Now
Overcast
61°
High
65°
Low
46°

Don Walton: Nebraska Democrats moving up

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Monday, Aug 07, 2006 - 12:12:58 am CDT

Working their way back. Nebraska Democrats have been at it since a disastrous 2002 election when they were buried by record margins in Senate and gubernatorial races.

Road kill.

In 2004, they made great strides in terms of organization, fund-raising and candidate recruitment, but had no breakthrough victories to show for it.

But Democrats approach the 2006 general election in a strong position to help Ben Nelson defend his Senate seat.  And they’re fielding competitive candidates in the gubernatorial scrap and in at least two House contests.

Although they enter all those struggles — with the exception of the Senate race — as decided underdogs, their congressional nominees  conceivably could catch a ride on the national wave of voter unhappiness with President Bush and the Republican Congress demonstrated in recent polls.

If the ripples splash this far.

In Nebraska, Democrats continue to fall dangerously behind Republicans in voter registration numbers, but their party is growing stronger.

It’s still up against Hertz, but it’s no longer the storefront on the corner.

Here’s some evidence of progress compiled by State Chairman Steve Achelpohl in his newest state party report:

 The party’s budget has tripled since 2002.

 The party held 68 county conventions this year compared to 30 in 2002.  

 The party’s e-mail list has grown from 4,000 in 2004 to more than 20,000 now.

 The party has identified more than 3,000 new volunteers.

The Democratic National Committee no longer considers Nebraska just “a place to fund-raise and recruit volunteers, but not invest in,” Achelpohl states.

Now, the national party funds a communications director, a campaign and field director and two field organizers for the state party in Nebraska.

“And, in an historic first, the Nebraska Democratic Party has been running positive (TV) ads throughout the summer highlighting Nelson’s accomplishments,” the report states.

Those ads have been funded by money from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Nebraska Democrats are still walking uphill in Nebraska.  But they appear headed in the right direction.

Finishing up

 Reaction last week to Chuck Hagel’s views on the Middle East, beginning with his July 28 speech to the Brookings Institution and including his Senate speech calling for an immediate cease fire in Lebanon: 2,921 positive e-mails, phone calls and faxes; 507 negative responses; as compiled by his staff.

 Neither Hagel nor Nelson has yet committed his vote to confirm John Bolton as UN ambassador.

 Both voted for Senate cloture last week on that shotgun-marriage  bill combining a higher minimum wage with sharp reductions in the estate tax and targeted tax cuts.  Both said they would have voted for the bill if it had survived. 

 Progress: Sales of minivans, pickup trucks and SUVs fell 30 percent in July from a year ago.  Last month, passenger cars represented 48 percent of the U.S. market compared with 39 percent a year ago.

 Jim Esch, the Democratic congressional nominee in Omaha’s 2nd District, says his refusal to accept PAC or special interest funding has evolved into a dominant theme of his campaign.

 Jeff Fortenberry will host a renewable energy conference at UNL on Thursday, turning the spotlight on ethanol, biodiesel, biomass and wind energy.

 While the Republican leadership in Washington says “we should stay the course (and) complete the mission” in Iraq, Maxine Moul says, an inspector general’s report detailing failure to complete, or even begin, vital infrastructure projects indicates the Bush administration plans to “cut and run” on its health care and power plant promises.

n First Senate debate on Friday in Lincoln.  Nelson and Pete Ricketts go toe to toe before the Nebraska Broadcasters Association.  Live NET television and radio coverage begins at noon.

 Tom Friedman, speaking to Tim Russert on Meet the Press after returning from the Middle East: “The sort of dark nature of the Cheneys and the Bushes and the Rices, this, this sort of relentless pessimism about the world, this exporting of fear, not hope, has really left people feeling that the idea of America has been stolen from them.”

 OK, two Oklahoma football players have paid the price for breaking an NCAA rule.  Now, how about the Sooner businessman-booster who handed out the money? OU ought to sue that guy for damages inflicted on the program just to make a point, whether it could win in court or not.

 Is the Congress really going to try to finance a revolution in Cuba?

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or dwalton@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Proud NE Democrat wrote on August 7, 2006 2:16 am:
" If you're interested in reading the Nebraska Democratic Party's entire report, it's available at www.nebraskademocrats.org. "

No Special Interest $$ wrote on August 7, 2006 2:28 am:
" It is great to see a candidate, besides Tom Osborne, not take any special interest dollars and give a voice back to the people of Nebraska. Great stand Jim Esch. "

Democratic Stronghold wrote on August 7, 2006 7:06 am:
" Maxine Moul, Jim Esch, Scott Kleeb, and David Hahn are eager to WORK to restore "Nebraska-The Good Life". We can do better than 48th in economic growth. We can have a peaceful, prosperous nation, with real international allies and respect. We can have great education, and very affordable healthcare for all. We just need smart leadership and a population that expects and demands great government. "

Darren wrote on August 7, 2006 7:24 am:
" If there were more democrats like Ben Nelson I may consider becoming one. He seems to be a genuine person who tries to do what he thinks is right, instead of just worrying about what his party thinks. Whenever I've heard him on the radio or on TV he doesn't bash the President or other Republicans, instead he gives alternative views in a calm, intelligent manner which I appreciate. I'm looking forward to the debates with Rickets to see both views and how they react to each other. "

Timmy wrote on August 7, 2006 7:43 am:
" If the Democratic "ripples" splash all the way to pathologically Republican Nebraska it will be definitive evidence that there has been, verily, a political flood of biblical proportions. The Friedman quote you cite is very apt. Unfortunately, the Democrats have been far too complicit in the death of the idea of America, leaving a public that's finally growing weary of watching the trashing of the ideals it once held most sacred no place to turn for a true alternative vision. Perhaps if the Democrats came clean on wrongly supporting a misguided war instead of trying the Clintonesque tactic of having it both ways, and if they pushed to assure Congress asserted its proper checks on the Executive branch and again asserted itself as the party of the people, it would be such an exciting and refreshing change that the ripples could even splash Nebraska. But, as Nebraska's own Conor Oberst once put it, "Fil mish mish." "

