Now
A Few Clouds
82.0°
High
84°
Low
66°

Gov. turns back Osborne

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By DON WALTON / Lincoln Journal Star

Wednesday, May 10, 2006 - 12:39:40 am CDT

Gov. Dave Heineman edged past Rep. Tom Osborne late Tuesday night to win the battle of GOP titans. Full coverage & vote results at Election 2006

Osborne phoned Heineman with his congratulations, both men addressed their cheering supporters in Lincoln hotel ballrooms, and Nebraska’s most dramatic primary election contest in memory was over well before midnight.

While Osborne captured populous Omaha and Lincoln, Heineman sealed his victory in rural counties and key population centers in western and central Nebraska’s critical Republican battleground.

Story Photo
Gov. Dave Heineman celebrates. (AP)

Related Media

Map of governor's race: A county-by-county breakdown

A county-by-county breakdown of the governor's race...

Related Link(s):

Those communities — Grand Island, Kearney, Hastings and Columbus — are in Osborne’s 3rd District.

Osborne, the three-term congressman and former Nebraska football coach, was winning North Platte and Scottsbluff.

Addressing a jubilant crowd at The Cornhusker, Heineman said all Nebraskans share “enormous respect for what (Osborne) has done for our state,” pointing in particular to his lifelong work in helping young people.

“What an incredible victory!” the governor said later in an interview.

“You never totally see it coming, but in the last three or four weeks I could feel the energy and excitement growing.”

Osborne told his supporters at the Embassy Suites he hopes some of the ideas he advanced to make the state more competitive will bear fruit.

If so, he said, the effort will have been worthwhile.

“This is a tough one to take,” Osborne acknowledged. “It’s hard. It’s hard to lose the last one.”

The defeat probably spells the end of a brief six-year political career for the man who gained a state’s affection and gratitude by winning three national football championships in the 1990s.

Later, in an interview, Osborne said he hopes Nebraskans “will pull together behind the governor.”

The struggle for the GOP gubernatorial nod produced a classic confrontation between the celebrity congressman and an incumbent governor who held the endorsement of key GOP interest groups along with the support of Sen. Chuck Hagel.

Fighting to retain a grip on the governorship he inherited when Mike Johanns resigned last year to become U.S. secretary of agriculture, Heineman employed the skills he honed as a longtime party activist to transform what once appeared to be a slam-dunk for the popular Osborne into an even match.

Heineman, who turns 58 on Friday, is regarded as a consummate political strategist and tactician, and he has governed with an eye on this election showdown.

Osborne, 69, didn’t enter politics until 2000, when he won the first of three House races in the 3rd District. Prior to that, he was head coach at Nebraska for 25 years, stepping down in 1997 after winning his third national title in four years.

The winner of the GOP race will face Democratic nominee David Hahn, a 50-year-old Lincoln attorney and Internet entrepreneur, in the November general election.

Finishing third in the Republican battle was Omaha financial adviser Dave Nabity, who mounted a gritty uphill fight.

Heineman, former lieutenant governor and former state treasurer, gained the support of the Nebraska Farm Bureau, Nebraska Right to Life and the National Rifle Association in his bid to defeat Osborne.

Those three interest groups have been vital in contested GOP primary races in the past and helped even the race.

As governor, Heineman constructed a record that included major new job creation legislation, and he presided over tax cuts earlier this year.

But it was the political impact of two gubernatorial vetoes that appeared to lift him into a late surge, especially in Osborne’s congressional district.

Heineman’s opposition to Class I rural school reorganization and the granting of resident college tuition rates to the children of illegal immigrants cut into Osborne’s support.

Osborne declined to sign referendum petitions seeking voter repeal of the rural school legislation and said he would have signed the resident tuition bill.

While Heineman appeared to benefit politically from those differences, Osborne pointed to a 14 percent state spending increase under the governor’s leadership and promised a performance-based audit of state agencies and programs to achieve spending reductions.

Reduced taxes are not sustainable at the current rate of state spending, Osborne said, and state government already is on course to another fiscal shortfall.

Osborne proposed a new university-based initiative in bioscience and called for tax incentives to encourage venture capital in the state.

