Now
Partly Cloudy
56°
High
63°
Low
42°

Every Nebraskan can get broadband service

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NANCY HICKS / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, May 25, 2006 - 12:10:55 am CDT

Every Nebraskan has access to some kind of broadband Internet service, a representative of the state’s telephone industry told a legislative task force Wednesday.

A recent report to the task force from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law “vastly underrepresented the amount of competitive broadband available in Nebraska,” said Eric Carstenson, representing the Nebraska Telecommunications Association.

The Brennan Center report indicated that many rural Nebraskans have limited broadband options and some can get only the much slower dial-up service.

Story Photo
(Photos.com)

For those Nebraskans who can’t get broadband through cable or telephone wires, there is WildBlue satellite service, Carstenson said.

And local telephone companies are quickly moving to provide the faster broadband service to more customers, he said.

The broadband task force, created by the Legislature, is studying whether public utilities should be allowed to compete with telephone companies, cable companies and other private broadband providers in the state. 

The Brennan Center report recommended that public power companies and local governments should be able to provide broadband service in order to give all Nebraskans low-cost options. 

Telephone and cable companies have opposed allowing publicly owned utilities and cities to get into the business.

Carstenson said his report, based on newer data and more companies, shows every Nebraskan has at least one broadband option and very few Nebraskans have limited broadband options.  

Task force members agreed Wednesday that they should look at the issue of broadband availability.

But they were divided over whether the cost to the consumer should also be a factor in their recommendations to the Legislature, due in December.

“Cost is not an issue,” said state Sen. Mick Mines of Blair, a member of the task force.

“We as a task force are charged with the availability of broadband service in Nebraska,” he said.

But the Brennan Center report said that cost to the consumer should be an issue  because low-income and rural Nebraskans need  good Internet access to operate in a modern world.   

Allowing public power companies and local government to get into the business would provide more competition and lower the cost to consumers, the report said.

The Brennan study said Nebraskans are paying between $20 to $100 a month for broadband service.

If people in one community have only one option, at a cost of $50, doesn’t there need to be competition with a lower price, asked Linda Aerni of Columbus, a task force member who owns a private Internet service provider company  and who would like to partner with public power companies.

She also pointed out that telephone companies receive a government subsidy through the universal service fund created with payments made by telephone customers. Nebraska telephone companies received almost $104 million through the federal and state funds in 2003, she noted. 

Reach Nancy Hicks at 473-7250 or nhicks@journalstar.com.

Broadband everywhere

Lincoln has 11 broadband Internet options, Waverly has eight, Hickman has six and Crete has seven, according to a report to a legislative task force from Eric Carstenson, representing the Nebraska Telecommunications Association.

Only 40 communities have just one option. That includes 18 unincorporated communities and 14 with populations of less than 100, the report said.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Kyle Michaelis wrote on May 25, 2006 12:43 am:
" "Cost is not an issue"? Who does Sen. Mines think he's kidding (except, perhaps, himself)? Availability can not be divorced from cost, particularly with the sad economic conditions faced by many rural Nebraska counties. The state has an interest in removing the digital divide - not just between rural and urban but also between RICH and POOR. If Mines can not appreciate that, what is he doing serving on this taskforce? "

Rural Resident wrote on May 25, 2006 5:48 am:
" Mr. Eric Arstenson of the Nebraska Telecommunications Association obviously does not live in rural Nebraska. He comments show the huge disconnect this organization has with rural Nebraska realities. Our "local" phone companies (e.g., Alltel) have stonewalled efforts to provide broadband service to rural residents. Rural residents live in a telecommunications third world country! "

Lynda wrote on May 25, 2006 6:43 am:
" I would sure like Mr Carstenson tell me what's available to me because I've tried every service I know of and I can't get it. That includes satelite!! "

Hjalmer wrote on May 25, 2006 6:46 am:
" I live 20 miles from Lincoln and Alltel has no plans to provide service so our only option is to spend $400 to buy satelite equpiment then spend $57.90 per month to get broadband service. Given the fact that broadband service in most of the world costs about $22 per month, it's clear some competition is necessary. Access to the internet should be a public utility just like seware and water service. Let the power companies provide the service. "

Gerard Harbison wrote on May 25, 2006 7:50 am:
" It's distressing to see lies and half truth like those from the Nebraska Telecommunications Association go unchallenged. A mere 20 miles from Lincoln, we don't have access to DSL or cable. Satellite modems have a huge initial investment, and a high monhtly fee. EVDO runs basically at 56 K dialup rates out here. But in order to avoid a little competition, they will deny rural residents access to broadband internet. "

