Now
Fair
85°
High
87°
Low
67°

Letters, 7/29: Maestro’s thanks

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 - 12:38:05 am CDT

I feel so grateful to call Lincoln my second home, and I am honored to be starting my ninth season as music director of Lincoln’s Symphony Orchestra. It has long been my dream to perform a free outdoor concert that includes and welcomes all citizens of Lincoln.

The July 4 Uncle Sam Jam, a collaboration of the city, the Jaycees, Broadcast House, Pepsi-Cola and Lincoln’s Symphony Orchestra, was my dream come true. After a beautiful day of games, picnics and family fun in the park, Lincoln’s Symphony Orchestra took the stage and played a patriotic concert, ending with the fireworks show choreographed to the music.

I have traveled the world over, conducting orchestras on the East Coast, Mexico, Russia and Korea, and every time I step off the plane in Lincoln, Nebraska, I feel like the luckiest maestro in the world. Lincoln is full of thoughtful and loving citizens, a closely knit artistic community and generous individuals — as exemplified by the magnanimity of Jim and Rhonda Seacrest, who underwrote the concert at Oak Lake Park.

As many of you already know, LSO has recently changed its name, adding an apostrophe s, to Lincoln’s Symphony Orchestra. Our new name reflects our commitment to community ownership. We want all members of Lincoln to feel a strong connection with LSO, and we want them to feel as comfortable in our concert hall as they were at Oak Lake Park on July 4.

Thank you for the opportunity to be a part of such a magical evening. We hope that it becomes an annual event. The Uncle Sam Jam was a great kickoff to LSO’s 80th season, and I can’t wait to see you all on Sept. 8 for our opening concert in Kimball Hall.

Edward Polochick,

Lincoln’s Symphony Orchestra

Frittered away

Your July 22 editorial refers to wealth “… frittered away by irresponsible heirs …” It is, of course, their wealth to do with as they see fit. Your pejorative reference to heirs sounds like small-minded envy.

Wealth is leaving the state to avoid extreme tax rates including, especially, the 16 percent that state and county officials can confiscate from heirs’ wealth.

Your criticism would be more accurately directed at politicians who fritter away Other People’s Money (our wealth) to fund programs to buy votes. They are the cause of wealth fleeing Nebraska.

To fritter one’s own wealth is freedom. To fritter Other People’s Wealth is loathsome.

Richard L. Christensen, Lincoln

Where does he stand?

Recently I had the pleasure of attending the Fremont Days Parade in Fremont. Undoubtedly one of the most memorable entries in that parade was First District Rep. Jeff Fortenberry’s enormous entourage, which included an all-black drum and dance team.

These youth were incredibly talented, and, to most parade-goers, their marching with Fortenberry probably stood as testament to the congressman’s commitment to diversity and equality. Unfortunately, they would have been mistaken.

Just three days earlier, Fortenberry had voted for amendments intended to weaken the Voting Rights Act of 1965 upon its renewal. By doing so, he turned his back on the centuries-long struggle for civil rights, choosing to stand with his party’s far-right fringe rather than the legacy and sacrifice of leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr.

Fortenberry owes an apology to Nebraska’s entire black community, whose children’s talent he is willing to exploit in a parade but whose rights he is not willing to protect in Congress.

Kyle Michaelis, Lincoln

Hatred and hyperbole

Raleigh J. Peterson (letter, July 19) equates Islamic fascists (who hack off the heads of innocent prisoners) with Bush and the Christian right because he doesn’t think the administration is doing enough to help the poor.

Pathetic. His hatred is exceeded only by his hyperbole. I would quote some facts, but that would only confuse someone whose mind is already made up.

Steve Tonkin, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
c.h. wrote on July 29, 2006 8:15 am:
" I agree with mr. Christensen. When I die, whatever I leave to my heirs belongs to them. I'll be dead. I won't care. What I want to go to charity, will be willed to those charities. If, when my kids are 'frittering away' what will then be THEIR wealth, if you want them to do it here, then give them something fun to fritter it away on. Let them have a cocktail (do people still 'have cocktails'?) on a beach at a state park or two. Let them throw away a couple of hundred bucks in a casino. Stop being the no-fun state if you want revenues to stay here. Nebraska has been trying to legislate morality for a long time. By now they should see that it's just not working out for them! "

Gerard Harbison wrote on July 29, 2006 8:53 am:
" Nice job, Kyle, taking talking points directly from the nebraskademocrats.org web page and getting them published as a 'letter'. Actually, one amendment was to insist on English only ballots. Could someone explain how that impacts Nebraska's black community? "

Mad Democrats wrote on July 29, 2006 9:19 am:
" I'm a minority and Democrats take my vote for granted. Well, wrong folks. You haven't advanced the Civil Rights movement in 45 yrs and I am voting Republican. Thank you Congressman Fortenberry for being a uniter and not a divider. "

CS wrote on July 29, 2006 11:07 am:
" I don't see how voting on an Act that is irrelevent eccept that it gets minority blowhards 5 seconds in the spotlight is doing the Republicans or Democrats any favors. I know I haven't observed any voter testing or income means testing going on-or voting lines for blacks and whites. Its an election year, folks, look how 'busy' our legislators are on 'important' issues. "

