Now
Fair
49°
High
76°
Low
52°

Enhancing clarity at HHS seems doable

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 - 12:09:15 am CDT

It’s too early for sweeping conclusions on the overall merits of Gov. Dave Heineman’s plan to reorganize the Health and Human Services System.

But the plan seems likely to succeed on one important goal — making the sprawling bureaucracy more understandable to Nebraskans, especially those who need to find services.

That’s a significant issue.

One of the first things a consumer who needs answers about Medicaid or services for military veterans or mental illness does is pick up the phone book.

The list of offices is bewildering. What does the Department of Services do, exactly? And what about the Department of Finance and Support?

By comparison ,the organization chart presented by Heineman offers the basis for phone listings that actually might guide consumers to someone who could help them.

That point was not lost on Pat Snyder, executive director of the Nebraska Health Care Association, who said that naming a department for the services it provides — for example, the proposed Department of Children and Family Services and the proposed Department of Veterans’ Homes — might make easier to find the right phone number.

For about the past decade, the system has been governed by a committee called the Policy Cabinet. That organizational framework had many critics. Kathy Moore, director of Voices for Children, said the framework left the system “rudderless.” Another advocate, Carol Stitt of the foster care review agency, said, “There is a very serious need to clarify who has responsibility and accountability.”

The organizational chart proposed by Heineman follows a traditional hierarchical approach, with a single CEO appointed by the governor. Six department heads, also appointed by the governor, would report to the CEO.

Heineman said the “chain of command” would make clear where responsibility rests.

He also said that by creating a single budget it will be easier to understand how taxpayer money is being spent.

Many of the changes proposed by Heineman require legislative action, so it’s quite possible his proposals could be modified before they are put into place.

He already has the authority to appoint a CEO. Heineman said he plans to name someone to the post by Jan. 1, and he hopes the other changes can take place by July 1 of next year.

Implementing organizational change is frequently a difficult process. But in this case there seems to be widespread recognition, even within the department, that some restructuring is needed. And even if the benefits don’t extend much beyond making the government easier to understand for consumers and taxpayers, it probably still would be worth trying.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial Main > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Rod wrote on August 29, 2006 6:22 am:
" Rather than reorganize the HHS, why not rebuild it? There are so many problems in HHS reorganization will NEVER address. Its time to start over from the ground up. "

connie wrote on August 29, 2006 8:26 am:
" I agree with Rod. Certainly, this re-orginization is a step in the right direction, but it's not enough. HHS is just in too much of a mess to straighten out. I think they should wholly separate each division, and give each a different head. The services covered under the heading HHS, are simply too diverse to manage properly within one department, no matter how you try to organize them! "

todd wrote on August 29, 2006 9:29 am:
" Appointing seven heads may alone create worry, promote cronnyism and infect the system with blatant partisan influence. Professionals, recruited and screened by a process may provide for greater stability and filling of positions by people who have more experience than when filled by rubber stamp selection. The ploy appeals to many because the system has eroded and the governor failed to hold people accountable; ACCOUNTABILITY EXISTS IN THE PRESENT SYSTEM BUT THE GOVERNOR HASN'T TAKEN THE REIGNS AND SHOWN LEADERSHIP WHEN IT WAS NEEDED. A new organizational chart may change the outward appearance, but it will not change lack of focus demonstrated by That is where citizens play a role in this mess and change of personnel in the governor's office is the most prudent first step for renewing Hope for HHS. the CEO of the state...Heineman. "

Oren wrote on August 29, 2006 12:34 pm:
" I agree with Todd. Seems the CEO of the state - Heineman plans to play tidlewinks with the phone book for the next 4 years. Maybe he should have a big "study" to figure out who his CEO is and how he jossels the employees in his perfect organizational chart. Frankly, I've given up hope that there is any Nebraskan intelligent enough to even be Governor. Kinda like, go to the polls and play darts. "

Robert James wrote on August 29, 2006 8:29 pm:
" Yet another government organization err reorganization. Come on folks its not hard to find what part of the agency does what for whom. Simply stop by any HHSS office and ask. Every front line staff member knows exactly who to call for what benefit and takes that single application to determine if a family, or person is eligible for what services. What could be simpler - "

Robert Olsom wrote on August 31, 2006 9:47 pm:
" Who is thi new CEO? Could It be Senator JIm Jensen? "