Now
Fair
73.0°
High
87°
Low
72°

Letters, 5/21: Some are morons

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Monday, May 22, 2006 - 10:25:08 am CDT

In regard to the law which allows citizens to carry a concealed weapon, I hope to see concealed weapons banned in Lincoln.

I read a recent letter to the editor, “Gun owners not morons,” which criticized Police Chief Tom Casady’s Local View column. After reading the letter I thought, “Oh, my God.” People like this want to carry concealed weapons. That may not be a good idea.

I thought Chief Casady’s commentary contained a lot of good common sense.

My husband, who is deceased, was a police officer in another city in Nebraska (not Lincoln). We had a discussion on this same subject several years ago when it had been brought up for discussion to become a state law.

He brought out the fact that if an individual is willing to carry a concealed weapon for protection against an attacker and is confronted by one, is he or she capable of using this gun on the attacker? If they find they are not able to do this, the attacker could very well take the gun away and use it on them instead.

I think this is a point well made.

Let the law enforcement personnel handle and deal with the “bad guys.”

I urge all citizens to think on this before making any definite decisions about this law.

Darlene Levos, Lincoln

Waste? Not!In response to Betty Bruno (letter, May 10) concerning the recent article about the Malcolm girls, “Hey, cruising is pricey as gas costs near $3 a gallon,” I’ve been waiting patiently for a public response, so thank you, Betty.

 

I’m sad to report those Malcolm girls continue to waste gas, going to track, volleyball, basketball and cross-country practice during the year, as well as band, speech, and Future Business Leaders of America events. Two in that car are in the National Honor Society as sophomores and three out of the four carry a 4.0 GPA. The last state FBLA event they even wasted extra gas carrying home a big heavy crystal trophy.

As far as any of the girls having a job to pay for gas, there isn’t a lot of time left in the day during the school year, but three out of four have applied for and been hired for summer employment. If those girls consume two gallons of gas on a Friday night going to the mall in a 30 mpg econobox, sorry, I guess those girls don’t work hard enough to deserve it.

You’re a product of the media and your Texas oil men leaders. Canada, next month, hosts the biggest oil/petroleum expo in the world in Calgary. I work in an engineering department for a local company that sends equipment to the show. Alberta oil sands are second only in oil reserves to Saudi Arabia. In five years, Canadian oil production will surpass Iraq potential levels.

America chooses their current path, there is an abundance of oil north of Montana, I’m all for conservation, I make my own bio-diesel fuel out of cooking oil, but you’re being duped.

Instead of attacking my parenting abilities and some high school girls’ mall trip, pick your battles, Betty, and propose something intelligent, a light-rail commuter train to Omaha, for instance, an alternative to a multi-million-dollar extra lane to handle the 4,000 cars a day on the corridor.

Bill Schneider, Malcolm

Moment of pride

On election day I was proud to be an American, for I saw democracy in action at the precinct that meets at a local Lincoln middle school. I saw a veteran in camouflage voting. Accompanying her were her two sons, one 8 years of age, the other 5 years of age.

The boys waited patiently as their mother secured her ballot, went to the ballot booth, made her selection and then came to place her ballot in the ballot box. At that time she called her sons to come and observe what she was doing.

Before she deposited the ballot from the ballot sleeve into the ballot box, she commented to her sons:

“I have made my choice as to the candidates running for offices and the amendments to be voted upon. My choices are listed on this ballot. Nobody stood beside me telling me for whom I should vote. I voted for the ones I felt were best qualified for the offices. And no one knows for whom I voted, I am the only one who knows.”

As she deposited the ballot into the ballot box she introduced herself and her two sons to the precinct inspector. As a citizen of 83 years of age I felt a real sense of pride for her, her two sons and the inspector, for it is a demonstration of what we hold dear as a people living in a land called the United States of America.

I don’t know if she has been or will be deployed in future days. One thing I do know — she availed herself to cast her vote in this election (which is both a privilege and a responsibility) and to share with her children the importance of voting.

My final comment — Would that more of our citizens would awaken as to the importance of voting.

Harold E. Hamilton, Lincoln

Campaigns necessary

Campaigning is the most important part of an election. I understand that some may think that the campaigners are annoying, but put yourself in their shoes. If you were up to win a major position against a very respected man, you would campaign every day of the week.

I just think that it is something that the people in Lincoln need to get used to. We are the state’s capital and there are going to be many campaigners to come. If you have the decency to vote, then the least you can do is accept the hard work of all the people that put their time and effort into making signs and petitioning to win the election.