Satellite? wrote on May 25, 2006 8:53 am:
" Has anyone in these talks realized that you can receive high speed internet connectivity through satellite regardless of where you live in the United States? Don't give me some sob story either about it costing too much because if you’re going to life in the middle of nowhere then you have to suffer the consequences of that region not being economically developed. "

Bob wrote on May 25, 2006 8:57 am:
" Sure, Nebraskans may have access to broadband - but at what price? The telephone industry is running scared that if public power and municipalities offer broadband it will be at a lower price and force them to lower theirs. And, "Only 40 communities have just one option...?" Apparently they're considered second class citizens and don't deserve any better. The telephone industry has done a poor job of deploying affordable broadband in Nebraska. Public power and municipalities are capable of doing that - and helping Nebraskans. Telephone executives/owners/shareholders are only interested in lining their pockets with hard earned Nebraska dollars. "

John T wrote on May 25, 2006 11:40 am:
" Has anyone on this task force even looked at the availability of broadband in the rural areas? With the growing number of people building homes in smaller out-lying areas and housing communities and just the average rural residents we would like a couple more options for broadband than just the one or two (if your lucky) satelite or wireless providers to bring the price down a bit to a more reasonable level. How else are the smaller communities and more sparcely populated areas supposed to grow or attract growth if they have to pay outrageous prices to be connected to the outside world, especially with the content of the web/media/telecommunications world becoming ever more bandwidth intensive. Just some food for though from a farmer (and by the way food doesn't as some may believe come from the grocery store it comes from a farmer, which is a dieing profession these days) "

J. Scott Stewart wrote on May 25, 2006 12:02 pm:
" The telephone and cable monopolies have operated for decades without competition. It's time to say "enough" to high costs and poor (even non-existant) customer service. Competiton will bring lower prices and better service response. "

jill wrote on May 25, 2006 12:44 pm:
" I live 5 miles from lincoln city limits and I can't get DSL or broadband. I should have those options when I live so close. There are housing areas going up around me and still only dial up. I could understand if I lived 50 miles from a city but they should give several options that is reasonable price. "

Dan wrote on May 25, 2006 12:47 pm:
" Let’s think for a minute. Get a telephone package like MCI Neighborhood, Qwest, Charter Digital Telephone, and even Alltel has a package for around $50 you have unlimited long distance access. Get a modem about $30.00 sign up for a DSL package with anybody in the USA and you have broadband service. Before I moved to Lincoln and before we had cable service, that’s how I received it and it work great. Now if you are 15 miles for your telephone exchange you might have some copper loss to the point DSL might not work. Be sure to check with the telephone company before doing it though. I had great service with Qwest. Or we can set back and wait for the power company to provide it legally and then wait for them to get the money and man power to provide it, then wait for them to build a system (wires are different) and in 20 years you might get it. There is no magic wand for $20 a month service. No matter where you live there are advantages and disadvantages. You have to weight them out and decide what is important to you. The Constitution says “Pursuit of Happiness” not guaranteed happiness. "

Political Activist wrote on May 25, 2006 5:05 pm:
" If you live in an area that lacks affordable broadband, you should write to the Lt. Governor. He is running the LB 645 Task Force and all they are hearing is that there is service "everywhere." His email is ricksheehy@notes.state.ne.us "

Rod wrote on May 25, 2006 6:44 pm:
" What a load of crap. Broadband is NOT available everywhere. My kids live 7 miles in the country which makes DSL not feasable, cable non existent, satellite prohibitively expensive if anyone even offers it and wireless a joke. Sounds like a case of the phone and cable companies trying to protect their monopoly. "

Judy Cantrell wrote on May 25, 2006 6:52 pm:
" Kyle Michaelis is correct. "

farm wife wrote on May 25, 2006 9:44 pm:
" yes we in rural areas have options, but they are few and they are expensive. we put up with dial up for years through our local telephone company, we endured slow connections, rude and incompetent service, and our phone line constantly tied up, finally we got fed up, spent several hundred dollars purchasing satellite equipment from direcway and we pay a monthly connection fee, it's user friendly, i've never been down in three years, and its fast. however its a big expense and i'm sure not one every family can afford. it is time to end the monoply that the phone companies have in the small rural areas. "

Understandable wrote on May 25, 2006 10:59 pm:
" Dependant on where you are in the country there is the possibility of receiving wireless broadband. Unfortunately you have to be in line-of-sight of the tower. But, I will definitely awknowledge some very large holes in high-speed internet. Just trying offer an idea since I am a city dweller can't complain at all. "