Now
Overcast
75.0°
High
86°
Low
68°

State cars use E10 no matter what the price

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Monday, Aug 07, 2006 - 12:12:58 am CDT

Driving has been even more expensive this summer for the fervent  fans of ethanol, the folks who always fill up with an ethanol blend no matter the price. That includes state government. 

For much of the past five years, E10 ethanol blend has sold for less than regular unleaded across the state.

But the two fuels reversed positions in early spring. And at many stations, E10 blend was selling for about a dime a gallon above unleaded regular for much of the spring and summer.

Story Photo
(LJS File)

The E85 blend also climbed to above $3 a gallon: It was $3.79 a gallon at one Lincoln station for a while.

And the state paid $3.17 a gallon for E85 several months ago, the last time it bought it in bulk, said Steve Sulek, administrator for transportation services.

That’s expensive for a fuel that generally cuts efficiency by 8 percent to 20 percent.

In fact, Gov. Dave Heineman  put saving money above promoting economic development when E85  hit a summer high last month.

Nebraska corn is used to make ethanol, which is then used to make the blends that state leaders have historically promoted.

Heineman’s administrative services staff sent a memo reminding employees who drive the 690 state-owned flexible fuel cars that they should buy whatever is cheapest between E10 and E85.

Though the memo is not that specific, employees can take into account the lower fuel economy  for E85 blend when buying gas, Sulek said.

However, the governor stuck to the state’s 26-year-old ethanol-only policy.

Governors since Charles Thone in 1980 have required employees who drive cars in the state fleet to always use an ethanol blend, no matter the price.

Only the Nebraska State Patrol is an exception to the ethanol blend-only  rule — an exception carved out in state law. 

So the patrol, which tells troopers to buy the cheapest gas, saved about $22,000 for the four months when E10 pump prices were generally a dime more than regular.

The rest of state government  would have likely saved about $20,000 this summer if employees had switched to regular gasoline.

But this issue goes beyond money, said a governor’s spokesman.

“The governor is committed to ethanol and is committed to the good it does our rural communities,” said spokesman Aaron Sanderford.

“It is impossible to ask folks to use ethanol  unless you lead by example. And state government has been leading by example for more than a quarter of a century,” Sanderford said.

Ethanol production is a growing business in Nebraska. By the end of the year, Nebraska will have 12 plants producing just more than 650 million gallons of ethanol, said Todd Sneller, administrator of the Nebraska Ethanol Board.

Currently, about 250 million bushels of Nebraska corn is used by the ethanol industry, he said.

That pricey ethanol blend trend apparently has changed at pumps in the eastern part of the state.

And by last week, a number of Lincoln stations had switched their pricing, so E10 blend was a dime a gallon less than regular.

On at least one corner, competing stations had opposite pricing schemes: one with E10 a dime higher, the other a dime lower.

“It is crazy,” Sneller said.

There’s no explanation why neighboring stations would have opposite pricing strategies.

In fact, it’s difficult to determine how E10 is priced.

The general surge in E10 pricing above regular unleaded at the pump this spring was tied, at least psychologically, to a high demand for ethanol, he said.

Demand increased when  several northeast states substituted ethanol for  MTBE — a product that caused groundwater pollution — as a “clean air” octane booster.

The spot market, where about 5 percent to 15 percent of ethanol is sold for quick delivery, reflected that demand when it rose to its highest price ever, above $4 a gallon and, in one case, to $5.09, Sneller said.

The highest spot market price in Nebraska was $3.81 a gallon, he said.

However, many oil companies and petroleum product marketers  bought most of the ethanol they used this summer by contract, six months or a year ago, at a fairly low price — often under $2 a gallon.

In general, E10 pricing is based on marketing and pricing and profit strategies, Sneller said.

So E10 pricing doesn’t always correspond to the cost of purchasing the pure ethanol itself plus the federal tax break.

E10 has a 5.1 cent a gallon federal tax break; E85 enjoys a 43 cent break, usually taken at the wholesale level.

In fact, the recent dime spread between  E10 and unleaded — either way —  doesn’t reflect the actual difference in price, Sneller said.

In some states, E10 is marketed and priced as a midlevel blend and always sold at a higher price than regular no matter the cost, said Tim Keigher with the Nebraska Petroleum Marketers.

Iowa marketers have chosen to price the blend at less than unleaded gasoline “to get people to buy it,”  said Dawn Carlson, president of the Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores of Iowa.

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.

Understanding ethanol

E10 — A blend of 10 percent ethanol and 90 percent gasoline, often marketed as unleaded plus, super unleaded or regular with ethanol. It is the mid-level octane option between unleaded and premium gas. 

