Now
Fair
57°
High
87°
Low
63°

Concealed-carry adopted

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By NATE JENKINS / Lincoln Journal Star

Thursday, Mar 30, 2006 - 06:11:27 pm CST

Next year, roughly 20,000 Nebraskans may trade their pepper spray and knives for Rugers and live ammo. Ending  a 10-year effort, the Legislature on Thursday passed a law giving law-abiding Nebraskans the right to carry concealed handguns.

“It’s been a long fight,” said Sen. Jeanne Combs of Milligan.

Combs, a shoot-from-the-hip speaker and member of the National Rifle Association who led the fight for the bill, stared at the big board on the floor of the Legislature as votes to break a filibuster piled up.

Story Photo
State Sens. Jeanne Combs (right) and DiAnna Schimek, on opposite sides of the issue, hugged after Combs' concealed carry passed. (Robert Becker)

When the tally hit 33, it was clear Nebraska would soon change its status as one of just a few states that prohibit concealed guns.

“I think it gives the people who’ve been victims of crime at least an alternative,” she said later.

The bill goes to Gov. Dave Heineman, who has said he would sign it.

Senators who have opposed the legislation fought it until the final vote, forcing the filibuster-breaker.

“There is no justification for it which would be considered rational,” said Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha. “Nebraska is not engulfed in a crime wave.”

The  Nebraska State Patrol did not take a stance on the bill. The Police Officers Association of Nebraska opposes the measure.

Sen. Joel Johnson of Kearney questioned why the “safest people in the safest place on Earth” — Nebraska — need to carry concealed guns.

Supporters were mostly quiet, content to let opponents take their last shots at the bill and allow Combs to answer their questions.

She gave varying answers to a question that especially interested senators  and is expected to interest city leaders as the law’s January start date approaches: Will it prevent cities from passing their own ordinances banning concealed handguns?

“As I understand the bill, it is preemptive” and would prohibit cities from overriding state law, Combs said, answering a question from Chambers.

Earlier this month, Combs suggested it may not prevent cities from banning concealed guns.

After the vote Thursday, Combs said she was “not an attorney” and wasn’t sure what the effect of the law will be in cities across the state.

“It remains to be seen,” she said. “My intent was not to have a checkerboard of laws.”

Sen. DiAnna Schimek of Lincoln  pointed out an apparent discrepancy between what Combs told Chambers and what the bill seems to spell out.

“I think it says right here in your own bill that indeed they have that authority” to pass their own anti-conceal-carry laws and override state law, Schimek said.

None of the 38 states with similar legislation allow cities to opt out of state law, said Keith Wood, an NRA lobbyist who has pushed for this bill and is familiar with conceal-carry bills.

But Nebraska’s bill is different, he has said, because he believes it does allow cities to ban concealed weapons.

Lincoln Mayor Coleen Seng and Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey wrote letters to the Legislature last month expressing opposition to the bill.

Lincoln officials are considering their next move, said Seng aide Rick Hoppe.

“The mayor wants to take time to review the city’s options before making a decision,” he said.

Without widespread city bans, the State Patrol has estimated 19,500 Nebraskans would apply for permits next year, when the law goes into effect. And about 5,000 would apply annually after that.

Applicants will have to pass background checks and meet other criteria to obtain the $100 permits, which will have to be renewed every five years.

Reach Nate Jenkins at 473-7223 or njenkins@journalstar.com.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Top Story > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
Ed wrote on March 30, 2006 4:22 pm:
" Wow, another reason to be so proud to be a Nebraskan. Those who want to carry will, those who don't, wont? What about those who don't want to be shot or share space with people 'packing heat'? What rights do we have not to be in constant threat from a nut with a gun? The first death caused by a person carrying concealed should go on the Senator's who voted for its obituary. "

Wm wrote on March 30, 2006 4:23 pm:
" A majority of senators voted yes. Not the population. Should have been on a ballot. It will be okay until one of those gun carrying selfish egotists decides to do something stupid. What goes around comes around. "

Andrew wrote on March 30, 2006 4:28 pm:
" Concealed weapons make me wanna hug people too. "

Gary wrote on March 30, 2006 4:29 pm:
" About time. "

Judy Cantrell wrote on March 30, 2006 5:02 pm:
" I am so happy I left Nebraska and moved out of Jeanne Combs district! "

Dan wrote on March 30, 2006 5:29 pm:
" Those that feel the need to conceal a weapon are exactly the type of people we wouldn't want to conceal weapons. "

KS wrote on March 30, 2006 5:45 pm:
" Ed: What rights do we have not to be in constant threat from a nut with a gun? That threat has always existed. Do you think the law really stops the bad guys from packing? Now law abiding people who feel the need to carry for the safety of them or their families can (and yes there are many situations where a law abiding citizen carrying a weapon is a good idea). Besides, if a person wanted to kill someone, why in the world would they take a $300 traning course, submit to a background check, get fingerprinted, and pay a $100 fee for the license? The people going through all of this trouble are NOT the ones you should be worried about. These are the people that could save your life someday. Further, look at the other 46 states who have had CCW for years, crime rates DROPPED in every single one after the adoption of CCW. Criminals are afraid of people who can defend themselves. "