Concerned and Offended wrote on July 29, 2006 11:08 am:
" I am offended by today’s “Letter to the Editor.” It is hardly a letter, but rather a contrived rant seeking to objectify a racial group in pursuit of public policy objectives. A group of talented, young people should have the right to demonstrate their support for whichever candidate they choose. Those students chose Congressman Fortenberry as their representative. The author of today’s “letter” claims to be concerned about protecting political expression and freedom, but instead disrespects the political expression of these talented and engaged citizens. Instead of demanding an apology from our Congressman, Kyle should apologize to these students. "

Al Jolson wrote on July 29, 2006 12:16 pm:
" Kyle, I definitely didn't need to hear from somebody with a chip on their shoulder talking about minority voting rights. As a white male, I will be in the minority in the future was will Mr. Fortenberry. Will you be so willing to stand up for my rights when that time comes, Kyle? "

no more fort wrote on July 29, 2006 2:48 pm:
" I'm sure Kyle will be standing up for your rights in the future. Fortenberry only cares about the rights of his rich republican base and not the working people. Fortenberry does not represent the typical Nebraskan. What piece of legislation has he sponsored that benefited Nebraska? He has voted for some, but he has not written the legislation himself. The only bills I could find that he sponsored was tax bills that benefited the super rich and businesses. "

Anthony wrote on July 29, 2006 8:43 pm:
" I believe Congressman Osborne voted as did Congressman Fortenberry. It's interesting that Democrat blog regulars (which Mr. Michaelis is, I just Googled his name) don't accuse Congressman Osborne of exploiting black children. Ah, but this isn't about the rights of blacks...it's about putting Democrats in office. A group of young, talented, exciting, entertaining musicians choose to perform with Congressman Fortenberry's entourage, and the Democrat operatives turn it into a race war. This is yet another indication of the utter lack of respect for minorities demonstrated by many in the Democrat Party. This is bad for the country, and America is SICK of it. I am thankful to the Congressman for extending an open hand to these young people. "

TH wrote on July 29, 2006 10:01 pm:
" Yes, but Osborne is not running for re-election. Osborne is now done with politics since he lost the republican nomination for governor. Fortenberrry is running for re-election. Also Pres. Bush didn't even support those amendments. Those were put up by the extreme right of the republicans in the house and I think it is sad anyone, Fortenberry or Osborne, would vote for them. "

A.S. wrote on July 29, 2006 10:13 pm:
" In response to UNL Professor Harbison's comment in regards to how would Fortenberry's vote of nay on renewing the Civil Rights act of 1965. The proposed amendment to eliminate the requirement of printing out multilingual ballots in communities with large ethnic populations does not affect blacks in Nebraska. It does however affect the spirit of the struggle they went through for equal rights and many died for in the process. It is an insult to the civil rights act. That is why Congressman Fortenberry owes an apology to not only the black community but all ethnic minorities who are citizens of this country. It is a disgrace. Any weakening of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is regressive and step in the wrong direction, no matter how small. I would think a man with your level of education would recognize this. "

Barry wrote on July 30, 2006 2:01 am:
" Kyle Michaelis's propaganda attack on Fortenberry is one befitting the pages of the Democrat blogsites he frequents, not the Lincoln Journal Star. If Michaelis knew anything of the amendments he mentions, he'd know that they, like Mr. Harbison points out, would discontinue the use of multilingual ballots and require that our common language be the one we cast votes in. Is this an insult to the black community? I think not. If Democrats are going to continue playing the race card, they should at least have their facts straight. "

Kyle wrote on July 30, 2006 11:20 am:
" I would like to point out, to Anthony, that Congressman Osborne did not vote with Fortenberry on ANY of these Amendments. Moreover, to Barry, I would like to point out that only one of these Amenmdents involved multilingual ballots. Fortenberry also voted to shorten the VRAs extension from 25 years to 10 and to weaken the Justice Department's enforcement of the Act. It is amazing how these folks will level charges of propaganda while basing their arguments on flat-out lies. I can only hope they're speaking out of ignorance and not with some darker purpose. "

William wrote on July 30, 2006 2:57 pm:
" This Kyle guy is an example of why people are sick of liberals running the Democratic Party - they are destroying both the Party and the harmony of our country. Rather than congratulate Fortenberry for being inclusive and welcoming, he accuses him of exploiting black children. Now, interestingly, a "Kyle" writes that he hopes there's not "some darker purpose". Incredible. No shame. The power seekers running the Dem Party will do ANYTHING to get power...even play the race card. I've noticed no Democrat leaders condemning this obvious ploy. Fortenberry has done a good job, and they're searching frantically for anything to tear him down. How about propsoing some better ideas?! There's a thought. "

Tony wrote on July 30, 2006 3:37 pm:
" According to the House roll call, reauthorization of the 1965 Voting Rights Act passed 390-33 with Congressman Fortenberry voting FOR - not against. I'm suspicious, then, why Mr. Michaelis accuses our elected Congressman of racism and usury so freely. One can argue about this or that amendment, or the intentions of those introducing the amendments, but do not present opinion as fact. If Fortenberry is the racist, child-exploiting monster Michaelis suggests he is, it's difficult to fathom why Fortenberry would vote in favor of the bill! Democrat operative Kyle Michaelis saw debate on the bill as an opportunity to play the race card. What's ironic and telling is that he used teens of color to do so. I'm curious whether these teens have as sinister an opinion of Congressman Fortenberry as does Mr. Michaelis. Judging from their actions, one must conclude not! One may ask why Mr. Michaelis would do such a despicable thing...whether it is truly for the rights of minorities or is it to gain some footing for the Democrat challenger by calumniating Fortenberry's good name. I think most people can figure this out for themselves. "