Now
Fair
79°
High
86°
Low
65°

Investigator keeps an eye out for online predators

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By LORI PILGER / Lincoln Journal Star

Sunday, Sep 24, 2006 - 12:38:22 am CDT

As they chatted online, the men might have imagined what the 15-year-old looked like.

They might have pictured a pretty blond girl, maybe a brunette.

Ed Sexton’s smooth bald head and the bristling whiskers of his mustache almost certainly didn’t come to mind.

Story Photo
Ed Sexton takes apart a computer for an investigation in this April 2002 file photo. (LJS file)

But on the Internet, you can be whoever you say you are, and Sexton’s chat profile says he’s a 15-year-old girl in Lincoln.

The last part’s right.

Sexton is a police investigator in Lincoln who this summer busted three men he says tried to meet him for sex when he posed online as an underage girl.

The arrests, although few, highlight a danger young people face, said Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning.

“There are Internet predators surfing the Web right now looking for our children,” he said. “Right here in Lincoln, Nebraska, all across the state, this kind of thing is happening. And it’s a scary situation.”

Last year nearly one in seven Internet users ages 10 to 17 received unwanted sexual solicitations, and one in three saw sexual material they didn’t intend to see, according to a 2006 national study funded through a grant to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

“They have to navigate some pretty treacherous waters out there,” said Col. Bryan Tuma, of the Nebraska State Patrol.

After watching a Nebraska State Patrol demonstration a little more than a year ago, Sarpy County Attorney Lee Polikov said, he left feeling guilty his county had not done anything. The statistics were appalling, he said, but he guessed they may be even higher.

“You cannot go into one of those chat rooms with any kind of indication that you’re a minor child and not be solicited. It happens in numbers, large numbers,” Polikov said.

Soon after, his office formed a working group, pulling together law enforcement investigators and his staff. They’ve trained and made arrests. They have four open cases now, he said.

Some have argued it’s entrapment or a freedom of speech violation, but Polikov is confident Nebraska’s child enticement law can stand up, as it has in other states.

At a WebSafe conference Friday in Lincoln, police officers and prosecutors trained to help them identify online predators and prosecute the cases.

“There are so many predators out there that sometimes it feels like we’re not making a dent,” Bruning said. “But we’ve got to continue prosecuting these cases because I’m convinced there’s a deterrent effect.”

That’s why he thinks it’s important to spread the word to the “bad guys.”

“They will know that we’re out there looking and that they have a significant chance of bumping into law enforcement when they think they’re bumping into 13-year-old Becky,” Bruning said. “That’s a big part of this.”

Another part is getting the word to parents and letting them know it’s OK to do such things as put the family computer in the living room and use monitoring software, he said.

“Parents, teachers, law enforcement officers, we all have a role to play,” Bruning said.

In a police interview room this summer, Sexton said, it’s not like the “Dateline” hidden-camera investigations where as many as 51 men around the country show up to allegedly have sex with teens after chatting with people who are in fact from a news show.

Arrests rarely come so quickly and right in a row, like they did over the past few months, he said, mostly because he’s not in chat rooms full-time.

“Part of it’s just timing.”

Sexton has taken training to learn the lingo and how teenagers chat. But mostly he just waits. It may take a few minutes or a few months for someone to approach, looking for sex with an underage girl, and take steps to follow through.

The things some say they want to do would make many parents of 15-year-olds blush. If the would-be perpetrators take an overt act to follow through, like driving to a park to meet, authorities arrest them.

That’s what police say happened last Monday evening about 8:15 at University Place Park. According to court records, a young-looking officer in plain clothes, walked up to Shane A. Brown’s car. Police say the 33-year-old Lincoln man said he was Denny, the name he’d used in online chats, where he made it known he was interested in having sex with the underage girl.

On Aug. 1, police say, the same thing happened, only that time, the man used his own name. Thirteen minutes into a chat, 32-year-old Chiranjib Banerjee allegedly made his intentions known, according to the affidavit for his arrest. He arranged to meet a 15-year-old at Belmont Plaza, then went there. Police arrested him within minutes.

A week earlier, Sexton’s online chats with another Lincoln man, 34-year-old Daniel J. Madsen, culminated in a meeting and arrest at Bethany Park.

They’d chatted, off and on, since May 30, Sexton said in the affidavit for Madsen’s arrest. A young officer agreed to be a decoy and walked up to Madsen’s car. Police say he was exposing himself, and the officer took a picture.

The three recent cases — Brown, who is set to return to court Oct. 12; Madsen, who is set for trial next month; and Banerjee who is set for preliminary hearing this month — aren’t the norm, Sexton said.

There’s a trend making the people who follow through more cautious, he said. They know law enforcement is on the Internet, impersonating young kids, and they’re changing their tactics.

“And it’s making it more difficult for us,” Sexton said.

It may mean fewer underage victims, he said, but a lot of them are willing victims.

That’s where parents come in.

Sexton said parents should educate their children about the dangers of meeting people online and should make sure they understand what can happen if they do.

He’s got mixed feelings when it comes to young people and instant messaging.

It’s a method of communication being used more and more in business. For young people to keep up, they’re going to need to know how it works, Sexton said.

“On the other side of it though, you’ve got kids who do this unsupervised, and the parents don’t know what’s going on,” he said.

That makes it easier for predators to find kids, to groom them and, ultimately, to meet them for sex, Sexton said.

