Now
Fair
55°
High
79°
Low
49°

Letters, 6/12: Test of excitement

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Monday, Jun 12, 2006 - 09:00:33 am CDT

State Fair Racing is on, and they have an amusing radio ad that basically says why go to a boring Shakespeare Festival when you could see an exciting day of racing.

We agree that horse racing is exciting, but so is Shakespeare!  As the local Shakespeare Festival, we offer to put this to the test.

If the State Fair will give us a time and date, we will provide a snippet of Shakespeare exactly the length of one of their races. If the crowd in the clubhouse cheers, we prove our point and the races replace their ad with something more accurate. If they don’t, we’ll slink away and perform “Comedy of Errors” at the Swan Theatre in Wyuka Cemetery without further comment. 

What do you say, State Fair?  “Curse he that first cries ‘hold, enough!’”

Bob Hall, Lincoln

director 

Flatwater Shakespeare Company

Affordable broadband

Recent discussion about broadband Internet access in Nebraska compels me to share what I’ve found.

I suppose the people who are saying that every citizen of Nebraska has high-speed Internet access available are technically correct. Anything can be had — for a price.

I work out of a home office, and on a typical working day will spend six to seven hours out on the road and another two to three hours online submitting reports on the day’s activities and planning the next day. I could cut the time online by at least an hour per day if I had affordable high-speed Internet access available. The key word is affordable. 

As far as DSL goes, Alltel has a DSL transmitter in Seward and another in Milford. The coverage areas do not overlap. By coincidence I live in the country in a mile-wide “dead” zone between the two transmitters. So much for DSL.

High-speed access is also available via satellite. I’ve checked three different sources, including Alltel, Mainstay, and a smaller private source. All charge roughly the same, a setup fee of $400 to $600, plus monthly billings of from $60 to $100 depending on plan, prices that basically are not viable, nor within reason, for the typical user.

I can get more TV channels than I even want to think about via satellite for around $35 per month with a minimal, if any, installation charge. What I don’t understand is, why is there such a difference in pricing between TV satellite service and Internet satellite service?  I’m receptive to a logical explanation.

Gene Gausman, Milford

We need courage

With the contentious illegal immigration issue looming in America, Nebraska has an excellent opportunity to show leadership in combating this epidemic. We need only to look in the cities and towns with meat processing plants. Lexington is a very good example. Why did we let this happen?

We often hear about Republicans catering to big business. There is enough corruption to go around here within both parties. The meatpacking industry is big business, but no one in Congress, or the House of Representatives, has the courage to take them on.

Here is a solution: pressure the Department of Homeland Security to sponsor investigations, including “roundups,” at these processing plants in these cities and towns.

Arrest not only the illegal immigrants, but the CEOs, CIOs, COOs and human resource managers and charge them with conspiracy, aiding and abetting and collusion. The white-collar criminals go to court and the illegal immigrants go home.

Nebraska would be known for what would be called a “New Trail of Tears” that begins in central Nebraska and extends through Kansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. I am sure they took the shortest route in, so they can take the shortest route out. The cost would be minimal compared with the tax dollars required to harbor them here.

The most loved man in America is Arizona’s Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. He has the courage to do something. Do we?

Loren Zimmerman, Chadron

We need Nelson

Eric Friesen (letter, June 1) is attempting to make a flawed analogy to support Wall Street Pete.

Sen. Ben Nelson has raised money from thousands of individual Nebraskans over the course of his long career representing our state. Unlike our Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, Nelson has not had to return funds from unethical and possibly illegal Republican fundraising schemes.

If Pete Ricketts has to spend more than $10 million to play catch-up with Ben Nelson’s outstanding record of concern for and action on behalf of Nebraskans, that just shows that he has nothing else to stand on.

We should be thankful for the influence Nelson has built in Washington and his efforts to use that influence on behalf of our great state. Now, when we need someone to look out for our interests more than ever, we need Nelson, not Ricketts’ millions.

Doris Hoopes, Lincoln

Marsh had trees

I am replying to the column in the Local View section by Lisa Tompkin dated April 1 and entitled “Shoemaker Marsh’s serenity is no more” and the rebuttal response in the letters to the editor section dated April 12 by Terry Genrich entitled “Marsh restoration.”

