Now
Fair
12°
High
32°
Low
24°

Broadband roadblock bad for Nebraska

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Wednesday, May 24, 2006 - 12:11:06 am CDT

Nebraska needs fast broadband Internet service to prosper in the 21st century. The quickest way to make that vital service available to businesses and consumers in rural areas of the state is to allow publicly owned utilities and locally owned governments to provide it.

But the Legislature threw a roadblock in the path of progress last year when it passed a two-year moratorium on that sort of thing.

A task force was supposed to begin studying the issue. But it has begun to meet only recently.

Meanwhile, access to high-speed broadband continues to spread across the United States, dividing the country into the haves and the have-nots. Thanks to the moratorium, much of Nebraska languishes in the have-not category.

Nebraska’s privately owned phone companies pushed for the prohibition. Their opposition has not abated. That’s perhaps understandable, since phone service is now offered over the Internet. They don’t want competition. And the phone company’s main argument — that government should not compete with the private sector — has undeniable appeal.

The trouble with their argument is that strict reliance on the private sector means Nebraska businesses and consumers are on the outside looking in, condemned to slow, dial-up Internet access.

The private sector is not providing broadband. Because government and publicly owned utilities have been blocked by legislation, that means that that no one is providing the service.

Early in the 20th century, Nebraska found itself in a similar situation when the private sector failed to provide electricity to vast swaths of the state. That’s when hardy, self-reliant Nebraskans banded together in the public sector to furnish their own electricity. The legacy lives on today; Nebraska is the only state in the nation where all electricity is publicly owned.

Today, Nebraska’s leaders should follow the sensible example set by their predecessors.

A “white paper” arguing strongly that Nebraska should permit public entities in the state to provide broadband access was released Monday by a coalition of Nebraska organizations.

Prepared by the Brennan Center for Justice based in New York, the paper suggests: “In a worst-case scenario, Nebraska towns may lose businesses that need high-speed Internet access to larger towns or other states or countries. … Nebraska companies large and small depend on timely data. Communities with affordable broadband will have a competitive advantage.”

The city of Lincoln may have a way around the current moratorium by creating an arrangement in which a private company would get a franchise to provide a high-speed wireless network.

But that arrangement may not be best for other communities in the state. The Brennan Center suggests legislators step aside and let local communities decide for themselves whether they need the public sector to provide one of the 21st centuries necessities. The task force and state senators should pay heed.

 


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Editorial Main > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Mike wrote on May 24, 2006 8:57 am:
" More government is never the answer. Who's to say the government can roll-out broadband quickly and efficiently to underserved markets? I have much more faith in the private companies who have invested in the technology and infrastructure verses a burdensome and blundering government that stuggles to get pot holes patched up. How about incentives for private business? "

Dan wrote on May 24, 2006 12:44 pm:
" Let’s see sense the government stated regulating my cable TV the price has tripled and it was promised to lower my bill. When ever the government gets involved it cost more money. I deal with rural Nebraska constantly and I can’t find a place that doesn’t have broadband access. Some only have one provider but all that I can find has DSL available for businesses. T1 connections are available to all locations. My mother lives in a town of 500 in western Nebraska, and when I last checked the connection speed it just about matched my roadrunner here in Lincoln. There may be some towns in the Sandhills that have a slower connection but the local power company won’t throw up 9 miles of cable to supply one house for $20 a month, if mandated someone will have to pay for it. They don’t have cable TV out there; they do have phone and the length of telephone wire determines the speed of data transfer. Brennan Center for Justice based in NEW YORK knows what life in the Sandhills is like? That’s like asking someone in Florida what life is like in Northern Alaska and then make recommendations. Unless they have been there and lived it all they can tell you about it is what the can read. The government needs to stay out of our lives more and let us take care of ourselves, without mandating how we are to live or what we consume. "