E85 — A blend of 85 percent ethanol to 15 percent gasoline  that can be used in some newer vehicles. It generally reduces fuel efficiency by 8 percent to 20 percent, but with some new cars there is no difference.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
ET wrote on August 7, 2006 2:17 am:
" How nice, price gouging even for ethanol. Greediness knows no bounds. "

What ?? wrote on August 7, 2006 5:43 am:
" Why doesn`t this suprise me ?? The state can afford to pay $3.79 per gal.and refuses to "use anything less" , I can`t believe how much money this state "WASTES" ! Take the Lincoln Regional Center they will only staff 3 staff on a ward that requires 4 staff but then manditory a staff and pay over time when centeral staffing could have added one more staff. So now there paying for 2 staff in maditoring one when all they needed to do was plan ahead and staff the normal amount. Some thing has to be done ASAP with the wasteful state spending !! "

Jeremy wrote on August 7, 2006 7:51 am:
" What percentage of each gallon is made up of state taxes, and just goes right back to the state? I'm willing to support spending extra on ethanol if it supports Nebraska over foreign oil interests. "

ron wrote on August 7, 2006 8:40 am:
" This state wastes more money than a kid with a hole in his pocket!! Seems to me the state is seeing how fast they can spend all that extra money so they can raise our taxes again. Lets not forget all the other wasteful things like the Dept. of Roads 2 man stop sign holding at construction sites or 3 guys washing reflectors on the interstate from inside a moving pickup. (1 to drive - 1 in the middle to wait his turn and one to hang out the door with a scrub brush ) "

Jimmy wrote on August 7, 2006 9:07 am:
" Ethanol is silly. Nebraskans think it is the greatest thing ever. It could help, but not the way we are doing it now (just corn.) We'll figure it out in a few years how silly this is. And I love that it costs more than regular gas at the pump! "

Dee wrote on August 7, 2006 9:36 am:
" What justifies State government taking on a single product to support, regardless of the cost? Are State workers required to eat only beef on business trips? Are all State supplies, furniture, services, consultations, etc. required to be purchased only from Nebraska businesses? And Ethanol gets tax breaks , so there's a another "support" we're all paying for. Everyone who reads this ought to call, e-mail, or write the Governor today and tell him we're not going to stand for this nonsense. We all want to support the farmers and rural communities, but not at this expense. "

Hey what wrote on August 7, 2006 10:16 am:
" Actually they're only paying $3.17 a gallon (the price they locked in the last time they bought in bulk). If you notice, that's not much less than what you and I are paying right now (and watch out...with this Alaska pipeline business you can bet the oil companies are going to use that excuse to raise the price at the pump to $3.50/gal). "

Ly wrote on August 7, 2006 11:35 am:
" Just last week on the news they said these flex cars are not as "flex" as their chalked up to be. Only in Nebraska does the govt. pay the highest price for anything and everything, then expect the citizens smile and pay the double state tax and out of control property taxes. What do they care, as long as they are getting their big pay and autos and gas. My car gets better milage on regular gas than 10% ethenol, so when I'm already struggling to live with the highest taxes in the country, why would I spend more on ethenol. This state should be renamed THE WASTE AND GREED STATE instead of the Cornhusker state. Don't think Hagel has anything to howl about until he helps clean up and do something for his own state. "

Corporate Profits wrote on August 7, 2006 11:54 am:
" Why are we subsidizing these large corporations profits. These companies enjoy tax breaks from the government plus reduction in fuel taxes to motorists and then price the product as high as the market will bear. Maybe it is time to eliminate the tax subsidies and let ethanol compete on its own. "

mike wrote on August 7, 2006 12:38 pm:
" wish i could use other people's money to buy my gas. "

gw wrote on August 7, 2006 12:55 pm:
" I am offended that this article portrays state employees as wasteful. The governor's staff sent out a memo about using the least expensive fuel, even if that meant purchasing E10 over E85. Most state employees work extra hard to assure that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely, I am really offended by the comments of what?? who says the state can afford to pay $3.79 and refused to use anything less. Don't lump all state employees together, especially when it comes to staffing. Most state employees have had to absorb additional work when people retire and the governor doesn't allow for hiring new employees and have to get by doing the work of two or three employees and get no additional pay or benefits for it. "

ron wrote on August 7, 2006 9:27 pm:
" gw..most of the work that I have seen done by state employees can be done by just 1 person because the other 2 are watching the one that is working. So why pay all 3? "