a school board meeting to discuss what should be done?", and I agree with your sentiment, but only to a point. There is a reason that we elect people to specialized offices in this country--we trust them to be worthy stewards of our money and interests. I agree that people should be involved, but to suggest that the average citizen could walk in off the street and give an informed opinion about the most efficient allocation of printing funds out of the LPS budget is probably over the top. These elected officials are supposed to have the expertise to make wise decisions in the use of taxpayer dollars. And when evidence comes to light that that may not be the case, then it is the taxpayer's duty to hold their feet to the fire. "