Ed wrote on August 7, 2006 8:11 am:
" I am a lifelong Democrat. I gave money to the Democratic party until 2000 when I saw how it used in a very negative way in advertising. After I saw the ad in the Journal Star over the weekend slamming Pete Ricketts, I am glad that I have not given any money to the Nebraska Democrats in six years. I will continue to vote Democratic and will give money to individual candidates but I will not give any money to any organization that uses it in such a negative manner. And I will continue to vote for Democrats. And I don't care who did it first. Just stop it! "

Cut and Run on Power Plants? wrote on August 7, 2006 8:21 am:
" Didn't Maxine Moul and Ben Nelson do that in the 90s and it cost Nebraskans $145 Million? Flip-flops and environmentally left people cost honest Nebraskans a lot of money. "

Ben wrote on August 7, 2006 10:08 am:
" Lincoln Mayoral candidate Roger Yant also does not take any PAC or special interest money. "

Chuck the Pollster? wrote on August 7, 2006 10:24 am:
" "Reaction last week to Chuck Hagels views on the Middle East, beginning with his July 28 speech to the Brookings Institution and including his Senate speech calling for an immediate cease fire in Lebanon: 2,921 positive e-mails, phone calls and faxes; 507 negative responses; as compiled by his staff." Any idea how many were actually from Nebraska? "

Good for Jim Esch wrote on August 7, 2006 10:37 am:
" I applaud Jim Esch for not taking PAC money, but I think it might be a mistake. Tom Osborne could do it because he didn't need the money; he had enough name recognition. Have you seen the fund-raising totals in the 2nd district? Esch is way behind. Terry has brought in $430,000 from PACs. Esch is up against a stronger incumbant opponent and has chosen to fight with one arm tied behind his back. Couldn't you take PAC money and still vote your concience? If a lobbyist has a problem with the way you vote, then they just won't fund you in the future. Isn't that better than not taking any money at all? Standing on principle is ok, but I think he's not likely to be standing at all when this is over. "

Unhappy republican wrote on August 7, 2006 11:24 am:
" I can't believe Hagel's positive emails number. Positive is the very opposite I'm hearing from people. Everbody I talk too can see how he cowtails to who ever can give him brownie points. And all of this up front speaking out is to, again, cowtail people for the presidency. "

Hint wrote on August 7, 2006 11:57 am:
" Here's a freebe for you democrats. Stop pandering to every anti-conservative, anti-religious, anti-bush, anti-war, anti-taxcut, conspiracy theorist breakfast club out there, and you might get some votes. Ben Nelson is doing well, not because of the Democratic Party, but because conservative Republicans find him to be tollerable and independent for the most part. Stop advocating for abortion at all costs. Don't sell out traditional marriage, and have a little respect for deeply held traditions and values, no matter how silly they seem to the the MTV generation. "

Pah wrote on August 7, 2006 7:14 pm:
" There is no respect amongst thieves. Our so-called allies, cry that we don't tow their line on security matters. In fact, the could not care less about the security of the United States. Their sole aim is to build their economies by getting in bed with enemies of America and Israel. That is what will keep the Democratic party down... this insane desire for respect among theives. Open your eyes dems... you're acting like easy marks, eager to be victims of the Euro-Con men who hold seats of power. "

Mikester wrote on August 7, 2006 8:29 pm:
" As the democratic party moves further and further to the left, it will be sad to watch quality people like Nelson thrown overboard by its own party--just as they are doing to Lieberman right now. "

TH wrote on August 7, 2006 10:23 pm:
" Hint, I have been accuse of being anti-bush, anti-religious,anti-conservitive, anti-war, and anti-taxcuts, but guess what I am not any of those. I am anti-bush policy, I think he is not doing a good job and think that Kerry could of done a better one. I am a methodist but believe religion has no place in school, including prayer. I don't agree with the conservitives, but agree more with moderate dems. I do not believe that bushes tax cuts have help us. I believe the rich, they have helped, and us middle class have not been helped by them. It is so easy to lable someone something when you never hear there side. You can hear me go on democratic rants and other dems go on rants too. But just no it is not because we just hate bush. But because we had legitimant questions and believes that his policies do not help us. I want to ask you did dems say you just disagreed with clinton just because you were anti-clinton. No, we knew you had legitimant concers. We didn't agree with you but we knew you had them. That is why we didn't call you anti-clinton. "

joe vocht wrote on August 7, 2006 10:41 pm:
" So what if the Democratic Party moves to the left? Look what the Republican Party has given us...neocons, religious zealots,a great DIVIDE,and above all...misery for the common working person! The Democratic Party has allways been for the rights of the working class (thats most of us...even you Republican wannabees) Check the History of Labor in the United States...Hint doesn't even realize that the deeply held values he wants upheld were the results of the struggles eminating from the Democratic Left! "

William wrote on August 7, 2006 11:24 pm:
" Don, I look forward to your column each Monday. Today I hope you take my criticism for the respectful critique it is offered as. Today's article is a free ad for the Nebraska Democrats. Futther, to perpetuate the extreme rhetoric of Tom Friedman is something out of a Moveon blog, not something I would expect from you. If yours is more of an opinion or persuasion column, perhaps you would consider making that fact known as a dislaimer on your articles? My understanding is that your responsibility is to report the news - it is not to even the playing field between D's and R's. I can't remember the last time you wrote so glowingly about the Republican Party. Perhaps I am wrong, but it is what I perceive. "