Now
Fair
19°
High
47°
Low
29°

Bill aimed at anti-smoking crusader

Text Size: 
Tools Sponsor

By KEVIN O’HANLON / The Associated Press

Friday, Feb 24, 2006 - 11:03:30 am CST

The man who is arguably Nebraska’s most zealous anti-smoking zealot was the target this week of a state senator who wants to make it a crime to file a frivolous complaint against a business for violating the state’s smoking law.

The Judiciary Committee discussed a bill (LB1200) by Sen. Pat Bourne of Omaha aimed at Mark Welsch, president of the Group to Alleviate Smoking Pollution.

Under the measure, filing a frivolous complaint or one that could not be documented against a business for violating the state’s smoking law would be punishable by a $1,000 fine.

Story Photo
Welsch

Related Link(s):

Welsch has filed more than 100 complaints against businesses in the past two years, Bourne said, including at least 19 recently against Grand Island businesses.

Welsch said many of the businesses don’t offer all of their services in smoke-free areas.

The Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act, in effect since 1980, allows businesses to choose whether to allow smoking, ban it, or allow it in designated areas.

“If these businesses, primarily restaurants and bars, were in such violation of the Clean Indoor Air Act so as to endanger the health of the employees and patrons, I find it interesting that no one else filed a complaint,” Bourne said. “To me, these reports of supposed violations seem more like harassment.”

Welsch was in the building and intended to testify at the hearing but missed it because he was conducting other business. But he said afterward it is not faulty reports of violations, but rather the lack of enforcement that constitutes the main problem.

“This is the problem the senators should be concerned about,” he said. “We are afraid that if this bill is passed, other people will be more reluctant to report what they think are violations, because if they are wrong, they could face a stiff fine.”

Under contract with the state in 1999 and 2000, Welsch checked 332 businesses for compliance with the Clean Indoor Air Act.

Welsch found that less than 35 percent of the businesses checked were smoke free. Of the businesses that allowed smoking, 200 out of 217 — or 92 percent, were in violation of the act, Welsch said.

Welsch also expressed concern about how the state would determine an incorrect report was purposely filed.

“Passing a bill such as this into law would only act to further isolate government from those it is to serve,” he said.

Last year, Nebraska lawmakers snuffed out an effort to enact a statewide smoking ban in all restaurants and bars that sell food.

The bill (LB480) by Sen. Nancy Thompson of Papillion — a longtime crusader against tobacco — needed 25 votes to advance to second-round debate. It failed on a vote of 19-to-26.

Bourne failed to amend the bill to preclude cities from enacting smoking bans that are tougher than existing state law.

Bourne said he was concerned that Nebraska could end up with a hodgepodge of local smoking bans. He also said that people who don’t smoke have a choice to not frequent establishments where smoking is allowed.

Lincoln voters approved a smoking ban that went into effect in January 2005 that prohibits smoking in all public buildings — including bars that do not sell food.


$1 Sunday Delivery - Subscribe Today!
Local > Back to Top of Story

All posts to JournalStar.com are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
Frequently asked questions about story commenting.
(optional)
   
George wrote on February 24, 2006 11:57 am:
" It's impossible to assess the need for this law without knowing what complaints have been brought against businesses that have been found to be unjustifiable. Have there been any? "

Former Nebraskan wrote on February 24, 2006 12:02 pm:
" I find it sad that the state of Nebraska has spent so much time and money on worrying about smoking issue because of the few whiners in Lincoln and taken away from the businessperson's right to operate their business in the fashion they think they can make a profit by. Lincoln is becoming Warsaw, too many laws and rules made by the minority. For a state with bigger money woes than surrounding similar states, I can see the money better spent than worrying about if a business wants to have a smoking section, the government treats their citizens like they are idiots, if people want to go to a smoke free restaurant they will, I have seen many across the midwest that have done well without the government's intervention of another law. "

Stan wrote on February 24, 2006 1:18 pm:
" I'm against smoking, but this guy is a total radical. He's probably the sort that goes into any business and always finds something wrong, with his food etc...etc.. The idea to pass a bill that prohibits and fines people from filling frivolous complaints is a good idea. Sometimes people just get mad and put others through hell for no real reason. They cause pain and suffering to individuals....I think people would think twice before they let their irrational emotions get the best of them. I know from person experience people do it to get revenge. I hope it passes.:) "

Jim wrote on February 24, 2006 11:57 pm:
" I always thought this was a free country, but I'm starting to wonder about that more and more every day. The people that are against smoking don't have to go into these establishments, this is still a free country I think. "

Chad wrote on February 25, 2006 5:59 am:
" Sen Bourne has forgotten that his duty is to protet the citizens of Nebrska, not by further enabling nicotine addicts to kill all those around them. These businesses need to comply with the law or pay the penalties. The majority of Nebraskans understand that addicts care about their drug first, followed by everything else in their life. This is common sense, Senator. "

Rick wrote on February 25, 2006 6:44 am:
" I feel any type of smoking ban violates a person freedom of choice. It also violates the business owner rights to run his or hers business the way they feel is fit. every one should have a choice to run a business with or with out smoking ,to work in a place with or with out smoking ,to enter in to a business with or with out smoking. Its a choice people leave it at that cuz the next ban might be againest you think about that. what if they ban your silly cell phone from you its the samething. "

Larry wrote on February 25, 2006 10:10 am:
" This is a free country. I now the freedom to work and eat in a smoke free environment!!!! For those who cigarettes are so damn important...get a life...before you've killed yourself! "

Margaret wrote on February 25, 2006 11:39 am:
" If people choose not to smoke, that is their right. Business owners also have the right to operate their business the way they choose. Non-smokers can stay out of business that allow it. Likewise, employees can choose to work elsewhere if they want to. Banning smokers is taking away their right. Why then is tobacco not illegal? Some people always want to force their beliefs on others. What's next--the food police?? "

John D wrote on February 25, 2006 7:40 pm:
" MARGARET, how many packs a day do you smoke? People who choose not to smoke have made a very healthy choice and it is their right to not be involuntarily exposed to second hand smoke indoors or outdoors and yes the food police have already arrived and they dictate how and under what conditions food must be stored, prepared and served. Also, you are right, tobacco is not illegal and neither is alcoholic beverages but there are restrictions and other conditions that accompany their use. LARRY, you are 100% right, people should not have to be exposed to second hand smoke indoors or outdoors whether working or enjoying leisure time. Come on RICK, get real. Smoking bans don’t violate any ones right to smoke, it just restricts where smoking is permitted. Right on Chad, I bet the Honorable Senator Bourne is a Republican as he has lost the concept of government by the people for the people. Had he expended as much energy to pass LB480 as he as on LB1200, there would be no talk of frivolous complaints. Complaints about smoking would be black and white, no gray areas. Either there was smoke or there was no smoke. Yes JIM this is a free country but we cannot go around willingly inflicting injury on those around us. Hey, if you don’t like my driving stay off the sidewalk, makes as much sense as if you don’t like my smoke stay out of the restaurant or bar. STAN, how can you make such assumptions about a person you have never met. You said “The idea to pass a bill that prohibits and fines people from filling frivolous complaints is a good idea” I think a better idea is the pass a bill that fines senators who try to make frivolous laws such as LB1200. By golly GEORGE if you don’t like the message, shoot the messenger or in this case try to fine him $1000.00 "

Former Lincolnite wrote on February 25, 2006 8:15 pm:
" Whats the fuss about anti-smoking law? It's been a law in NYC as also in NJ. Thank God, no one was asking the right to smoke pot just because its a free country. "