Now
Overcast
76.0°
High
87°
Low
68°

Letters, 5/12: Save the trees

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

Friday, May 12, 2006 - 12:10:02 am CDT

In 1992, I started the first of several Natural Resources District tree grants that brought hundreds of street trees to my West A neighborhood, schools and local park.

The crowning achievement to all my street tree projects is a beautiful lane of 45 chanticleer pears and 15 prairie fire crabs along Coddington Avenue. All of my trees are important to me, but this particular stand of trees is a beautiful source of pride, not only for me, but for my whole neighborhood.

In order for me to get these NRD grants, I had to work closely with the city of Lincoln to get approval for the planting of these street trees. I was assured that even if Coddington Avenue was widened, these trees were planted far enough back from the street that they would be out of harm’s way.

Well, guess what? The city wants to widen Coddington to five lanes of traffic. Four passing and one turning lane, with some kind of median and a trail included that will lead to Pioneers Park. Does anyone see the sense in wiping out so many trees to build a trail to the park?

If they go forward with this plan, we will lose our sidewalks, trees and possibly part of our backyards.

Along with the loss of our trees, I feel that five lanes of traffic will insure that Coddington becomes a major road. If you build it, they will come. Heavier traffic, more noise, faster drivers, more accidents. This is a neighborhood road. We don’t want a super highway smack in the middle of our community.

The city is full of busy neighborhood streets that are only three lanes wide. Please let Coddington be one of these roads and save the integrity of our neighborhood.

Linda Vollenweider, Lincoln

Guns about rights

I disagree with most of what Police Chief Tom Casady had to say in his Local View on the Opinion Page May 2.

It’s easy to generalize and say the right to carry concealed handguns is unnecessary or not needed in Lincoln, but the question isn’t about need for the general public, it’s about “rights for the individual.”

Does a woman who is scared for her life and has a protection order against a violent ex-boyfriend/husband have a right to take some training classes and carry a concealed handgun for self-defense? Casady and Mayor Coleen Seng apparently don’t think so. I think she should have that right if she chooses and she meets all the requirements.

Casady also says one of his biggest concerns is loopholes that would allow people convicted of “stalking, violating a protection order, indecent exposure and impersonating a police officer” to get a permit because those are misdemeanors and not felonies.

The solution to that is to change those laws making those crimes felonies. That needs to be addressed, and I hope Casady and Seng put some time and effort into that.

Dale Smid, Lincoln

We’re not the enemy

I’m glad we have people like letter writer Joseph Vocht looking out for the welfare of the Israeli lobby and religious fanatics. (By the way, I’m neither.) If we extrapolate his view into our new foreign policy, I’ll have to switch jobs to selling prayer rugs and bomb vests.

Apparently, Vocht won’t figure it out until there is a radioactive mushroom cloud over Los Angeles or Miami. Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has vowed to annihilate Israel and the West. (That means the United States, to you progressives.)

What kind of misery will we experience after a suitcase dirty bomb detonates in some metropolitan area? In Vocht’s eyes, the United States is the bully, so I guess we will have deserved it.

I do agree with Vocht that this country has lost its spine. If Mahmoud doesn’t terminate his nuclear weapons program and stop sharing their technology with other radical Islamic states, I just hope we find our backbone and turn his weapons sites to rubble. I make no apologies for wanting to defend this country and our way of life.

In case some of you haven’t figured it out yet, we have real enemies out there, and it won’t matter who’s in the White House, and diplomacy won’t work with these terrorists.

Kelly Sieb, Lincoln

Solution is to conserve

These days, whether you are reading the newspaper, watching the local news or CNN, or talking to your neighbor, a favorite topic of conversation is gas prices. Unfortunately, while we are paying more at the pump, oil companies are enjoying record profits and politicians in Washington are offering few solutions.

Several of our congressmen continue to push opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as an option to reduce gas prices. Talk about beating a dead horse. According to the Department of Energy, drilling in the Arctic Refuge would save consumers only about a penny a gallon in about 20 years.

The one solution that Congress has yet to seriously consider is making new cars, SUVs and other light trucks average 40 miles per gallon. By doing this within the next 10 years, the average driver would save about $2,200 at the gas pump over the life of the vehicle. Taking this step would save more oil than we currently import from the entire Persian Gulf or could ever get out of the Arctic Refuge, combined.

We don’t need our elected officials to think of more ways to help out the oil and gas industry. We need them to put American innovation to work and help consumers. Using existing technology to make our cars, trucks and SUVs get more miles per gallon, we could save money at the pump and protect special places from needless drilling.

Cammy Watkins, Sierra Club, Omaha

Isn’t that just grand?

Am I the only citizen who wonders what is wrong with the picture of enduring alliances among former Mayor Don Wesely, current Mayor Coleen Seng and Douglas Theatres?

Now we read that after the a Wesely/Seng-orchestrated, financially disastrous switch from private ambulance service to Lincoln Fire Department service, and after the eminent domain creation of The Grand, owned (through tax increment financing) and operated by Douglas (as is every other screen in Lincoln), Seng now supports a high-rise and civic center proposal which — how amazingly — buys Douglas Theatre’s now nearly worthless properties downtown for millions of dollars.

Am I the only one who is concerned?