Abby Delaney, Lincoln

Scoring a zero

The Lincoln Journal Star really has Lincoln’s best interest in mind. Let’s put out a Ground Zero and promote Omaha.

It was an interesting cover with the Ground Zero logo floating in the river (May 12). Must be the same river you have to cross to get to the casinos in Iowa.

Aldis Augstums, Lincoln

Is faith that weak?

After I finished reading “The Da Vinci debate” (LJS, May 13), I felt I had to respond.

Archbishop Angelo Amato, a Vatican official, voices the opinion that Dan Brown’s book, as well as the movie, must be viewed as an attack on Christianity and the Catholic Church. The Southern Nebraska Register, called the official newspaper of the Lincoln Diocese, tells Catholics they will be committing a mortal sin if they see the film. Father Mark Cyza, a priest at the Cathedral of the Risen Christ, states that both the book and movie are blasphemous. He is concerned that some Christians could be led astray, that Brown’s work can “sow the seeds of doubt.”

Is it the belief of Vatican officials, the Lincoln Diocese and Father Mark Cyza, as well as numerous other church leaders, that the Catholic Church and Christian religion in general are so weak, its adherents so tenuous in their beliefs, that this work of fiction will throw the universe as they know it into chaos?

Aren’t there far greater ills surrounding us each day that can and should be addressed by church leaders other than this Da Vinci tempest? When men worship at the altar of power and money, when there are people who are hungry, who are homeless, and so many other areas of true concern, should the call to arms of Christians really have such a shallow focus?

I am not one who is fanatical about religion, whatever form it takes. I am one, however, who is stunned by this incredible fear that this one fictional novel has evoked.

If faith can move mountains, sustain us through Sept. 11, provide strength for all who are heavy laden, and keep us looking upward and forward, surely it is strong enough to withstand a few questions.

Bob Pinkerton, Weeping Water


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Chris wrote on May 21, 2006 7:30 am:
" Wow Darlene...have you not read the bill that was passed? These people have to go through a training course that will include the handling of a gun and ammunition, shooting fundamentals, handgun laws, ways to avoid and handle violent confrontations and proper storage of handguns. Most of the people that are going to apply for this are your fellow law-abiding citizens. This bill wont stop those criminals out there who already carry... "

Lauren wrote on May 21, 2006 8:47 am:
" Great letter Bob! You hit it right on! Wouldn't it be great if the energy wasted on being fearful of women making their own moral decisions and of people attending a fictional movie could be channeled toward overcoming poverty and hunger and stemming the violence that produces war. Just as Jesus wept over Jerusalem before he entered that great City, he must be weeping over his church and the nations of the world in these days. "

Scott F. Gregory wrote on May 21, 2006 9:10 am:
" Harold E. Hamilton's letter shows what this nation is all about. In an age of apathy and cynicism, it's great to hear of a story where people take their civi duty seriously and faithfully. Nice letter Mr. Hamilton. "

Josh wrote on May 21, 2006 10:34 am:
" It is all about power. The Catholic Church loves to censor and stifle debate. Mortal sin for seeing a movie? Puhlease.....if they are so worried about mortal sins, the church would not be spending millions on the child abuse scandals....... "

JBD wrote on May 21, 2006 11:08 am:
" Darlene, you are more than welcome to let the police handle the bad guys if you want to. But being the spouse of a police officer you have to know that it will be after you have been savagely raped and left for dead. You have to know that it will be after the carjacker has stolen your vehicle with your kids or grandkids in it. You have to know that it will be in the emergency room after the thug who wanted your purse stabbed you because you didn't hand it over fast enough. Get the point? I doubt it, but hey that is life, I do not tell you you have to carry a concealed firearm I only ask that you respect my decision and don't tell me I can't. The Police do a fantastic job, but for the most part they can't be there to protect you all they can do is show up after it is over and write the reports and render assistance. Maybe they will catch them maybe they won't, but the victims will still have to live with the aftermath of mental and physical injuries. Those that speak the loudest seem to be the ones that have never experienced the horror of violent crime up close and personal. Carrying a concealed firearm is not about punishing an offender, taking the law into ones own hands or depriving the police of doing their job. Carrying a concealed firearm allows an honest law abiding citizen the means to protect themselves when the police are not there or couldn't get there in time anyway. When it is over they can show up and write all the reports they want What your saying is that we should all submit to rape, robbery, shootings, stabbings and the kidnapping of our children. I don't know about anyone else but in my mind that goes against everything that this great country was founded on. "