A key element of Osborne’s message has been a stronger assault on methamphetamine traffic and reform of the state’s troubled foster care system.

Nabity, 47, proposed sharp reductions in taxes and state spending, promising to “scrub government like you prune a bush.”

Hahn has waited out of the spotlight for the Republican winner, pledging to engage the GOP nominee on fundamental issues rather than what he called “sloganeering.”

In coming days, he has promised to roll out detailed plans for property tax reduction, health care reform and use of economic tax incentives to help fund college education.

Reach Don Walton at 473-7248 or at dwalton@journalstar.com. L. Kent Wolgamott contributed to this story.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Top Story > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Jim H. wrote on May 9, 2006 11:54 pm:
" The people I knew that changed party's did so to vote for Heineman not Osborne. "

JKal wrote on May 10, 2006 1:09 am:
" We weren't supposed to beat Miami in '94 and look what happened. Congrats, Governer Heineman "

Reagan wrote on May 10, 2006 1:15 am:
" I'm very upset at what Heineman did with the school districts in Omaha. Osborne never would have done something so embarassing to the state of Nebraska. Osborne will always have my support. "

Stacey wrote on May 10, 2006 6:26 am:
" If there hadn't been the brain drain of people from Nebraska, perhaps Osborne would have won. "

Rose wrote on May 10, 2006 6:56 am:
" AMEN, Jim H wrote "people he knew that changed party's did so to vote Heineman - I was one! Felt like I should have been at Heineman's Victory Party - Congratulations Nebraska you'd did not let Football rule the state. Go Governor Go..... "

Bill wrote on May 10, 2006 7:03 am:
" O well, didn't matter if Heineman or Osborne got in. Either way this state is headed in the wrong direction. Lower taxes? will never happen. Less spending? HAHAHA your kidding right!? Get your check books out. Is the state ready for this fun adventure. Probably not when you look at the fact Nebraska has one of the lowest income rates per family house hold in the country!! Awake up Nebraska "

Interesting wrote on May 10, 2006 7:57 am:
" Whoever ran Osborne's campaign in Lancaster county (alone, not the whole campaign, just the county) should be commended. 52-42 in Lancaster, the home of the state government, for Osborne? Wow. "

GOPMachine wrote on May 10, 2006 8:27 am:
" It's a great day for special interests! Stand back in awe of the power of the GOP political machine and it's many lobbyists which will now reap the rewards of their great victory! Woe be unto you who does not obligate yourself to the many monied power brokers! "

Dana wrote on May 10, 2006 8:34 am:
" I can't understand people who support someone that turns his back on the ones who pay the taxes to keep a state running but instead supports the illgals who want what this country has to offer but won't even speak our language. I apoligize to Tom Osborn for the stupidity of this state. "

Jonathan wrote on May 10, 2006 8:51 am:
" Hope a 14 percent state spending increase doesn't unearth more Loralee Byrds. It's really imperative that Osborne's suggestion of a performance-based audit of state agencies takes place. We have some real slackers at the helm right now. Let's appoint some people with the credentials to actually track where the money is going. Start with DAS. My respect level for Governor Heineman would increase dramatically if he actually implemented such an idea. "

Kevin wrote on May 10, 2006 8:56 am:
" Nebraska Republicans blew it and did so by their own apathy. 268,940 people voted in the Republican Gubernatorial race yesterday. 578,888 were registered. 309,948 voices chose to remain silent. I am depressed. "

Sharon wrote on May 10, 2006 9:01 am:
" I didn't change parties to vote for Heineman that's for sure, and neither did most of the people that I know! "

Ken Handy wrote on May 10, 2006 9:02 am:
" Good story. I got all the information I was looking for. Thanks. "

Genee & Norm Godden wrote on May 10, 2006 9:03 am:
" This is a huge loss to the State of Nebraska. Tom is so honest, dedicated and of tremendous intellectual ability. Nebrasks needs a man with these qualifications. "

Jim wrote on May 10, 2006 9:35 am:
" I love how people get angry with their 'I'm right, you're wrong' attitude. All of you upset with the outcome, the majority has spoken and just because the outcome wasn't the way you wanted it doesn't mean it's wrong. Kevin is one of few in this forum with a valid point 46% of registered Republicans voted. "