My name is Dr. Charles F. Craft, and I am the son of Fred Craft, one of the original members of the Little Salt Duck Club on North 27th now named Shoemaker’s Marsh. I’d like to reply to Genrich (Natural Resources Manager, Lincoln Parks and Recreation Department), who commented on the recent tree removal there by stating “historical aerial photographs show that at one time, there were very few trees on Shoemaker Marsh, and the trees that were removed did not exist until after 1970.”

My father hunted and managed Little Salt since the 1940s, and I joined him starting in the early 1960s. We hunted for several decades out of the blind that was recently removed by the state. And for years we walked among the trees that are now missing on the hillside that was right behind the blind.

I can assure you that many large trees did indeed exist here long before 1970 and had always been a part of the natural wetlands that are found there along the marsh for as long as we can remember.

Unfortunately, the entire hillside is now bare except for the remaining stumps of the older and larger trees that were cut down. Because only this one hill has been cleared out of the entire three-lake marsh, it appears that the real reason to make this space was not to protect the environment but rather to create room for some sort of future building for the public.

I hope my observation is not true as it is always a shame when people end up damaging nature while having the best intentions of trying to save it!

Charles F. Craft, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Helmets are a good idea

On May 15, Bob and Ann Brown wrote a letter praising this newspaper for an article on bike commuting that appeared shortly before, but chiding the paper for using a photograph of a cyclist without a helmet. They did not name or chide the cyclist.

However, the cyclist responded in a letter published on May 27, saying that no one was going to tell him to wear a helmet (the Browns did not do that).

The cyclist then said that the Browns should be promoting safe cycling — showing how little he knows of the Browns, who for years have been doing just that. They have not argued for a mandatory helmet law but have simply and convincingly shown that wearing a helmet is a good idea.

With Trail Trek on the horizon, and good weather bringing out cyclists of all ages in vast numbers, all cyclists need to remember that following the rules of the road, just like motorists, is the best way to avoid collisions. Helmets don’t help avoid collisions — safe cycling does!

(But wear a helmet just in case that’s not enough.)

Bob Boyce, Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Phil wrote on June 12, 2006 10:08 am:
" Gene... there is a solution. Allow public power utilities to implement broadband service over the power grid. They cannot do so now, because of regulations and resistance by the communications companies. In my opinion, the communications companies have been raping the consumer, just because they can. There is really no justification for the prices they charge for broadband service. That is what you get when you have a franchise monopoly, justified to a degree because of the capital expense involved; however, the Internet is an add on to that existing infrastructure. Gouging at the gas pump pales in comparison! "

L.O.D. wrote on June 12, 2006 10:32 am:
" Broadband access is yet another reason why young people are leaving rural areas. Commerce, entertainment, education, communication. All things that the sheer beauty of the wide open Sandhills cannot provide. Broadband providers will always be playing catch up in rural areas, even when high-throughput wireless technology comes online. Ever tried to use a cell phone more than 15 miles from I-80? Imagine maintaining a connection for streaming video over such a poor connection. DSL, while not a bad option, is usually A LOT slower than cable. I know very few people under the age of 35 with hardline phones to begin with, so there are additional fees that most people would not put up with. Finally, what do you think is the #1 criteria for most business travelers in selecting a hotel? Yep, wired in-room internet connection. Bad news for towns not on major transportation and communications corridors. "

Bert wrote on June 12, 2006 1:23 pm:
" Loren, you have the right ideas over the immigration issue. If our courts would follow through and in force the laws that are on the books. I would say that putting these white collars, starting at the top, in jail, would soon solve the problem. They are no better then the low life smugglers. "

Gary wrote on June 12, 2006 4:02 pm:
" I completely agree with Doris. I'm sick of Ricketts whining that he can't compete without spending all of daddy's money. Maybe if he had a record on anything (not just politics either - but doing something for his community), he wouldn't have to spend so much. "

Jenn wrote on June 12, 2006 5:07 pm:
" While I applaud Loren Zimmerman on taking a bold stance on this issue and go after the businesses who hire these workers, I also think we must think what the consequences of this action would be be. With these people in jail, who will run these busninesses? Will these businesses continue to be ran, or will they close down as a result. Will towns see its plant be closed? While the illegal immigrants are costing us a great deal of money, they are still a necessary part of our American fabric on the federal, state, and local levels. "

Anne wrote on June 12, 2006 5:33 pm:
" Frankly, it's a joke for the Republican party of DeLay and Abramoff to criticize anyone about their fundraising. Ben Nelson gets a lot of support because he's been around for a long time. Unlike golf, Ricketts shouldn't get a handicap because he doesn't know anything. Lack of experience isn't a virtue! "