Eric wrote on May 21, 2006 12:02 pm:
" I agree very much with Bob about religion and how the priorities it takes are so far out of whack with real problems. The Catholic Church has historically been pretty bent to the fanatical right and seems more interested in simply controlling the people that it can easily control, rather than get anything done. I've pushed a lot of these types of people out of my life over the years, after becoming so frustrated with their inability to ever make a decision on their own - everything was coming back to "What the Church Thinks." And frankly, the church thinks that no one should have free choice about anything anymore, and would rather continue ignoring poverty, divorce, greed, and sadness as well. "

Lindsay wrote on May 21, 2006 12:10 pm:
" Nicely put Mr. Pinkerton. I feel just as baffled as you do to the controversy. It's frightening that there are so many people unwilling to question their beliefs. More times than not, asking those questions only strengthen your faith. "

Kurt wrote on May 21, 2006 12:54 pm:
" Mr. Pinkerton, You are mistaking 'fear' for caution. I don't know how much you know of the Catholic faith, but I am Catholic and the content of the film is blasphemous to our Catholic faith. Blasphemy is considered gravely wrong. Knowingly engaging is something that is gravely wrong is a mortal sin based on our Catholic catechism. That being said, our priests and bishop have an obligation to inform us that this film is blasphemous since, through obedience, our priests and bishop provide guidance to us. Your point that they believe our faith is tenous and that we don't have concern for all the social ills around us is ludicrous. You are stunned at the response? I'm stunned anyone would write garbage like the Davinci Code. "

LIndsay wrote on May 21, 2006 7:31 pm:
" Kurt: The odd thing is that there are many people who are basing their decisions on why not to read the book or not to see the movie on hearsay, not because they came to the conclusion themselves that it is "blasphemous." I am Catholic, and I read the book long before this controversy came to a head, and I didn't find it blasphemous, just merely interesting theory. I think a great many churches around here have done the right thing, encouraging their congregations to read it and discuss it. But the iron-fisted approach the Lincoln Diocese has taken to this movie is not only insulting to the intellegence of their parishoners, but it keeps parishoners from examining their faith further and discussing it amongst other Catholics. If it's so blasphemous, shouldn't it be read to understand better what is blasphmous to the church? I wouldn't reccomend Mein Kampf as nightly bedside reading, but even that has importance of gaining insight into Hitler's madness. Opus Dei was made out terribly in the novel, but even that organization has an open minded approach and has encouraged people to see the movie and then go on and learn about their organization. Sadly, the rest of the church is using what could be a great teaching tool to try to control members as they did in the dark ages. "

anonymous wrote on May 21, 2006 7:52 pm:
" Kurt, I agree with you! "

mp wrote on May 21, 2006 9:06 pm:
" Kurt...How do you know that the Da Vinci Code is blasphemous? Have you seen it or are do you just assume it is because someone said so? I suggest you see it before you make such a statement. I haven't seen it so I cannot say either way. JBD...So you think the world is safer with you carrying a concealed weapon. Are you faster than a speeding bullet? The only thing you will do when they rob you is put another weapon in the hands of criminals. I can just see you when someone tries to hold you up and you say "Wait a minute. I have a concealed weapon and let me pull it out so I can stop you." Sounds funny doesn't it. Just like your argument that you will stop crime because you are carrying a weapon. I have been a police officer and I know from experience you are no match for someone who is intent on robbing you or doing something worse whether you are armed and trained or not. Darlene is right, let the trained police officer handle crime. They have far better and more training than you will ever have in a gun class. "

JBD wrote on May 22, 2006 2:25 pm:
" I do not think the world will be safer if I am carry a concealed firearm, I believe that my family and I are safer when I am carrying a concealed firearm and that is all that matters to me. You kind enough to mention that you have been a police officer and that you know from experience that I, Me, JBD personally are no match for someone intent on doing me harm. I find it incredulous that a police officer would make such an assumption without evidence to back that up. I am 49 years old and have for more than 30 years carried a firearm either backed by a badge or a CCW permit. I am possibly better trained than a large number of officers and I am also a certified instructor. I am fully aware of my capabilities. "

Tim wrote on May 22, 2006 6:57 pm:
" I wonder how many peace officers would like to see alcohol more tightly regulated in the name of "public safety." Or how many of them would like to see "search and seizure" laws liberalized in the name of "public safety." Not to disrepect law enforcement in any way but they DO have a different outlook on the general public. Police in other states had the same qualms as do Nebraska peace officers, but now many of them have a different opinion after years of experience has shown that legal CCW has had little impact on them and their jobs. "