Really there’s not a lot that’s new on the Internet, he said.

“It just expands the pool of victims, that’s what it does.”

Reach Lori Pilger at 473-7237 or lpilger@journalstar.com.

By the numbers

Lincoln police have arrested five men on allegations of enticing a child with a computer since the law went into effect in April 2004.

This summer, police arrested three men, two within a week, after they chatted online with someone they thought was a 15-year-old girl. In fact, it was Police Investigator Ed Sexton.

In 2005, three men were arrested on the same allegation.

For more information about the dangers and how to surf safer, go to tcs.cybertipline.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
connie wrote on September 24, 2006 6:21 am:
" Entrapment has ALWAYS bothered me. Entrapment is when law enforcement induces someone into criminal conduct they wouldn't have entered into otherwise, and sadly, it happens all the time and is fairly difficult to prove. When it IS proved, the offending officer(s) get a lecture from the judge. THIS is not entrapment!!, nor is it a freedom of speech violation like the henderson case. None of these sickos are arrested for what they wrote on the 'net, until they actually show up to put their perversion into practice! Police officers are allowed by law to lie to a suspect in order to get a confession,(that's always bothered me too, except for cases like these) and I don't see that this is any different. Showing up to meet who they believed to be a minor, for the purpose of sex, is tantamount to a confession of, "yes, I AM a child predator" Bruning is absolutely correct in saying that the pool of them is so large, that the biggest effect this is going to have is making so many arrests in this fashion, that it becomes dangerous for the rest to set up meetings this way. Parents, I KNOW you think that you've educated your kids, and that they are safe because they know the dangers! NEVER underestimate the power of the it-can't-happen-to-me mindset of nearly all teens. Computer monitoring software is invaluable, and if you have a problem 'spying' on your kids (and I hope you don't, it's part of the job), just TELL them you've installed it, and you ARE going to use it because you're in charge of this little paradise they live in. They won't like it, but it's not spying if they know about it! We owe a huge debt of gratitude to the LPD, Ed Sexton, and others like him, for being vigilant in keeping our teens safe. The three sickos arrested, due to their efforts, in just a few months, gets them out of play, and sends a loud message to the rest, "we're watching you, and we'll eventually get you too!" THANKS, investigator Sexton, and LPD! "

Keep it up! wrote on September 24, 2006 8:23 am:
" Thanks for keeping our kids safe! We have to keep these sickos off the streets (and the Intranet)! Job well done! "

JJ wrote on September 24, 2006 11:01 am:
" I do agree with Connie statement about "Entrapment" and it does bother me alot. Our court system gives the right to confront the accuser which is someone posing as a child in this instance is enough to have the case thrown out because there is no child involved and therefore there is no enticement to lure a child to meet for sex which is wrong for any adult to do. I do agree that there are more pedophiles out there and they need to be taken off the streets so our can be safe. There has to be a better way to do get them off the streets and away from kids but entrapment is not the answer and I had always thought law is about truth and justice but entrapment does not fall into this catagory at all. What we need is a MOD SQUAD of kids to do this kind of work with a watchful eyes of several officers to oversee the kids work and to seek out those sickos and get the arrests made and have the courts do thier jobs, all done within legal limits. I do have a suggestion and may sound a bit far fetched but it would make our kids more safer:LETS FIND A REMOTE FAR AWAY ISLAND AND GIVE THOSE OFFENDERS A ONE WAY TICKET TO IT AND TELL THEM NEVER TO RETURN. Banishment is the only way to make it more safer for our children since the justice system does fail us at times when thier are sympthetic judges won't sentence an offender because he is to short to survive in prison and I think she should have been sentence to prison and see how long she would survive because of the injustice she done for probation she gave to that offender. "

Entrapment ?? wrote on September 24, 2006 11:16 am:
" Who cares about entrapment ??? If it works ..do it ! Thanks to all involved !!! "

JPC wrote on September 24, 2006 11:29 am:
" A huge Thank You, and job well done to all of the men and women who are out there trying to keep our community a safe place. "

Minority report stinks wrote on September 24, 2006 12:32 pm:
" This is enforcing the fact that it is a crime to plan a crime. If you were planning on robbing a bank and showed up outside, you could be arrested before you actually robbed the bank. It is probably difficult to prove your intentions in a court of law, but nonetheless, the police have to make an arrest if they have some indications that you do intent to commit a crime. This kind of thing would be completely unnecessary if kids weren't stupid enough to meet people form internet in person. Teach your kids to be skeptical of all information they find online, especially anything typed by another chatter or IMer. "

clarification wrote on September 24, 2006 5:42 pm:
" I SAID that cases like this are NOT entrapment!!! Read my whole comment. Connie "

Keep the kids safe wrote on September 24, 2006 8:29 pm:
" There needs to be more people to step up and tackle this issue because its more and more evident that its easy to prey on child now with internet communication so widely used by children. "

terms defined wrote on September 24, 2006 10:25 pm:
" perhaps before anyone jumps on the entrapment bus, you should look up the definition as it applies to law enforcement...perhaps a bit of education and your comments would make more sense and more worthy of reading. "

cjmajor wrote on September 24, 2006 10:43 pm:
" I know when my kids are old enough to go into chat rooms, I will definitly install something to "spy" on my kids, and yes I will tell them I am doing so. Some may disagree but every parent has there own ideas ways of raising there little ones. In my opinion no is right or wrong whether they "spy" or not, but i will for sure. "