Glyn wrote on May 10, 2006 9:35 am:
" Someone who would change their political party to vote for a man who won some football games has some issues with their beliefs and morals. If they believe in what Tom Osborne stands for why in the hell are they in the democratic party. "

Mark wrote on May 10, 2006 9:41 am:
" If ever I believed anyone who stated that they voted for the 'candidate' and not the party, Tom O is it. Who has had his principles put to the test in public more than he has? And its those principles that cross party lines. "

Dave. wrote on May 10, 2006 10:16 am:
" Forgive me, but I am confused. Which of the candidates supported the granting of resident college tuition rates to the children of illegal immigrants? "

Marie wrote on May 10, 2006 10:33 am:
" Two words sum up why I couldn't vote for Coach Osborne: KATE WITEK "

Connie wrote on May 10, 2006 11:02 am:
" I live across the border and sent my daughter to the University of Nebraska and paid triple out of state tuition. Would it be fair for illegal aliens to pay in state tuition. I my opinion that is why Osborne lost. "

Donna K. wrote on May 10, 2006 11:09 am:
" All the people I know who changed partisanship did it to keep Heineman and "send Tom packing". Osborne was an excellent coach, but, lacks in politics. "

Jerry wrote on May 10, 2006 12:11 pm:
" It is hard to say what quality of Governor Tom would have been. However, it is readily apparent that he would not have been owned by corporations, money interests and the political hacks. Reducing tutition of children of aliens makes sense: citizens can get grants and loans, lets not educate the poorer illegal that "we" have encouraged to come with job offers, rather lets shut education doors but leave the path to poverty and crime open. "

Marilynn wrote on May 10, 2006 1:18 pm:
" This must be a sad day in Nebraska. How often does a state get a chance for the right and the honest to become the model? Once in a lifetime, and you just let it slip by! You chose powerful lobbyists and a school reform plan in Omaha that should be an embarrassment to every Nebraskan! "

Rudy wrote on May 10, 2006 2:34 pm:
" It's really unfortunate. Osborne is a person whom you would never had to worry about selling out to anybody, especially interest groups. He is for people, not business. But why would the GOP care about people when they never have before. So, go ahead and make illegal immigrant's CHILDREN pay the costs for decisions their parents made. That's a great way of welcoming immigrants and a great way to encourage assimilation. Hey, why don't we just re-segregate everything and go back in time what do you think? We are on track, the WRONG track! "

Darrel wrote on May 10, 2006 4:28 pm:
" He didnt support NRA ! enought said "

fb wrote on May 10, 2006 5:02 pm:
" I got the sense after reading these posts that Nebraska lost a football game and trying to find someone to blame besides coach Osborne. Osborne gives the impression that he would not sell out to special interst but he is in the pockets like all politicians. Remember when he was head football coach, he had to court the big spenders to fund his football program. You don't do that without strings attached and playing favorites. Also remember some of the upstanding football players he had on his teams like the Peters brothers and Lawrence Phillips to name a few. A man of integrity would have kicked them off the team on the first infraction and not let them come back in order to win a national championship. Get over it TO supporters, he is a great football coach but a lousy politician. The state finally figured that out and sent Tom into retirement like he said he wanted to do when he quit football. "

DC Blake wrote on May 10, 2006 6:38 pm:
" The apathy expressed by voters says to me that the majority of registered voters didn't think there was a fix with either side. That the problems of Nebraska are either hopeless OR not "their" problem to fix...a truly sad tale, regardless of victor. In my opinion your state got the "best" candidate available...also a sad tale. "

JJ wrote on May 11, 2006 11:43 pm:
" Why not outlaw career politicians? If we as a society would elect people that have real life experience (real jobs, and football coach is not a real job) we would all be better off. The problem is there are too few people making too many decisions and noone can make even half the population happy. Osborne would have done just fine, Heineman has done a good job. Everyone who is not in charge will have some sort of problem with whoever is. It's human nature. It seems to me that we all expect everyone else to make all our decisions and then we all complain weither we vote or not. Ideally we could vote for all choices but there really is no chance of that. We wouldn't go anyway. "