Lee wrote on June 12, 2006 5:36 pm:
" I now live in a town of about 50 is North Central Kansas, I have broadband internet. It cost me nothing to have it installed, & only $32.00 before taxes to have. Previously I lived in SE Nebr in a town of 250. When I moved 3 yrs ago, it was still dial up. I believe it now has broadband, but is expensive to have it hooked up & too have. Down here in kansas, the backwards state some call it, I guess we are way ahead of our times. So glad I am here now, not up there in the advanced state of Nebraska! "

Dan wrote on June 12, 2006 5:42 pm:
" Phil argues that allowing broadband over power lines is a solution to low-cost broadband in rural areas. Phil, are you aware of how many private power companies are doing this right now in the U.S. or elsewhere in the world? None. I'm serious. Not one. You can easily verify this. Why? BPL just isn't working the way advocates have hoped. It may yet work in the future when problems are worked out. Before someone writes and argues that European power companies are providing broadband--check carefully. They are not providing BPL. A few are reselling from telecoms but no power company in the world delivers broadband over power lines. That's because BPL just isn't working. The Manassas, VA project has yet to become functional. And it has only been able to make the technology work to deliver a small amount of data(not enough to be broadband) over a short distance (100 meters or so) on power lines. The saving grace just isn't here. Its been six years since broadband took off in the U.S. Stop arguing government is needed to take it further. Government is the problem for a host of reasons that would take pages to explain. I do agree with L.O.D. that rural areas lag, although that might qualify as a "duh" factor. Rural areas got electricity last, television last, radio last, highways last (oh, wait, still waiting on that one), etc. L.O.D. argues DSL is slower than cable. Cable operates on a node in a neighborhood. If no one else is logged on, you get the full node and thus can usually get a faster speed that most DSL's. But every person who logs on slows down the data delivery. DSL is dedicated to the end-user. I've used both extensively. I'd argue DSL is the best hope right now for rural customers since its rare for cable companies to operate outside city limits and the telco's are used to being in rural areas and want badly to preserve their business. Let DSL providers know you want broadband. I've been pleased with the build-out the last few years. Most Neb. phone companies are well past 80 percent of their addressable lines and shooting for 100 percent since that's where the future lies. I approached my little telco and some months later, they built out to me. "

jana wrote on June 12, 2006 10:51 pm:
" Sadly, most people wouldn't GET Shakespeare, so they'd comb their mullets all fancy-like and head on down to the races instead...which is a shame, because Shakespeare in the park is a beautiful thing. "

Phil wrote on June 12, 2006 11:23 pm:
" You are correct, that BPL is not yet going gang-busters. However, the CVEC system (Central Virginia Electric Cooperative) has been running a pilot program, and is very near open enrollment, providing rural Virginians with broadband service. Most of the problems associated with BPL have to do with fears of Amateur Radio enthusiasts about interference issues. CVEC has dealt with these issues and claims to have no such problems. Cable systems took many many years to implement broadband across their systems as well. "

Bluegill wrote on June 13, 2006 7:11 am:
" Mr. Gausman asks for an explanation why TV service is cheaper than, and more accessible, than broadband. Simple answer: supply and demand. Mr. Gausman has made a market decision: live in an area where broadband service is not readily available. In our free eneterprise society, he could have chosen to live in a different area, and have better access to broadband service. Surely, he doesn't believe that we taxpayers should subsidize his desires, after he exercised his freedom of choice! "

Molly wrote on June 13, 2006 10:52 am:
" Hi Jana, I like going to the horse races and last time I checked...I didn't have a mullet. Weird! I knew I shouldn't have went to that new hairstylist. I noticed my neck is no longer red either....crazy! "

Ken wrote on June 14, 2006 7:20 pm:
" BPL is a joke! I can't believe people are still holding out for this crap. The same limitations that face DSL face BPL. Its called physics. The fact that they're sending signals along an unshielded cable make it less likely (not more likely) to work. While it has been tested in a few small communities, with limited success, not a single BPL system has really been tested in a rural setting. They used the notion of BPL being able to solve the issue of rural broadband as a sales pitch for relaxed regulation and pubic assitance - but they still haven't delivered. Such corporate welfare would be better spent toward wireless and/or laying more fiber-optic. "