Joseph W. Johnson Jr., Lincoln


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Letters > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
CS wrote on May 12, 2006 1:03 am:
" How is it any more fair for the city to not compensate Douglas Theatres for the Starship while they negotiate with local business owners on the other end of the block? It was built years ago, and not with 'tax increment financing' like the Grand. You had your chance to discuss it at city council meetings before it was built-its just as much your fault. Douglas didn't want to build downtown but turing down the offer they got from the city council would have been a ludicrous business decision. "

Tammy wrote on May 12, 2006 7:13 am:
" Kelly...I expect to see you at your local recruiters office any minute now. "

Locke wrote on May 12, 2006 7:13 am:
" I have always wondered about the relationship between the city of Lincoln and Douglas Theatres. It seems like a state supported monopoly to me. Because of cleverly designed zoning resrictions, the only alternatives one has to see a movie besides the Douglas Theatres are UNL arts theatre, the Ross, or driving to Omaha. While both are good alternatives, it would be nice to have a true alternative within the limits of Lincoln. Perhaps the city council and the mayor will finally get out from under the thumb of Douglas Theatres and provide us with a real alternative. "

dtw wrote on May 12, 2006 7:47 am:
" Kelly it sounds like your mind has been overtaken by FEAR. Boy, if I was a politican I could make your head turn any which way I please. "

Lynn wrote on May 12, 2006 8:08 am:
" Linda, Your letter is right on. Just ask the folks who live on S. Cotner Highway, poor souls. "

Lynn wrote on May 12, 2006 8:17 am:
" Joseph, you hit the nail right on the head. This is the most corrupt city administration I have ever seen in my 50+ years. One only needs to go to the city's web site and check out the city contracts some of the rich folks who run this town hold. It's enough to make you sick! There are about three folks who run this town, and none of them are the mayor. She's a puppet to the big bucks, and always has been. Does she care about you and I, our tax burden, our jobs?? No. Does she listen to anyone worth less than a couple million? No. Are you the only one who is concerned? No, at last count, I found about six of us. "

Larry wrote on May 12, 2006 9:03 am:
" Joseph I think you are the only one concerned. "

LOL wrote on May 12, 2006 9:03 am:
" OMG! I had to laugh when I read the title "Save the trees". In Lincoln? When will that ever happen? "

Gary wrote on May 12, 2006 9:05 am:
" Joseph, to answer your question...no, you're not the only one. The mayoral election couldn't come soon enough...that is, assuming things will change from one mayor to the next. I pray that they do. "

Josh wrote on May 12, 2006 9:17 am:
" Kelly, the problem with that argument is that we (the U.S.) have lost most of our credibility in the world- we claim that a place is a great threat to our security so we go in with guns blazing, against the wishes of much of the rest of the world (because these things are international situations- never to be gone about alone) when the truth- seen by many the whole time, realized by most others after the fact- is that these places were no threat at all. What Iran has been doing lately is nothing more than sabre rattling, just trying to get a rise out of us.... but let's say they do indeed become a threat- will we have any clout left in this world to pull together worldwide support for any possible missions to knock out Iran's weapons? And if we do go at it alone, we need to make sure we have undeniable evidence, not this fake photoshop-edited stuff that Bush and his staff threw together during the leadup to the Iraq invasion. That's how it works in this world, when you are planning to do something that will undoubtedly cost many innocent civillian lives, you need to make sure you are without a doubt, 200% sure that it is necessary, and this needs to be proven to the entire world otherwise we will just fall back into that "bully" category that much of the world has seen us as for quite some time. You might ask why we care what the rest of the world thinks? Well, it' simple- we share this planet with many other nations/people, and we have no more right to do things to other nations than anybody else does, regardless of how much money and firepower we have. So we need to make a darn good case for it if we do feel the need to attack someone. And if we don't keep ourselves in good standing internationally, then the time could come where some superpower at some time in the future attacks us, gives us more than we can handle.... and the rest of the world stands by, reluctant to get involved because we're "getting what we deserve" for being a bully for so long. Of course that is not how I'd see it, but this is a possible scenario. "

dtw wrote on May 12, 2006 10:11 am:
" I totally agree with Josh. Afterall, America will not be the world's supreme power for all eternity. Hey, you know what the Greeks, Mongols, Romans, Egyptians, and British all had in common? They all thought they would rule the world forever. I for one would like to see America stay at the top a little longer then our near future is promissing. Bush and his administration are hindering this country, not protecting it. If you are really that ignorant to believe that America can take on the world all by itself, you really need to stop watching FOX NEWS and start doing some research on your own. "

Kristi wrote on May 12, 2006 12:11 pm:
" I agree with Josh and DTW, generally speaking. To be slightly dramatic, the upcoming demise of the United States is one of my concerns and my main hope is that I don't live to see it. I don't know if we can hold it off that long, though. "

Lindsay wrote on May 13, 2006 8:01 pm:
" Iran's nuclear technology is still in the beginning processes. It would be mighty difficult for any country to drop a nuke on us with the type of defenses we have. That's why Al-queda sent men into commercial airline jets to attack this country. What Kelly doesn't understand is that since 9-11 we have made far many more enemies than friends in the world through half-baked foreign policy. Maybe you don't care what other people think of us, but next time something happens to us we might not have very much sympathy from the international community. "