Brett Otte wrote on May 24, 2006 1:22 pm:
" Cities would have an UNFAIR ADVANTAGE. That is NOT competition. What if they just charged a flat $25/mo? NOBODY would use Time Warner, DSL, etc anymore! All those Time Warner techs would be out of a job & hopefully get jobs with the city. Yeah, I'm sure they'd be happy about that. Who do I complain to when my internet drops? The city? Yeah, that sounds great! Their bureaucracy would patch it up the same day I'm sure. With the NSA collecting phone call data...what would the CITY do with our surfing habits? What kind of privacy policy would they have? What would happen when they're SUED by the RIAA and movie companies for ppl illegally downloading content? Would they tell 'em who you are and what you download? The city should be there to fill the void for things that businesses obviously can't make money on or just flat-out SHOULDN'T make money on such as NECESSITIES to live a modern lifestyle. I love that we have publicly owned power and the argument for this wireless broadband seems to parallel that whole situation. THESE ARE NOT THE SAME THING! Power is just flat-out required for 99%+ to live a modern lifestyle. It is a necessity. I would like it if Nebraska was in the natural gas market as well! High-speed internet is a luxury. Plain and simple. Same goes for phone service, cell phone service, TV (cable, satellite, etc). None of this is a necessity. Ppl today have these things confused. The city should provide a governing body, emergency services, police, fire/rescue, road construction/repair, electricity, natural gas (in my opinion), and that's about it. See how the LJS's study they printed yesterday put a nice spin on this stating 30%+ of NE TOWNS don't have access to high-speed internet? They didn't state what PERCENTAGE of ppl don't have access. Lord knows all of Lincoln & Omaha-metro are covered along with the top 10 cities: Linc/Omaha, Bellevue, Grand Island, Kearney, Fremont, Norfolk, N. Platte, Hastings, & Columbus which is 68% of our 1.75 million population. I'm not saying the the rest don't deserve high-speed, but they said 30+% of the TOWNS don't have access, not 30+% of the people. If you're gonna do something about this change the rules on 'em like we did with the phone companies to complete the "last mile". Force 'em to do it and we all end up paying a little extra to do so. Don't have the city competing with private industries to provides WANTS instead of NEEDS. "

Bernie wrote on May 24, 2006 3:57 pm:
" You all need to realize that bits and bytes are as important of utility as water and electricity. Nebraska's publick power system has brought the state much lower rates than the rest of the country, as I understand, and it makes sense to explore the benefits of publicly operated broadband. To take the option off the table is a foolhardy move. "

Carly wrote on May 24, 2006 5:41 pm:
" This story is remarkable. It says definitively, without attribution, in the first few sentences, that government entities are needed to bring broadband to rural Nebraska. Oh, and then the third sentence says the legislature "threw a roadblock in the path of progress." It doesn't say that's someones opinion. It is stated as fact. If that's the reporting involved in the unbiased Journal-Star, I guess we don't need any contrary views. But I will add this: I want the City of Lincoln to begin providing broadband. Now. After seeing how badly they've handled ambulance service, I can't wait to see how badly they monkey with our Internet. Oh, and it will completely disrupt a fast-growing business, too. At least it would placate our monopoly newspaper. Let the mayhem begin! "

A.J. wrote on May 24, 2006 10:07 pm:
" This isn't about broadband in Lincoln, Omaha, Columbus, Kearney, Albion, McCook, Alliance, Wayne, or Scottsbluff. This is about Joe the farmer in the middle of Boone County or Bob in the middle of Wheeler County. The folks that aren't going to be reached by the service available in the cities. Lets face it Alltel isn't interested in providing the service to these remote areas. Let the state investigate the possibilities. Seems to me this is a lot like the questions people had about rural electrification and that worked out pretty well for Nebraska. "

captain obvious wrote on May 26, 2006 3:11 am:
" Carly, this is the editorial page. Every article is someone's opinion. It's supposed to be biased. Before you start ripping on the newspaper, try to figure out which section you're reading. "

Hjalmer wrote on May 27, 2006 11:13 am:
" I live within 20 miles of Lincoln and our only access to high speed internet is our own satellite dish that cost $400 for the equipment and more than twice the monthly cost a person in Lincoln pays. High speed internet could instead be on provided via our electrical service at a far lower cost except the legislature passed this law as a gift to the lobbyists. The lack of affordable high speed internet service to most of rural Nebraska further speeds the demise of those rural areas. "

What's Up LJS? wrote on May 28, 2006 7:27 am:
" I thought this was an editorial. Why does LJS keep censoring my comments any time they speak negatively of LJS? What are you afraid of; that everyone will agree and stop reading your paper? Don't worry, we are all stuck this paper in Lincoln. Otherwise I wouldn't be on here sounding off. I guess I will settle for reading your factless opinion columns for now. "