Bill wrote on March 30, 2006 5:48 pm:
" Of all the problems Nebraska has, carrying a gun is the least of them. I resent the NRA lobbyists coming in here and steering the legislature into a stupid blunder. Sen. Combs should be retired. "

don't mess with me wrote on March 30, 2006 6:21 pm:
" I might be packin' heat. "

Alison wrote on March 30, 2006 6:31 pm:
" Good point by KS. The people who are going to use concealed weapons to commit criminal acts are already carrying concealed weapons against the law. I don't plan to carry a concealed weapon, just because it will be legal, but I strongly support this measure. The statistics speak for themselves. "

Mike wrote on March 30, 2006 6:41 pm:
" "There are many situations where a law abiding citizen carrying a weapon is a good idea." Please KS make me a list. I discussed the Bill with Senator Combs today and asked her where does a normal citizen of the state of Nebraska need to carry a gun? She described a trip down I-80 where she might stop at a rest area. "To feel safe I might carry a weapon on trip like this," said the Senator. Wow, we better notify other State Departments and have the rest areas signed, BE SAFE, CARRY A WEAPON. I asked if she had any other examples, and she commented wherever you might drive. I asked the Senator, “should I carry a weapon to the store, to drop off my kids at school, or when I go to work?” She said maybe to all of the above. I hope she notifies the school before attending conferences. If the 33 Senators that voted yes on this bill start carrying a weapon, put the word out, watch out for idiots with weapons. "

Jim Winney (Layton Utah) wrote on March 30, 2006 7:01 pm:
" Congratulations to Senator Combs on her fine accomplishment. To Senator Schimeck and Mayor Seng of Lincoln I would urge you to take a wait and see attitude before irrationally taking action against the bill. Give it two years and see if your crime rate goes up or down. The CCW laws in Utah work very well and have reduced violent crime. I would urge you to contact the authorities in Utah and see how many violent crimes were committed by CCW weapon holders. The state has a right to revoke a permit at any time and to revoke renewal and I am sure your bill does too. I grew up in Lincoln and in the next four months I plan to retire in Lincoln area and I do support Senator Combs in her efforts. Truley a defender of the U.S. Constitution and the 2nd Amendment. I would have the Chief of Police talk with the Chief of Police of Salt Lake or of the Utah Highway Patrol and let the professionals come to an opinion based on knowledge and not fear tactics from either side. Again, to the Senators and Governor - job well done. Jim Winney Layton, Utah "

Guns and Roses wrote on March 30, 2006 7:17 pm:
" "There are many situations where a law abiding citizen carrying a weapon is a good idea." Please KS make me a list. I discussed the Bill with a Senator today and asked where does a normal citizen of the state of Nebraska need to carry a gun? They described a trip down I-80 where a stop at a rest area might be necessary. "To feel safe I might carry a weapon on trip like this," said the Senator. Wow, we better notify other State Departments and have the rest areas signed, BE SAFE, CARRY A WEAPON. I asked if there were other examples, and they commented wherever you might drive. I asked the Senator, “should I carry a weapon to the store, to drop off my kids at school, or when I go to work?” They answered maybe to all of the above. I hope this Senator notifies the school before attending conferences. If the 33 Senators that voted yes on this bill start carrying a weapon, put the word out, watch out for idiots with weapons. "

Kyle Stoner wrote on March 30, 2006 7:22 pm:
" I can't wait to get shot in traffic! "

Roger wrote on March 30, 2006 8:05 pm:
" Hear the people speak through their representitives and allow the constitution to work the way it was intended to by allowing the people to protect their families, themselves, and their property. Furthemore, never take away the freedom to carry openly. "

Ruth wrote on March 30, 2006 9:32 pm:
" I'm surprised the article in our newspaper didn't list what critera people would have to meet except the amount for the permit and renewal period and background checks. What else do we have to do? It's about time people got back to the basics of our birthright. "

Lauren wrote on March 30, 2006 10:50 pm:
" Does anyone know how to spell "paranoia?" Senator Combs and her NRA sponsors would like to have you believe that all situations real or imagined require a response of violence. Now these are "real Christian values! Are they not?" So much for being followers of the non-violent Jesus! "

Jerome wrote on March 30, 2006 10:52 pm:
" The U.S. constitution allows the keeping and bearing of arms. Concealed is polite, and licensed concealed is nothing to fear. Be afraid of the people carrying concealed who can't get licenses, they are up to no good. In Texas, the first person shot by a person with a licensed concealed weapon needed to be shot, and the grand jury agreed. "

Retired US Army wrote on March 30, 2006 11:00 pm:
" You want to carry a weapon, join up and go to Iraq. They'll even supply the ammo..... "

D wrote on March 30, 2006 11:20 pm:
" I see both positives and negatives of this BUT a LOT more negatives!!! Lincoln could become more dangerous than what it already is!!!! "

Frustrated Citizen wrote on March 31, 2006 12:10 am:
" Wow. We can't have the 'evils' of expanded gambling in this state, but somehow everyone packing heat is ok? Riiiiiiiight. "

BDB wrote on March 31, 2006 1:01 pm:
" Dan: So you are saying that a female who is trying to protect herself from be attacked doesn't deserve to carry a concealed weapon? Not everyone who carries is a criminal. Congrats Senator Combs!! "